| Literature DB >> 34716204 |
Marilena Melas1, Mariam T Mathew1,2,3, Mari Mori3,4, Vijayakumar Jayaraman1, Sarah A Wilson1, Cortlandt Martin4, Amanda E Jacobson-Kelly3,5, Ben J Kelly1, Vincent Magrini1,3, Elaine R Mardis1,3, Catherine E Cottrell1,2,3, Kristy Lee1,2,3.
Abstract
The methodologic approach used in next-generation sequencing (NGS) affords a high depth of coverage in genomic analysis. Inherent in the nature of genomic testing, there exists potential for identifying genomic findings that are incidental or secondary to the indication for clinical testing, with the frequency dependent on the breadth of analysis and the tissue sample under study. The interpretation and management of clinically meaningful incidental genomic findings is a pressing issue particularly in the pediatric population. Our study describes a 16-mo-old male who presented with profound global delays, brain abnormality, progressive microcephaly, and growth deficiency, as well as metopic craniosynostosis. Clinical exome sequencing (ES) trio analysis revealed the presence of two variants in the proband. The first was a de novo variant in the PPP2R1A gene (c.773G > A, p.Arg258His), which is associated with autosomal dominant (AD) intellectual disability, accounting for the proband's clinical phenotype. The second was a recurrent hotspot variant in the CBL gene (c.1111T > C, p.Tyr371His), which was present at a variant allele fraction of 11%, consistent with somatic variation in the peripheral blood sample. Germline pathogenic variants in CBL are associated with AD Noonan syndrome-like disorder with or without juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Molecular analyses using a different tissue source, buccal epithelial cells, suggest that the CBL alteration may represent a clonal population of cells restricted to leukocytes. This report highlights the laboratory methodologic and interpretative processes and clinical considerations in the setting of acquired variation detected during clinical ES in a pediatric patient.Entities:
Keywords: Dandy–Walker malformation; craniosynostosis; severe global developmental delay
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34716204 PMCID: PMC8751410 DOI: 10.1101/mcs.a006135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud ISSN: 2373-2873
Exome sequencing (ES) trio analysis variant characteristics and classification
| Gene (transcript ID) | Genomic change (GRCh37) | HGVS coding reference | HGVS protein reference | Variant type | Predicted effect | dbSNP | Genotype/inheritance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chr 19:52716329 G > A | c.773G > A | p.R258H | Missense | Likely pathogenic | rs863225094 | Heterozygous/de novo | |
| Chr 11:119148891 T > C | c.1111T > C | p.Y371H | Missense | Pathogenic | rs267606706 | Somatic |
Figure 1.PPP2R1A variant identified by ES analysis and confirmation via Sanger sequencing. (A) De novo heterozygous PPP2R1A variant visualized by the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) (reference base G in orange, variant base A in green) in the proband (top panel), with reference base detected at this position for samples from the mother (middle panel) and father (bottom panel). (B) Sanger sequencing analysis of the PPP2R1A variant visualized by Sequencher in the proband (top panel), mother (middle panel), and father (bottom panel) confirms the PPP2R1A variant is de novo in the proband.
Figure 2.Identification of CBL variant. Diagram of the CBL gene, indicating the c.1111T > C variant in exon 8. (A) Somatic heterozygous CBL variant visualized by the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) (reference base T in red, variant base C in blue) in the proband (top panel), with reference base detected at this position for samples from the mother (middle panel) and father (bottom panel). (B) Sanger sequencing analysis of the CBL variant visualized in Sequencher in the proband's buccal epithelium, exome sequencing (ES) peripheral blood sample (blood specimen 1), and post-ES peripheral blood sample (blood specimen 2). (C) Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis for the CBL variant in buccal cells, ES peripheral blood sample (blood 1), and post-ES peripheral blood sample (blood 2). The percentage of the CBL variant and total coverage is indicated for each sample.
Metrics for ES coverage
| Gene (transcript ID) | Target mean coverage | Target coverage 20× breadth (±20 bp padding around each exonic region) |
|---|---|---|
| 189× | 100% | |
| 118× | 100% |
Metrics for targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS)
| Sample | Total reads | Unique mapping reads | Target mean coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood specimen 1 | 1,818,744 | 583,440 | 210,143× |
| Blood specimen 2 | 1,942,102 | 545,189 | 235,867× |
| Buccal | 1,589,282 | 564,599 | 195,879× |