Laura Keaver1,2, Christine Houlihan3, Niamh O'Callaghan3, Amy E LaVertu4, Xinge Ding5, Fang Fang Zhang5. 1. Department of Health and Nutritional Science, Institute of Technology Sligo, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. keaver.laura@itsligo.ie. 2. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. keaver.laura@itsligo.ie. 3. Department of Health and Nutritional Science, Institute of Technology Sligo, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland. 4. Hirsh Health Sciences Library, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. 5. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) document currently available guidelines aimed at healthcare professionals and including some information on the nutritional management of cancer survivors in Europe; (2) assess the quality of these guidelines and (3) document the nutrition recommendations promoted. METHODS: Four search strategies were implemented in 2018 and updated in 2021 to locate guidelines. Papers were included if they described a European guideline or recommendation for cancer survivors that contained nutrition guidance and there were no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument and nutrition content was extracted and summarised. RESULTS: Five guidelines (of 593 documents located through the searches) met the inclusion criteria. The ESPEN guidelines were deemed to have the highest methodological quality. Limited information on nutrition was available in these guidelines with the majority of focus being on the promotion of fruit, vegetables and wholegrains and reducing fat, red meat and alcohol. Weight management was mentioned by all five guidelines. There was no detailed information available for cancer survivors or their healthcare team and no practical strategies for the implementation of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for nutrition guidelines specific for cancer survivors in a European setting. Current guidelines are limited and focus on broad recommendations, while lacking in practical strategies for implementation. There is also a tendency to recommend cancer prevention guidelines be used for cancer survivors rather than developing specific guidance for this group.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to (1) document currently available guidelines aimed at healthcare professionals and including some information on the nutritional management of cancer survivors in Europe; (2) assess the quality of these guidelines and (3) document the nutrition recommendations promoted. METHODS: Four search strategies were implemented in 2018 and updated in 2021 to locate guidelines. Papers were included if they described a European guideline or recommendation for cancer survivors that contained nutrition guidance and there were no language restrictions. Two reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument and nutrition content was extracted and summarised. RESULTS: Five guidelines (of 593 documents located through the searches) met the inclusion criteria. The ESPEN guidelines were deemed to have the highest methodological quality. Limited information on nutrition was available in these guidelines with the majority of focus being on the promotion of fruit, vegetables and wholegrains and reducing fat, red meat and alcohol. Weight management was mentioned by all five guidelines. There was no detailed information available for cancer survivors or their healthcare team and no practical strategies for the implementation of recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for nutrition guidelines specific for cancer survivors in a European setting. Current guidelines are limited and focus on broad recommendations, while lacking in practical strategies for implementation. There is also a tendency to recommend cancer prevention guidelines be used for cancer survivors rather than developing specific guidance for this group.
Authors: Cheryl L Rock; Colleen Doyle; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Kerry S Courneya; Anna L Schwartz; Elisa V Bandera; Kathryn K Hamilton; Barbara Grant; Marji McCullough; Tim Byers; Ted Gansler Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Jann Arends; Patrick Bachmann; Vickie Baracos; Nicole Barthelemy; Hartmut Bertz; Federico Bozzetti; Ken Fearon; Elisabeth Hütterer; Elizabeth Isenring; Stein Kaasa; Zeljko Krznaric; Barry Laird; Maria Larsson; Alessandro Laviano; Stefan Mühlebach; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Line Oldervoll; Paula Ravasco; Tora Solheim; Florian Strasser; Marian de van der Schueren; Jean-Charles Preiser Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2016-08-06 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Sarah J Nechuta; Bette J Caan; Wendy Y Chen; Shirley W Flatt; Wei Lu; Ruth E Patterson; Elizabeth M Poole; Marilyn L Kwan; Zhi Chen; Erin Weltzien; John P Pierce; Xiao Ou Shu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2011-06-28 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Roberta De Angelis; Milena Sant; Michel P Coleman; Silvia Francisci; Paolo Baili; Daniela Pierannunzio; Annalisa Trama; Otto Visser; Hermann Brenner; Eva Ardanaz; Magdalena Bielska-Lasota; Gerda Engholm; Alice Nennecke; Sabine Siesling; Franco Berrino; Riccardo Capocaccia Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Carol E DeSantis; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Rebecca L Siegel; Kevin D Stein; Joan L Kramer; Rick Alteri; Anthony S Robbins; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 508.702