Literature DB >> 34716229

Cortical Control of Virtual Self-Motion Using Task-Specific Subspaces.

Karen E Schroeder1,2, Sean M Perkins2,3, Qi Wang3, Mark M Churchland4,2,5,6.   

Abstract

Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) for reaching have enjoyed continued performance improvements, yet there remains significant need for BMIs that control other movement classes. Recent scientific findings suggest that the intrinsic covariance structure of neural activity depends strongly on movement class, potentially necessitating different decode algorithms across classes. To address this possibility, we developed a self-motion BMI based on cortical activity as monkeys cycled a hand-held pedal to progress along a virtual track. Unlike during reaching, we found no high-variance dimensions that directly correlated with to-be-decoded variables. This was due to no neurons having consistent correlations between their responses and kinematic variables. Yet we could decode a single variable-self-motion-by nonlinearly leveraging structure that spanned multiple high-variance neural dimensions. Resulting online BMI-control success rates approached those during manual control. These findings make two broad points regarding how to build decode algorithms that harmonize with the empirical structure of neural activity in motor cortex. First, even when decoding from the same cortical region (e.g., arm-related motor cortex), different movement classes may need to employ very different strategies. Although correlations between neural activity and hand velocity are prominent during reaching tasks, they are not a fundamental property of motor cortex and cannot be counted on to be present in general. Second, although one generally desires a low-dimensional readout, it can be beneficial to leverage a multidimensional high-variance subspace. Fully embracing this approach requires highly nonlinear approaches tailored to the task at hand, but can produce near-native levels of performance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Many brain-machine interface decoders have been constructed for controlling movements normally performed with the arm. Yet it is unclear how these will function beyond the reach-like scenarios where they were developed. Existing decoders implicitly assume that neural covariance structure, and correlations with to-be-decoded kinematic variables, will be largely preserved across tasks. We find that the correlation between neural activity and hand kinematics, a feature typically exploited when decoding reach-like movements, is essentially absent during another task performed with the arm: cycling through a virtual environment. Nevertheless, the use of a different strategy, one focused on leveraging the highest-variance neural signals, supported high performance real-time brain-machine interface control.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; motor cortex; prosthetics; subspaces

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34716229      PMCID: PMC8802935          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2687-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  64 in total

1.  Detecting neural-state transitions using hidden Markov models for motor cortical prostheses.

Authors:  Caleb Kemere; Gopal Santhanam; Byron M Yu; Afsheen Afshar; Stephen I Ryu; Teresa H Meng; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Robust tactile sensory responses in finger area of primate motor cortex relevant to prosthetic control.

Authors:  Karen E Schroeder; Zachary T Irwin; Autumn J Bullard; David E Thompson; J Nicole Bentley; William C Stacey; Parag G Patil; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Neural Manifolds for the Control of Movement.

Authors:  Juan A Gallego; Matthew G Perich; Lee E Miller; Sara A Solla
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Dynamics of motor cortical activity during naturalistic feeding behavior.

Authors:  Shizhao Liu; Jose Iriate-Diaz; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Callum F Ross; Kazutaka Takahashi; Zhe Chen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting.

Authors:  Francis R Willett; Donald T Avansino; Leigh R Hochberg; Jaimie M Henderson; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Neural population dynamics during reaching.

Authors:  Mark M Churchland; John P Cunningham; Matthew T Kaufman; Justin D Foster; Paul Nuyujukian; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning.

Authors:  Jonathan A Michaels; Benjamin Dann; Hansjörg Scherberger
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Rapid control and feedback rates enhance neuroprosthetic control.

Authors:  Maryam M Shanechi; Amy L Orsborn; Helene G Moorman; Suraj Gowda; Siddharth Dangi; Jose M Carmena
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Leveraging neural dynamics to extend functional lifetime of brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Jonathan C Kao; Stephen I Ryu; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration.

Authors:  A Bolu Ajiboye; Francis R Willett; Daniel R Young; William D Memberg; Brian A Murphy; Jonathan P Miller; Benjamin L Walter; Jennifer A Sweet; Harry A Hoyen; Michael W Keith; P Hunter Peckham; John D Simeral; John P Donoghue; Leigh R Hochberg; Robert F Kirsch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Motor cortical influence relies on task-specific activity covariation.

Authors:  Claire L Warriner; Samaher Fageiry; Shreya Saxena; Rui M Costa; Andrew Miri
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 9.995

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.