Literature DB >> 34716283

Effects of IQOS health warnings and modified risk claims among young adult cigarette smokers and non-smokers.

Darren Mays1, Andrea C Johnson2, Allison Glasser3, Melissa Mercincavage2, Andrew A Strasser2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Heated tobacco products, including Marlboro IQOS, are available globally. In the USA, IQOS was authorised to be advertised with claims about reduced toxicant exposure relative to cigarettes. The effects of such modified risk claims and health warnings have not been studied among young adult cigarette smokers and non-smokers.
METHODS: In 2020, US young adult (18-30 years, n=1328) cigarette smokers and non-smokers viewed an IQOS ad in a 4 (modified risk claim variations or none) by 3 (warning variations or none) between-subjects experiment. Outcome measures assessed perceived credibility and effectiveness of the health or risk message for discouraging IQOS use, perceived harms, efficacy beliefs, and IQOS use intentions.
RESULTS: Smokers reported significantly higher (p<0.05) perceived credibility, lower perceived effectiveness, higher efficacy beliefs about switching to IQOS and higher intentions to use IQOS than non-smokers. Among smokers, health warnings increased perceived credibility (p<0.001) and effectiveness (p<0.05), but claims did not affect outcomes examined. Among non-smokers, warnings and claims increased perceived credibility, and warnings increased perceived effectiveness (p<0.003). The reduced exposure claim increased non-smokers' intentions to use IQOS (b=0.40, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: Among young adult smokers, health warnings increased perceived effectiveness at discouraging IQOS use and perceived credibility. Among non-smokers, warnings and claims increased perceived credibility and warnings increased perceived effectiveness, but the Food and Drug Administration-authorised reduced exposure claim increased intentions to use IQOS. Research is warranted to understand how the content of modified risk claims and health warnings for IQOS affects IQOS use in this population. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  non-cigarette tobacco products; packaging and labelling; prevention

Year:  2021        PMID: 34716283      PMCID: PMC9050959          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   6.953


  31 in total

1.  Adult interest in using a hypothetical modified risk tobacco product: findings from wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-14).

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda L Johnson; Sarah E Johnson; Cassandra A Stanton; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Allison M Glasser; Baoguang Wang; David B Abrams; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Do Young Adults Attend to Health Warnings in the First IQOS Advertisement in the U.S.? An Eye-Tracking Approach.

Authors:  Jiaying Liu; Joe Phua; Dean Krugman; Linjia Xu; Glen Nowak; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Beliefs about E-cigarettes: A Focus Group Study with College Students.

Authors:  Sherri Jean Katz; Meghan Erkinnen; Bruce Lindgren; Dorothy Hatsukami
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2019-01-01

4.  Young Adult Correlates of IQOS Curiosity, Interest, and Likelihood of Use.

Authors:  Lilianna Phan; Andrew A Strasser; Andrea C Johnson; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond Niaura; Kathryn Rehberg; Darren Mays
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2020-03

5.  Early adoption of heated tobacco products resembles that of e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Shu-Hong Zhu; Julian Ong; Shiushing Wong; Adam Cole; Yue-Lin Zhuang; Yuyan Shi
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.953

6.  Comparing Twitter and Online Panels for Survey Recruitment of E-Cigarette Users and Smokers.

Authors:  Jamie Guillory; Annice Kim; Joe Murphy; Brian Bradfield; James Nonnemaker; Yuli Hsieh
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Impact of modified risk tobacco product claims on beliefs of US adults and adolescents.

Authors:  Sherine El-Toukhy; Sabeeh A Baig; Michelle Jeong; M Justin Byron; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Heat-not-burn tobacco products: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Erikas Simonavicius; Ann McNeill; Lion Shahab; Leonie S Brose
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Smokers' and Young Adult Non-Smokers' Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Mariam Rashid; Kathryn L Greene; M Jane Lewis; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.