Literature DB >> 34716179

Implementation of a youth violence prevention programme in primary care.

Jessica S Roche1,2, Meredith L Philyaw-Kotov3,4, Eric Sigel5, Andria B Eisman6,7, Golfo Tzilos Wernette8, Kenneth Resnicow6, Patrick M Carter3,2,6,7, Rebecca M Cunningham3,2,6,7, Maureen A Walton3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Youth violence is an alarming public health problem, yet, violence screening and interventions are not systematically offered in primary care (PC). This paper describes data from a pilot effectiveness-implementation trial of an efficacious youth violence prevention programme (SafERteens).
METHODS: The study was conducted in two PC clinics: a university-affiliated satellite clinic and a community health centre. In phase 1, we obtained stakeholder feedback to customise the SafERteens package and enrolled a comparison group of adolescents (age 14-18) seeking care in two clinics. In phase 2, clinical staff delivered the SafERteens-PC intervention with adolescents, which is a single, behavioural health therapy session delivered one-on-one from clinic providers to youth patients, followed by text message (TM) reminders. In phase 3, we assessed planned maintenance. All participants reported past-year violent behaviour at intake and completed a 3-month follow-up assessment.
RESULTS: Based on stakeholder interviews (n=13), we created a web-based SafERteens-PC programme package, including a three-item past-year violence screen, 30 min motivational interviewing-based brief intervention delivery tool, training videos and 2 months of TM boosters. We enrolled a comparison group (n=49) first, then an intervention group (n=61). Intervention delivery characteristics varied by clinic, including completion of intervention (75.9%; 62.5%), modality (100% delivered via telehealth; 60% via telehealth/40% in-person) and enrolment in TMs (81.8%; 55.0%); 91.8% completed the follow-up. Using an intention-to-treat approach, the intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in severe peer aggression (p<0.05), anxiety (p<0.05) and substance use consequences (p<0.05) relative to the comparison group. Participant and staff feedback were positive and identified challenges to long-term implementation, such as lack of availability of reimbursement for youth violence prevention.
CONCLUSIONS: If these challenges could be addressed, routine provision of behavioural health services for violence prevention in PC could have high impact on health outcomes for adolescents. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implementation / translation; interventions; primary care; violence; youth

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34716179      PMCID: PMC9063683          DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   3.770


  30 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The role of the pediatrician in youth violence prevention in clinical practice and at the community level.

Authors:  H Spivak
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research.

Authors:  Andrew C Leon; Lori L Davis; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Brief motivational interviewing intervention for peer violence and alcohol use in teens: one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Rebecca M Cunningham; Stephen T Chermack; Marc A Zimmerman; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Frederic C Blow; Maureen A Walton
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  A scoping study of frameworks for adapting public health evidence-based interventions.

Authors:  Cam Escoffery; Erin Lebow-Skelley; Hallie Udelson; Elaine A Böing; Richard Wood; Maria E Fernandez; Patricia D Mullen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs: future directions for screening and intervention in the emergency department.

Authors:  Rebecca M Cunningham; Steven L Bernstein; Maureen Walton; Kerry Broderick; Federico E Vaca; Robert Woolard; Edward Bernstein; Fred Blow; Gail D'Onofrio
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  A Comprehensive Prevention Approach to Reducing Assault Offenses and Assault Injuries among Youth.

Authors:  Justin E Heinze; Thomas M Reischl; Mengqiao Bai; Jessica S Roche; Susan Morrel-Samuels; Rebecca M Cunningham; Marc A Zimmerman
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-02

8.  Correlates of depressive symptoms among at-risk youth presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  Megan L Ranney; Maureen Walton; Lauren Whiteside; Quyen Epstein-Ngo; Rikki Patton; Stephen Chermack; Fred Blow; Rebecca M Cunningham
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.238

9.  Protocol: Adaptive Implementation of Effective Programs Trial (ADEPT): cluster randomized SMART trial comparing a standard versus enhanced implementation strategy to improve outcomes of a mood disorders program.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Daniel Almirall; Daniel Eisenberg; Jeanette Waxmonsky; David E Goodrich; John C Fortney; JoAnn E Kirchner; Leif I Solberg; Deborah Main; Mark S Bauer; Julia Kyle; Susan A Murphy; Kristina M Nord; Marshall R Thomas
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Implementation Research: Reducing the Research-to-Practice Gap in Depression Treatment.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Mark Williams; Mark S Bauer; Patricia Arean
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.