| Literature DB >> 34716641 |
Jiaxin Yin1, Min Yao2, Hongdi Lu3, Xiaofeng Cong1, Pengfei Cui1, Ziling Liu1.
Abstract
Ependymomas arise from ependymal cells lining the ventricles and central canal of the spinal cord and can occur throughout the whole neuraxis. The lesion rarely occurs in extracranial or extraspinal regions, particularly in the uterine broad ligament. Thus, for the pathogenesis of nonsacral extra-central nervous system (CNS) ependymomas remains elusive. Here, we describe a rare case of primary uterine broad ligament. ependymoma with cell-cycle-checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) p.H371Y germline mutation. A 45-year-old woman presented with a uterine mass. The transvaginal sonographic examination confirmed a 4.4 cm × 3.7 cm, cystic and solid, mass located on the right side uterine wall near isthmus. First, laparoscopy with the neoplasm resection was carried out. Based on morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of tumor cells that expressed glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S-100, and vimentin, the tumor was diagnosed as an ependymoma. After that, she underwent a laparotomic total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, we performed next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the patient's resected tumor tissue and peripheral blood and identified a novel CHEK2 p.H371Y germline mutation. Following surgery, the patient received oral tamoxifen (10 mg 2/day) and followed by letrozole (2.5 mg/day) for 6 months. The patient remained disease-free after 4 years of follow-up. Conceivably, CHEK2 p.H371Y is a driving gene for the development of extra-CNS ependymoma.Entities:
Keywords: CHEK2 p.H371Y; ependymoma; next-generation sequencing; uterine broad ligament
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34716641 PMCID: PMC9298396 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Res ISSN: 1341-8076 Impact factor: 1.697
FIGURE 1Histopathological examination revealed perivascular pseudorosettes and ependymal rosettes, with a central lumen radially surrounded by tumor cells (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain, ×100 magnification)
FIGURE 2(a) Histopathological examination revealed perivascular pseudorosettes and ependymal rosettes, with a central lumen radially surrounded by tumor cells (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain, ×200 magnification). (b) Tumor cells showing diffuse cytoplasmic positivity with glial fibrillary acidic protein (immunohistochemistry; glial fibrillary astrocytic protein ×100). (c) Tumor cells showing cytoplasmic positivity with vimentin (immunohistochemistry; vimentin ×100). (d) Tumor cells showing nuclear positivity with paired box 8 (immunohistochemistry; paired box 8 × 100, by EnVision)
Clinicopathological characteristics of reported ependymomas of the uterus or uterine ligaments
| References | Age | Location | Symptom | Size (cm) | Gross appearance | Histological type | Metastasis | Therapy | Recurrence | Follow up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 27 | Right broad ligament | Lower abdominal pain | 14 | Cystic and solid | Classical | Omentum | Surgery + chemoradiotherapy | 5 months | |
|
| 22 | Left broad ligament | Left adnexa mass | 7 | Cystic | Myxopapillary | None | Surgery + chemotherapy | 18 months | |
|
| 13 | Right broad ligament | Pelvic mass | 12 | Cystic | Classical | None | Surgery | Retroperitoneum (11 years 24 years), surgery | 26 years |
|
| 45 | Right broad ligament | Lower abdominal pain | 13 | Hemorrhagic necrotic | Classical | Bladder | Surgery + radiotherapy | 21 months | |
|
| 48 | Right uterosacral ligament | Suprapubic discomfort | 11 | Cystic and solid | Classical | Peritoneal | Surgery + radiotherapy | 18 months | |
|
| 47 | Mesovarium right ovary | Suprapubic discomfort | 1 | Solid | Classical | Surgery | 2 years | ||
|
| 61 | Endometrium | Solid | Papillary | Abdomen | Surgery | ||||
| Current case | 45 | Right broad ligament | Uterine mass | 4 | Cystic and solid | Classical | Obturator lymph node | Surgery + endocrimotherapy | 4 years |