Zoe Guan1, Ronglai Shen1, Colin B Begg1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many cancer types show considerable heritability, and extensive research has been done to identify germline susceptibility variants. Linkage studies have discovered many rare high-risk variants, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered many common low-risk variants. However, it is believed that a considerable proportion of the heritability of cancer remains unexplained by known susceptibility variants. The "rare variant hypothesis" proposes that much of the missing heritability lies in rare variants that cannot reliably be detected by linkage analysis or GWAS. Until recently, high sequencing costs have precluded extensive surveys of rare variants, but technological advances have now made it possible to analyze rare variants on a much greater scale. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated associations between rare variants and 14 cancer types. METHODS: We ran association tests using whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and validated the findings using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium (PCAWG). RESULTS: We identified four significant associations in TCGA, only one of which was replicated in PCAWG (BRCA1 and ovarian cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide little evidence in favor of the rare variant hypothesis. Much larger sample sizes may be needed to detect undiscovered rare cancer variants.
BACKGROUND: Many cancer types show considerable heritability, and extensive research has been done to identify germline susceptibility variants. Linkage studies have discovered many rare high-risk variants, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered many common low-risk variants. However, it is believed that a considerable proportion of the heritability of cancer remains unexplained by known susceptibility variants. The "rare variant hypothesis" proposes that much of the missing heritability lies in rare variants that cannot reliably be detected by linkage analysis or GWAS. Until recently, high sequencing costs have precluded extensive surveys of rare variants, but technological advances have now made it possible to analyze rare variants on a much greater scale. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we investigated associations between rare variants and 14 cancer types. METHODS: We ran association tests using whole-exome sequencing data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and validated the findings using data from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium (PCAWG). RESULTS: We identified four significant associations in TCGA, only one of which was replicated in PCAWG (BRCA1 and ovarian cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide little evidence in favor of the rare variant hypothesis. Much larger sample sizes may be needed to detect undiscovered rare cancer variants.
Authors: Or Zuk; Stephen F Schaffner; Kaitlin Samocha; Ron Do; Eliana Hechter; Sekar Kathiresan; Mark J Daly; Benjamin M Neale; Shamil R Sunyaev; Eric S Lander Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wei Dai; Hong Zheng; Arthur Kwok Leung Cheung; Clara Sze-man Tang; Josephine Mun Yee Ko; Bonnie Wing Yan Wong; Merrin Man Long Leong; Pak Chung Sham; Florence Cheung; Dora Lai-Wan Kwong; Roger Kai Cheong Ngan; Wai Tong Ng; Chun Chung Yau; Jianji Pan; Xun Peng; Stewart Tung; Zengfeng Zhang; Mingfang Ji; Alan Kwok-Shing Chiang; Anne Wing-Mui Lee; Victor Ho-Fun Lee; Ka-On Lam; Kwok Hung Au; Hoi Ching Cheng; Harry Ho-Yin Yiu; Maria Li Lung Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lorelei A Mucci; Jacob B Hjelmborg; Jennifer R Harris; Kamila Czene; David J Havelick; Thomas Scheike; Rebecca E Graff; Klaus Holst; Sören Möller; Robert H Unger; Christina McIntosh; Elizabeth Nuttall; Ingunn Brandt; Kathryn L Penney; Mikael Hartman; Peter Kraft; Giovanni Parmigiani; Kaare Christensen; Markku Koskenvuo; Niels V Holm; Kauko Heikkilä; Eero Pukkala; Axel Skytthe; Hans-Olov Adami; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kevin Litchfield; Max Levy; Darshna Dudakia; Paula Proszek; Claire Shipley; Sander Basten; Elizabeth Rapley; D Timothy Bishop; Alison Reid; Robert Huddart; Peter Broderick; David Gonzalez de Castro; Simon O'Connor; Rachel H Giles; Richard S Houlston; Clare Turnbull Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: William McLaren; Laurent Gil; Sarah E Hunt; Harpreet Singh Riat; Graham R S Ritchie; Anja Thormann; Paul Flicek; Fiona Cunningham Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Ninad Oak; Andrew D Cherniack; R Jay Mashl; Fred R Hirsch; Li Ding; Rameen Beroukhim; Zeynep H Gümüş; Sharon E Plon; Kuan-Lin Huang Journal: Genome Med Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 15.266