Literature DB >> 34718190

Distribution of erm genes among MRSA isolates with resistance to clindamycin in a Chinese teaching hospital.

Haiping Wang1, Hemu Zhuang1, Shujuan Ji1, Lu Sun1, Feng Zhao2, Dandan Wu3, Ping Shen4, Yan Jiang1, Yunsong Yu5, Yan Chen6.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze erythromycin and clindamycin resistance patterns among different MRSA lineages in China. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, resistance determinant screening, plasmid electroporation and sequence comparisons were performed. High rates of clindamycin (92.5%, 270/292) and erythromycin (92.8%, 271/292) resistance were observed. Additionally, 88.2% (60/68) of the ST59 MRSA isolates and 78.9% (15/19) of the ST239 MRSA isolates had constitutive resistance to clindamycin, while 82.0% (123/150) of the ST5 MRSA isolates showed inducible clindamycin resistance. The ermB gene was identified in 80.9% (55/68) of the ST59 isolates but was not detected in ST5 and ST239 MRSA isolates. Detection rates of ermA were high in the ST5 (99.3%, 149/150) and ST239 (89.5%, 17/19) MRSA isolates, but no ermA-positive ST59 MRSA isolates were identified. The ermC gene, observed to be harbored on similar, transmissible plasmids ranging in size from 2402 to 2473 bp, were found in different MRSA lineages. Summarily, high erythromycin and clindamycin resistance rates were observed in MRSA isolates. ST59 and ST239 MRSA isolates primarily exhibited constitutive resistance, while ST5 MRSA isolates showed inducible resistance phenotypes. ermA and ermB genes were frequently carried by specific MRSA clones, while ermC gene was present within small transmissible plasmids in all lineages. Erythromycin and clindamycin resistance genes transfer between MRSA isolates in healthcare settings remains a problem, and infection control procedures should be applied.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clindamycin resistance; Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Plasmid; erm gene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34718190     DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Genet Evol        ISSN: 1567-1348            Impact factor:   3.342


  1 in total

Review 1.  Inducible Clindamycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Africa: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Muluneh Assefa
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.