Literature DB >> 34717062

Effects of Acute Pump Speed Changes on Cerebral Hemodynamics in Patients With an Implantable Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

M Konarik1, M Sramko, Z Dorazilova, M Blaha, I Netuka, P Ivak, J Maly, O Szarszoi.   

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an established therapeutic option for advanced heart failure. Most of the currently used LVADs generate a continuous stream of blood that decreases arterial pulse pressure. This study investigated whether a change of the pulse pressure during different pump speed settings would affect cerebral autoregulation and thereby affect cerebral blood flow (CBF). The study included 21 haemodynamically stable outpatients with a continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate II, Abbott, USA) implanted a median of 6 months before the study (interquartile range 3 to 14 months). Arterial blood pressure (measured by finger plethysmography) was recorded simultaneously with CBF (measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound) during baseline pump speed (8900 rpm [IQR 8800; 9200]) and during minimum and maximum tolerated pump speeds (8000 rpm [IQR 8000; 8200] and 9800 rpm [IQR 9800; 10 000]). An increase in LVAD pump speed by 800 rpm [IQR 800; 1000] from the baseline lead to a significant decrease in arterial pulse pressure and cerebral blood flow pulsatility (relative change ?24% and ?32%, both p < 0.01), but it did not affect mean arterial pressure and mean CBF velocity (relative change 1% and ?1.7%, p = 0.1 and 0.7). In stable patients with a continuous-flow LVAD, changes of pump speed settings within a clinically used range did not impair static cerebral autoregulation and cerebral blood flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34717062      PMCID: PMC8815470          DOI: 10.33549/physiolres.934738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Res        ISSN: 0862-8408            Impact factor:   1.881


  13 in total

1.  Are changes in cerebrovascular autoregulation following cardiac arrest associated with neurological outcome? Results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Paul Pham; Jessica Bindra; Alwin Chuan; Matthias Jaeger; Anders Aneman
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 2.  Utility of transcranial Doppler ultrasound for the integrative assessment of cerebrovascular function.

Authors:  C K Willie; F L Colino; D M Bailey; Y C Tzeng; G Binsted; L W Jones; M J Haykowsky; J Bellapart; S Ogoh; K J Smith; J D Smirl; T A Day; S J Lucas; L K Eller; P N Ainslie
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  CrossTalk opposing view: Blood flow pulsatility in left ventricular assist device patients is not essential to maintain normal brain physiology.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Justin Lawley; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Restoration of Pulsatile Flow Reduces Sympathetic Nerve Activity Among Individuals With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Abigail Stickford; Justin Lawley; Monique Roberts; Rosemary Parker; Catherine Fitzsimmons; Julius Kibe; Colby Ayers; David Markham; Mark H Drazner; Qi Fu; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Eighth annual INTERMACS report: Special focus on framing the impact of adverse events.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; Francis D Pagani; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Elizabeth D Blume; Susan L Myers; Marissa A Miller; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young; David C Naftel
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Cerebral autoregulation in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juliana R Caldas; Victoria J Haunton; Ronney B Panerai; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Thompson G Robinson
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-01

7.  Cerebral blood flow autoregulation is preserved after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Masahiro Ono; Brijen Joshi; Kenneth Brady; R Blaine Easley; Kathy Kibler; John Conte; Ashish Shah; Stuart D Russell; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Effect of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow on cerebral perfusion in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Vincent L Aengevaeren; Colby Ayers; Punag Divanji; Qi Fu; Dean Palmer; Mark H Drazner; Dan M Meyer; Brian T Bethea; Jeffrey L Hastings; Naoki Fujimoto; Shigeki Shibata; Rong Zhang; David W Markham; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  The effect of Ventricular Assist Devices on cerebral autoregulation: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Judith Bellapart; Gregory S Chan; Yu-Chieh Tzeng; Philip Ainslie; Adrian G Barnett; Kimble R Dunster; Rob Boots; John F Fraser
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  The role of cerebral hyperperfusion in postoperative neurologic dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation for end-stage heart failure.

Authors:  Katherine Lietz; Kevin Brown; Syed S Ali; Monica Colvin-Adams; Andrew J Boyle; David Anderson; Alan D Weinberg; Leslie W Miller; Soon Park; Ranjit John; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.