| Literature DB >> 34716721 |
Albert Z Lim1,2, Yi Shiau Ng1,2, Alasdair Blain1, Cecilia Jiminez-Moreno1, Charlotte L Alston1,2, Victoria Nesbitt3, Louise Simmons4, Saikat Santra4, Evangeline Wassmer4, Emma L Blakely1,2, Doug M Turnbull1,2, Robert W Taylor1,2, Gráinne S Gorman1,2, Robert McFarland1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This observational cohort study aims to quantify disease burden over time, establish disease progression rates, and identify factors that may determine the disease course of Leigh syndrome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34716721 PMCID: PMC9534328 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Neurol ISSN: 0364-5134 Impact factor: 11.274
Genotypic Spectrum of the 72 Children with Leigh Syndrome from 68 Pedigrees in This Study
| Inheritance | Mitochondrial Function | Gene | cDNA Change | Corresponding Protein Change | Children, n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitochondrial genome | Complex I subunits |
| m.3688G > A | p.Ala128Thr | 1 |
|
| m.11778A > G | p.Arg340His | 3 | ||
|
| m.12706 T > C, m.13513G > A | p.Phe124Leu, p.Asp393Asn | 2 | ||
|
| m.14459G > A | p.Ala72Val | 1 | ||
| Complex V subunits |
| m.8993 T > C, m.8993 T > G, m.9035 T > C, m.9176 T > C | p.Leu156Arg, p.Leu156Pro, p.Leu170Pro, p.Leu217Pro | 9 | |
| Nuclear genome | Complex I subunits |
| c.1156C > T, c.1268C > T | p.Arg386Cys, p.Thr423Met | 5 |
|
| c.2102G > A, c.338 + 3A > G | p.Ser701Asn, p.Val88Glyfs*19 | 2 | ||
|
| c.394C > T, c.1079G > A | p.Arg132*, p.Arg360His | 1 | ||
| Complex I assembly factors |
| c.226 T > C | p.Ser76Pro | 2 | |
|
| c.45_52dup, c.195 + 271C > T | p.Phe18Serfs*32, splicing | 1 | ||
| Complex IV assembly factors |
|
c.312‐321delinsAT, c.515 + 5G > C, c.792_793delAG, c.574_575insCTGC, c.752‐2A > G, c.488 T > G |
p.Leu105*, splicing, p.Arg264Serfs*27, p.Arg192Profs*8, splicing, p.Val163Gly | 7 | |
| mtDNA maintenance and replication |
| c.434C > A, c.272‐2A > C, c.1271del, c.1219C > T, c.851G > A | p.Thr145Lys, splicing, p.Gly424Aspfs*18, p.Arg407Trp, p.Arg284His | 4 | |
|
| c.121C > T | p.Ser25Profs*49 | 1 | ||
| Mitochondrial translation factors |
| c.626C > T | p.Arg181Serfs*5 | 2 | |
|
| c.96_99dup | p.Pro34Ilefs*25 | 1 | ||
|
| c.460 T > C | p.Ser154Pro | 2 | ||
| Mitochondrial fatty acid beta oxidation |
| c.251C > G, c.1A > T, c.518C > T, c.476A > G | p.Ala84Gly, start loss, p.Ala173Val, p.Gln159Arg | 5 | |
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency |
| c.759 + 26G > A, c.506C > T | p.Asp255Argfs*22, p.Ala169Val | 2 | |
|
| c.1231C > T, c.1159C > T | p.Gln411*, p.Gln387* | 3 | ||
| Aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases |
| c.670C > T, c.1142A > G | p.His224Tyr, p.Asn381Ser | 2 | |
|
| c.228‐15C > A, c.492 + 2 T > C | p.Arg76Serfs*6, p.Met134_Lys165del | 1 | ||
| Others |
| c.1241_1252del, c.1612C > T | p.Tyr414_Val417del, p.Arg538Cys | 1 | |
|
| c.1324_1327delinsAT | p.Tyr442Metfs*35 | 1 | ||
| Others (presumed nuclear) | Isolated complex I deficiency | 6 | |||
| Complex II + III deficiency | 1 | ||||
| Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency | 1 | ||||
| Persistently elevated lactate | 5 | ||||
FIGURE 1The Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) ratings for each item in this cohort of children with Leigh syndrome. The percentages of children with Leigh syndrome were rated as normal (green), mild (yellow), moderate (amber), and severe (red) in selected items of the NPMDS. Baseline and follow‐up NPMDS scores were arranged alongside each other for comparisons in respective items: (A) current function, (B) system‐specific involvement, and (C) clinical assessment. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
FIGURE 2The interitem relationships of the Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) items in this cohort of children with Leigh syndrome. Any positive Kendall tau‐b (τ b) correlation coefficients are shown in darker shades. The correlation matrix at baseline (left) and at follow‐up assessments (right) were similar. CPEO = chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
FIGURE 3The change of total Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) scores for all participants. (A) A bee swarm plot of the total NPMDS scores for each individual patient in this study at baseline (left swarm) and at follow‐up (right swarm). Horizontal bars indicate the median scores. The median score rose from 18 at baseline to 24 at follow‐up NPMDS assessments. The difference between these two assessments was significant at p < 0.001. (B) A vector graph showing these changes according to their ages. Each individual line shows the change in NPMDS scores from baseline to follow‐up assessments for every patient in this study. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
FIGURE 4The vector plots for Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) scores at baseline and at follow‐up in this study based on their genotypes. The grey vector lines indicate patients who had died since the end of study. aδ represents the change of NPMDS scores per annum. Vector plots are categorized into several groups according to genotypes: (A) complex I assembly factor and structural protein variants (NDUFV1, NDUFS1, NDUFA9, NDUFA13, NDUFAF6, NDUFAF8), (B) mtDNA‐encoded complex I subunits variants (MT‐ND1, MT‐ND4, MT‐ND5, MT‐ND6), (C) pathogenic SURF1 gene variants affecting complex IV assembly, (D) MT‐ATP6 gene variants, (E) pathogenic variants affecting pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHA1, PDHX), and (F) other pathogenic nuclear gene variants. Children without a known genetic diagnosis are not shown here. **p < 0.01. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
FIGURE 5The Kaplan–Meier curves for survival probability from mortality and from severe disease burden (Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale [NPMDS] score > 25). (A) Survival probability for those children with disease onset at 6 months and younger. (B) Probability of NPMDS > 25 for disease onset at 6 months and younger. (C, D) Probability of SURF1 cases compared to other nuclear and mitochondrial pathogenic variants from mortality (C) and severe disease burden (NPMDS > 25; D). There were significant differences between the SURF1 cases and the other two genotypes. (E) The survival probability of different disease burden based on NPMDS scores (mild, 0–14; moderate, 15–25; severe, >25). Those children with severe disease burden (NPMDS > 25) had significantly worse survival than those who had mild or moderate disease burden. (F) The survival probability of disease progression shows that those who had a change of >3 points on the NPMDS scores per annum also had significantly poorer survival outcomes. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
FIGURE 6Neuroimaging of this cohort of children with Leigh syndrome. (A) A representative neuroimaging changes in these children with Leigh syndrome: (i) medulla, (ii) cerebellar nuclei, (iii) pons, (iv) midbrain, (v) thalami, (vi) globus pallidus, (vii) putamen, (viii) caudate, (ix) white matter involvement, (x) thin corpus callosum, (xi) generalized atrophy. (B) The correlation matrix of Φ values of positive findings for each region of the brain based on the neuroimaging images of 63 patients. Green represents positive nominal‐by‐nominal association. (C) The point biserial Pearson correlation factor for each abnormal neuroimaging change against the disease burden (follow‐up Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale [NPMDS] scores), disease progression (NPMDS score change per annum), and death. Blue indicates positive correlation. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]