Soo-Young Yu1, Eunyoung E Suh2, Yun-Mi Kim3, Thi Anh Phuong Nguyen4, Oyungoo Badamdorj5, Yoonhee Seok6, Soyoung Jang7, Jeonghee Ahn8. 1. Department of Nursing, Jeonju University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: sooyoung0809@gmail.com. 2. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: esuh@snu.ac.kr. 3. College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ymkim@gachon.ac.kr. 4. Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue City, Vietnam. Electronic address: ntaphuong@hueuni.edu.vn. 5. School of Nursing, Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Electronic address: oyungoo@mnums.edu.mn. 6. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: uri303@snu.ac.kr. 7. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jsy8824@snu.ac.kr. 8. College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: ajh627@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
AIM: This study evaluated a practical competency evaluation for nursing students in three Asian countries using tablet PC-based tests. The need to evaluate practical competencies in a non-face-to-face manner continues to pose challenges in nursing education. DESIGN: This study presents descriptive comparative research on a tablet PC-based evaluation of practical competencies in three countries. METHODS: tablet PC-based clinical practice competency evaluation was conducted among nursing college students in Korea, Vietnam and Mongolia. In total, 124 students answered 65 questions for practical competency evaluation and items on its usefulness. RESULTS: Students from Korea had the highest score of nursing competencies (41.6 points; n = 59, SD 6.02), followed by those from Vietnam (26.3 points; n = 30, SD 4.97) and Mongolia (18.4 points; n = 35, SD 5.36). Scores for usability showed an inverse relationship with competency scores. Questions incorporating video showed the lowest proportion of low-discrimination items. CONCLUSIONS: This research recognized that using video which provides contextual elements can increase item discrimination. These findings suggest that incorporating video into evaluation items in tablet-PC-based tests is useful for international comparison.
AIM: This study evaluated a practical competency evaluation for nursing students in three Asian countries using tablet PC-based tests. The need to evaluate practical competencies in a non-face-to-face manner continues to pose challenges in nursing education. DESIGN: This study presents descriptive comparative research on a tablet PC-based evaluation of practical competencies in three countries. METHODS: tablet PC-based clinical practice competency evaluation was conducted among nursing college students in Korea, Vietnam and Mongolia. In total, 124 students answered 65 questions for practical competency evaluation and items on its usefulness. RESULTS: Students from Korea had the highest score of nursing competencies (41.6 points; n = 59, SD 6.02), followed by those from Vietnam (26.3 points; n = 30, SD 4.97) and Mongolia (18.4 points; n = 35, SD 5.36). Scores for usability showed an inverse relationship with competency scores. Questions incorporating video showed the lowest proportion of low-discrimination items. CONCLUSIONS: This research recognized that using video which provides contextual elements can increase item discrimination. These findings suggest that incorporating video into evaluation items in tablet-PC-based tests is useful for international comparison.