Literature DB >> 34714532

Neural is Fundamental: Neural Stemness as the Ground State of Cell Tumorigenicity and Differentiation Potential.

Ying Cao1,2.   

Abstract

Tumorigenic cells are similar to neural stem cells or embryonic neural cells in regulatory networks, tumorigenicity and pluripotent differentiation potential. By integrating the evidence from developmental biology, tumor biology and evolution, I will make a detailed discussion on the observations and propose that neural stemness underlies two coupled cell properties, tumorigenicity and pluripotent differentiation potential. Neural stemness property of tumorigenic cells can hopefully integrate different observations/concepts underlying tumorigenesis. Neural stem cells and tumorigenic cells share regulatory networks; both exhibit neural stemness, tumorigenicity and pluripotent differentiation potential; both depend on expression or activation of ancestral genes; both rely primarily on aerobic glycolytic metabolism; both can differentiate into various cells/tissues that are derived from three germ layers, leading to tumor formation resembling severely disorganized or more degenerated process of embryonic tissue differentiation; both are enriched in long genes with more splice variants that provide more plastic scaffolds for cell differentiation, etc. Neural regulatory networks, which include higher levels of basic machineries of cell physiological functions and developmental programs, work concertedly to define a basic state with fast cell cycle and proliferation. This is predestined by the evolutionary advantage of neural state, the ground or initial state for multicellularity with adaptation to an ancient environment. Tumorigenesis might represent a process of restoration of neural ground state, thereby restoring a state with fast proliferation and pluripotent differentiation potential in somatic cells. Tumorigenesis and pluripotent differentiation potential might be better understood from understanding neural stemness, and cancer therapy should benefit more from targeting neural stemness.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer stem cell; Differentiation potential; Evo-devo; Multicellularity; Neural default model; Neural ground state; Neural stemness; Tumorigenic cell; Tumorigenicity; Unicellularity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34714532     DOI: 10.1007/s12015-021-10275-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep        ISSN: 2629-3277            Impact factor:   5.739


  161 in total

Review 1.  A note from history: landmarks in history of cancer, part 1.

Authors:  Steven I Hajdu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Neural differentiation of Xenopus laevis ectoderm takes place after disaggregation and delayed reaggregation without inducer.

Authors:  H Grunz; L Tacke
Journal:  Cell Differ Dev       Date:  1989-12

Review 3.  Theories of cancer origin.

Authors:  Roman Paduch
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 4.  Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies.

Authors:  Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Clonal analysis of mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  S F Godsave; J M Slack
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 6.  Dedifferentiation and reprogramming: origins of cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Dinorah Friedmann-Morvinski; Inder M Verma
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Origin of Cancer: An Information, Energy, and Matter Disease.

Authors:  Rainer G Hanselmann; Cornelius Welter
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-11-17

Review 8.  Intra-tumor heterogeneity from a cancer stem cell perspective.

Authors:  Pramudita R Prasetyanti; Jan Paul Medema
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 9.  Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity.

Authors:  Corbin E Meacham; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca A Burrell; Nicholas McGranahan; Jiri Bartek; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.