Yuanyuan Sheng1,2, Mengmeng Li1, Mingjun Xu1, Yu Zhang1, Jinfeng Xu2, Yuxiang Huang2, Xiaoyi Li1, Guihua Yao1, Wenhai Sui1, Meng Zhang1, Yuan Zhang3,4, Cheng Zhang1,5, Yun Zhang1, Mei Zhang1. 1. The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, The State and Shandong Province Joint Key Laboratory of Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China. 2. The Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), 1017 Dongmen north Road, Shenzhen 518020, China. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 107 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China. 4. Clinical Research Center, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44 Wenhuaxi Road, Jinan 250012, China. 5. Cardiovascular Disease Research Center of Shandong First Medical University, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 105 Jiefang Road, Jinan 250012, China.
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate differences in the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) remodelling in hypertensive patients using various thresholds defined by international guidelines and data from the Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Chinese Adults (EMINCA) study and different indexation methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: LV mass (LVM), relative ventricular wall thickness, and LA volume (LAV) were measured using 2D echocardiography in 612 healthy volunteers selected from the EMINCA study population and 306 adult Chinese patients with hypertension who were age- and gender-matched using propensity score-matched analysis. LVM and LAV values were indexed to body surface area (BSA), height2.7, height1.7, and height2 recommended by guidelines or investigators. Using a previously reported method, LV geometry was divided into normal geometry, concentric remodelling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy. The prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LVH) and LV geometric patterns in hypertensive patients were compared using different thresholds and indexation methods. Echocardiographic thresholds from guidelines and healthy volunteers exhibited notable differences, particularly for LAV indexed to height2 and for LVM indexed to height1.7, which resulted in a significantly lower prevalence of LA dilatation and LVH in healthy volunteers. The total proportion of abnormal LV geometric patterns was significantly lower with thresholds from healthy volunteers than from guidelines when LVM was indexed to BSA, height1.7, and height2,7. CONCLUSION: Using current echocardiographic thresholds and indexing methods recommended by guidelines may lead to significant misdiagnosis of LA dilatation, and abnormal LV geometry in Chinese patients with hypertension, and thresholds based on ethnic-specific normal echocardiographic reference values and an accurate indexing algorithm are warranted. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: To investigate differences in the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) remodelling in hypertensive patients using various thresholds defined by international guidelines and data from the Echocardiographic Measurements in Normal Chinese Adults (EMINCA) study and different indexation methods. METHODS AND RESULTS: LV mass (LVM), relative ventricular wall thickness, and LA volume (LAV) were measured using 2D echocardiography in 612 healthy volunteers selected from the EMINCA study population and 306 adult Chinese patients with hypertension who were age- and gender-matched using propensity score-matched analysis. LVM and LAV values were indexed to body surface area (BSA), height2.7, height1.7, and height2 recommended by guidelines or investigators. Using a previously reported method, LV geometry was divided into normal geometry, concentric remodelling, eccentric hypertrophy, and concentric hypertrophy. The prevalence of LV hypertrophy (LVH) and LV geometric patterns in hypertensive patients were compared using different thresholds and indexation methods. Echocardiographic thresholds from guidelines and healthy volunteers exhibited notable differences, particularly for LAV indexed to height2 and for LVM indexed to height1.7, which resulted in a significantly lower prevalence of LA dilatation and LVH in healthy volunteers. The total proportion of abnormal LV geometric patterns was significantly lower with thresholds from healthy volunteers than from guidelines when LVM was indexed to BSA, height1.7, and height2,7. CONCLUSION: Using current echocardiographic thresholds and indexing methods recommended by guidelines may lead to significant misdiagnosis of LA dilatation, and abnormal LV geometry in Chinese patients with hypertension, and thresholds based on ethnic-specific normal echocardiographic reference values and an accurate indexing algorithm are warranted. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.