| Literature DB >> 34717102 |
Lin Yuan1, Dongyan Liu2, Bo Tian3, Xiao Yuan4, Shunqi Bo4, Qiang Ma5, Wei Wu5, Zhiyuan Zhao3, Liquan Zhang3, John K Keesing6.
Abstract
Loss of coastal wetland habitats has been directly linked to a decline in waterbird populations including migratory species, leading to calls to reverse this trend in part by restoring these habitats. However, distinct "sediment scarcity" has hindered coastal habitat restoration. Here, taking the Yangtze River Delta, China as an example, we put forward a feasible solution to solve the sediment shortage in habitat restoration so necessary to restore migratory waterbird numbers. Four biological indices including total wetland area, wetland vegetation area and waterbird species richness and abundance, were used to compare and assess the restorative efforts. Three solutions were adopted for the rehabilitation sites, including promoting sediment deposition and settlement through engineering intervention in Chongming Dongtan (CD) and Eastern Nanhui (EN), and using dredged sediments to nourish and create new habitats in Hengsha Eastern Shoal (HES). The mean wetland area increased 19.66 km2/yr in EN, 8.78 km2/yr in HES and 3.83 km2/yr in CD after rehabilitation. Along with the increase of wetlands and habitats, the abundance of waterbirds increased 1.3 times, 121 times and 1.5 times in EN, HES and CD, respectively. In contrast, in the site of Fengxian and Jinshan (FJ) where no any rehabilitation measure was taken after reclamation, the habitats were lost almost completely and the waterbird abundance dropped drastically. The comparison and assessment results demonstrate that proper coastal silting structures and ecological utilization of nearby dredged sediments are the feasible and effective solutions to retain sediments, restore coastal habitats and increase waterbird diversity and abundance.Entities:
Keywords: Coastal engineering; Coastal wetlands; Habitat restoration; Sediment; Waterbird; Wetland vegetation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34717102 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Manage ISSN: 0301-4797 Impact factor: 6.789