| Literature DB >> 34715905 |
Asumi Sakaguchi1,2, Yoshiya Horimoto3,4, Hiroko Onagi2, Daiki Ikarashi5, Takayuki Nakayama5, Tetsuya Nakatsura5, Hideo Shimizu6, Kuniaki Kojima6, Takashi Yao2, Toshiharu Matsumoto1, Kanako Ogura1, Shigehisa Kitano7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-high breast tumours have a high rate of pathological complete response (pCR) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In our routine pathological diagnoses of biopsy specimens from pCR cases, we have observed a high infiltration of plasma cells (PCs). A positive correlation of PCs with favourable patient outcome has recently been reported, but little is known about how PCs contribute to local tumour immunity.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; Local immune microenvironment; Multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemistry; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Plasma cell; Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34715905 PMCID: PMC8555250 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01477-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breast Cancer Res ISSN: 1465-5411 Impact factor: 6.466
Clinicopathological features and pCR
| Variables | pCR | Non-pCR | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | |||||||
| 25 | 121 | |||||||||
| Age (mean) | 55.2 | 53.9 | 1.70* | 0.22–13.31 | 0.611 | 2.30* | 0.16–33.38 | 0.534 | ||
| Histology | ||||||||||
| NST | 24 | (96%) | 107 | (88%) | 3.14 | 0.39–25.05 | 0.28 | |||
| Others | 1 | (4%) | 14 | (12%) | ||||||
| Tumour grade | ||||||||||
| High | 15 | (60%) | 41 | (34%) | 2.93 | 1.21–7.09 | 0.017 | 2.43 | 0.83–7.40 | 0.107 |
| Low | 10 | (40%) | 80 | (66%) | ||||||
| Ki67 (%, mean) | 29.0 | 16.3 | 214.58* | 25.26–2583.97 | < 0.001 | |||||
| ER | ||||||||||
| Positive | 11 | (44%) | 78 | (64%) | 0.43 | 0.18–1.04 | 0.06 | 0.54 | 0.15–1.79 | 0.314 |
| Negative | 14 | (56%) | 43 | (36%) | ||||||
| PgR | ||||||||||
| Positive | 7 | (28%) | 63 | (52%) | 0.36 | 0.14–0.92 | 0.033 | |||
| Negative | 18 | (72%) | 58 | (48%) | ||||||
| HER2 | ||||||||||
| Positive | 14 | (56%) | 27 | (22%) | 4.43 | 1.80–10.88 | 0.001 | 5.22 | 1.86–15.53 | 0.002 |
| Negative | 11 | (44%) | 94 | (78%) | ||||||
| TIL (%, mean) | 42.0 | 22.8 | 8.49* | 2.27–32.70 | 0.002 | 9.66* | 2.17–46.07 | 0.003 | ||
| CD8 (mean) | 165.1 | 156.7 | 1.47* | 0.10–16.48 | 0.764 | |||||
| CD138 (mean) | 100.9 | 61.3 | 7.00* | 1.11–43.56 | 0.039 | |||||
ER oestrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TIL tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, NST no special type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, TIL tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, NST no special type, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval
*Range of the odds ratio
Fig. 1Plasma cell infiltration according to chemo-effect. a, b Comparisons of PC infiltration according to chemo-effect (pCR; n = 25, non-pCR; n = 121). Horizontal bars indicate mean values. Green rectangles indicate cases in which samples were further investigated with mfIHC. c, d PC infiltration according to chemo-effect and HR status. c HR-positive patients (n = 90) and d HR-negative patients (n = 56). e Comparisons of PC infiltration according to chemo-effect in another cohort of HR-negative patients (n = 71) from Juntendo University Hospital (JUH)
Fig. 2Comparison of immune cell profiling on T cell panel according to chemo-effect. a Comparisons of immune cells on T cell panel according to chemo-effect. We compared grade 3, i.e., pCR (n = 25), and grade 0 (n = 10) tumours employing mfIHC. Assessments in cancer and stromal areas are separately indicated. b Representative images of CD3+CD8+ T cell infiltrations by mfIHC. Cytokeratin (orange), CD3 (yellow), and CD8 (red)
Fig. 3Comparison of immune cell profiling on B cell panel according to chemo-effect. a Comparisons of immune cells on B cell panel according to chemo-effect. Expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells is also shown. b Representative images of PC infiltrations by mfIHC. Cytokeratin (orange), CD20 (blue), CD38 (magenta), and CD79a (yellow)
Clinicopathological features and disease-free survival
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | HR | 95%CI | |||
| Age | 0.67* | 0.15–2.89 | 0.590 | 0.52* | 0.10–2.62 | 0.426 |
| Histology | ||||||
| NST vs others | 0.57 | 0.25–1.28 | 0.172 | |||
| Residual tumour size in breast | 5.30* | 1.68–14.44 | 0.006 | 4.11* | 1.01–14.86 | 0.048 |
| Residual tumour in lymph node | ||||||
| Positive vs negative | 2.98 | 1.62–5.49 | < 0.001 | 2.54 | 1.29–5.09 | 0.007 |
| Tumour grade | ||||||
| High vs low | 1.27 | 0.69–2.31 | 0.444 | 1.33 | 0.63–2.75 | 0.443 |
| Ki67 | 3.22* | 0.91–10.67 | 0.070 | |||
| ER | ||||||
| Positive vs negative | 0.91 | 0.49–1.67 | 0.758 | 0.66 | 0.26–1.62 | 0.360 |
| PgR | ||||||
| Positive vs negative | 1.04 | 0.57–1.88 | 0.905 | |||
| HER2 | ||||||
| Positive vs negative | 0.93 | 0.48–1.82 | 0.838 | 1.04 | 0.45–2.34 | 0.920 |
| TIL | 0.96* | 0.32–2.50 | 0.938 | 1.22* | 0.38–3.52 | 0.730 |
| CD8 | 1.81* | 0.30–8.60 | 0.497 | |||
| CD138 | 0.36* | 0.06–1.63 | 0.201 | |||
ER oestrogen receptor, PgR progesterone receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TIL tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, NST no special type, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
*Range of the hazard ratio
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier curves of disease-free survival according to plasma cell infiltration. Disease-free survival according to PC infiltration in a all participants (n = 146), b HR-positive patients (n = 90), and c HR-negative patients (n = 56). Light green lines indicate the PC-high group, while grey lines represent the PC-low group