Literature DB >> 34716917

The Impact of the CYP2D6 "Enhancer" Single Nucleotide Polymorphism on CYP2D6 Activity.

Jean C Dinh1, Erin C Boone1, Vincent S Staggs2,3, Robin E Pearce1, Wendy Y Wang1, Roger Gaedigk1, James Steven Leeder1,3, Andrea Gaedigk1,3.   

Abstract

rs5758550 has been associated with enhanced transcription and suggested to be a useful marker of CYP2D6 activity. As there are limited and inconsistent data regarding the utility of this distant "enhancer" single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), our goal was to further assess the impact of rs5758550 on CYP2D6 activity toward two probe substrates, atomoxetine (ATX) and dextromethorphan (DM), using in vivo urinary metabolite (DM; n = 188) and pharmacokinetic (ATX; n = 70) and in vitro metabolite formation (ATX and DM; n = 166) data. All subjects and tissues were extensively genotyped, the "enhancer" SNP phased with established CYP2D6 haplotypes either computationally or experimentally, and the impact on CYP2D6 activity investigated using several linear models of varying complexity to determine the proportion of variability in CYP2D6 activity captured by each model. For all datasets and models, the "enhancer" SNP had no or only a modest impact on CYP2D6 activity prediction. An increased effect, when present, was more pronounced for ATX than DM suggesting potential substate-dependency. In addition, CYP2D6*2 alleles with the "enhancer" SNP were associated with modestly higher metabolite formation rates in vitro, but not in vivo; no effect was detected for CYP2D6*1 alleles with "enhancer" SNP. In summary, it remains inconclusive whether the small effects detected in this investigation are indeed caused by the "enhancer" SNP or are rather due to its incomplete linkage with other variants within the gene. Taken together, there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to warrant the "enhancer" SNP be included in clinical CYP2D6 pharmacogenetic testing.
© 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2021 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34716917      PMCID: PMC8825689          DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  34 in total

1.  Intra-individual variability and influence of urine collection period on dextromethorphan metabolic ratios in healthy subjects.

Authors:  J Chládek; G Zimová; J Martínková; I Tůma
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.748

Review 2.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.

Authors:  J K Hicks; J R Bishop; K Sangkuhl; D J Müller; Y Ji; S G Leckband; J S Leeder; R L Graham; D L Chiulli; A LLerena; T C Skaar; S A Scott; J C Stingl; T E Klein; K E Caudle; A Gaedigk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Physicochemical Properties, Biotransformation, and Transport Pathways of Established and Newly Approved Medications: A Systematic Review of the Top 200 Most Prescribed Drugs vs. the FDA-Approved Drugs Between 2005 and 2016.

Authors:  Anitha Saravanakumar; Armin Sadighi; Rachel Ryu; Fatemeh Akhlaghi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  CYP2D6 haplotypes with enhancer single-nucleotide polymorphism rs5758550 and rs16947 (*2 allele): implications for CYP2D6 genotyping panels.

Authors:  Balmiki Ray; Eren Ozcagli; Wolfgang Sadee; Danxin Wang
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline (CPIC) for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants: 2016 update.

Authors:  J K Hicks; K Sangkuhl; J J Swen; V L Ellingrod; D J Müller; K Shimoda; J R Bishop; E D Kharasch; T C Skaar; A Gaedigk; H M Dunnenberger; T E Klein; K E Caudle; J C Stingl
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  CYP2D6 Haplotype Determination Using Long Range Allele-Specific Amplification: Resolution of a Complex Genotype and a Discordant Genotype Involving the CYP2D6*59 Allele.

Authors:  Andrea Gaedigk; Amanda K Riffel; J Steven Leeder
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  Common CYP2D6 polymorphisms affecting alternative splicing and transcription: long-range haplotypes with two regulatory variants modulate CYP2D6 activity.

Authors:  Danxin Wang; Ming J Poi; Xiaochun Sun; Andrea Gaedigk; J Steven Leeder; Wolfgang Sadee
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and Tamoxifen Therapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Goetz; Katrin Sangkuhl; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Matthias Schwab; Michael Province; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; W Fraser Symmans; Howard L McLeod; Mark J Ratain; Hitoshi Zembutsu; Andrea Gaedigk; Ron H van Schaik; James N Ingle; Kelly E Caudle; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Intraindividual Variation and Correlation of Cytochrome P450 Activities in Human Liver Microsomes.

Authors:  Yan Fang; Jie Gao; Tong Wang; Xin Tian; Na Gao; Jun Zhou; Hai-Feng Zhang; Qiang Wen; Han Jin; Yu-Rong Xing; Hai-Ling Qiao
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Evaluation of the CYP2D6 Haplotype Activity Scores Based on Metabolic Ratios of 4,700 Patients Treated With Three Different CYP2D6 Substrates.

Authors:  Marin M Jukić; Robert L Smith; Espen Molden; Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.