| Literature DB >> 34718808 |
Julien Dubreucq1,2, Franck Gabayet1,2, Ophélia Godin1,3, Myrtille Andre1,4,5, Bruno Aouizerate1,6,7, Delphine Capdevielle1,4,5, Isabelle Chereau1,8, Julie Clauss-Kobayashi1,9, Nathalie Coulon1,2, Thierry D'Amato10,11, Jean-Michel Dorey12,13, Caroline Dubertret1,14,15, Mégane Faraldo1,2, Hakim Laouamri1, Sylvain Leigner1,2, Christophe Lancon1,14,15, Marion Leboyer1,3,16, Pierre-Michel Llorca1,8, Jasmina Mallet1,14,15, David Misdrahi1,17, Christine Passerieux1,18,19, Romain Rey10,11, Baptiste Pignon1,3,16, Benoit Schorr1,9, Mathieu Urbach1,18,19, Franck Schürhoff1,3,16, Andrei Szoke1,3,16, Guillaume Fond1,20, Fabrice Berna1,9.
Abstract
Recovery is a multidimensional construct that can be defined either from a clinical perspective or from a consumer-focused one, as a self-broadening process aimed at living a meaningful life beyond mental illness. We aimed to longitudinally examine the overlap and mutual distinctions between clinical and personal recovery. Of 1239 people with schizophrenia consecutively recruited from the FondaMental Advanced Centers of Expertise for SZ network, the 507 present at one-year did not differ from those lost to follow-up. Clinical recovery was defined as the combination of clinical remission and functional remission. Personal recovery was defined as being in the rebuilding or in the growth stage of the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI). Full recovery was defined as the combination of clinical recovery and personal recovery. First, we examined the factors at baseline associated with each aspect of recovery. Then, we conducted multivariable models on the correlates of stable clinical recovery, stable personal recovery, and stable full recovery after one year. At baseline, clinical recovery and personal recovery were characterized by distinct patterns of outcome (i.e. better objective outcomes but no difference in subjective outcomes for clinical recovery, the opposite pattern for personal recovery, and better overall outcomes for full recovery). We found that clinical recovery and personal recovery predicted each other over time (baseline personal recovery for stable clinical recovery at one year; P = .026, OR = 4.94 [1.30-23.0]; baseline clinical recovery for stable personal recovery at one year; P = .016, OR = 3.64 [1.31-11.2]). In short, given the interaction but also the degree of difference between clinical recovery and personal recovery, psychosocial treatment should target, beyond clinical recovery, subjective aspects such as personal recovery and depression to reach full recovery.Entities:
Keywords: clinical recovery; full recovery; personal recovery; psychosocial treatment; schizophrenia
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34718808 PMCID: PMC8886587 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbab114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schizophr Bull ISSN: 0586-7614 Impact factor: 9.306