| Literature DB >> 34712298 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study used the optimized nuclear regression reconstruction algorithm to explore the value of three-dimensional perineal ultrasound evaluation of the effect of caesarean delivery and caesarean section on the anal sphincter complex of primipara.Entities:
Keywords: Algorithm; Anal sphincter complex; Caesarean section; Nuclear regression reconstruction three-dimensional ultrasound image; Vaginal delivery
Year: 2021 PMID: 34712298 PMCID: PMC8520362 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.6-WIT.4859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Comparison of general conditions of maternal and neonates between the caesarean section and the caesarean section.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
|
| |||
| Natural birth group (n = 77) | 29.4±3.0 | 162.91±3.69 | 68.78±4.53 | 3.22±0.30 |
| Caesarean section group (n = 80) | 30.1±3.2 | 163.08±4.02 | 69.51±2.85 | 3.21±0.28 |
| t value | 0.4 | 0.26 | 1.2 | -0.23 |
| P value | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.23 | 0.82 |
Fig.1Three-dimensional figure of human organs.
(a) Initial filling stage. (b) Regression stage.
Fig.2Maternity, 28 years old, 42 days after mild anal incontinence. Perineal three-dimensional ultrasound showed continuous interruption of EAS by perineum), located at 10 o’clock.
Comparison of IAS proximal, middle and distal plane thickness measurements between caesarean section and caesarean section.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Natural birth group (n = 77) | 2.05±0.54 | 1.86±0.53 | 2.15±0.57 | 1.53±0.60 | 2.25±0.58 | 1.83±0.55 |
| Caesarean Section (n = 80) | 2.21±0.67 | 2.11±0.76 | 2.17±0.58 | 1.78±0.55 | 2.40±0.59 | 1.73±0.48 |
| t value | 1.6 | 2.32 | 0.21 | 2.7 | 1.61 | -1.19 |
| P value | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.83 | <0.01 | 0.11 | 0.23 |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Natural birth group (n = 77) | 2.33±0.51 | 1.65±0.63 | 2.13±0.60 | 2.04±0.59 | 2.23±0.51 | 1.55±0.56 |
| Caesarean Section (n = 80) | 2.53±0.61 | 2.01±0.57 | 2.19±0.59 | 1.98±0.57 | 2.37±0.54 | 1.72±0.60 |
| t value | 2.31 | 3.7 | 0.68 | -0.76 | 1.67 | 1.82 |
| P value | 0.02 | <0.01 | 0.5 | 0.45 | 0.1 | 0.07 |
Comparison of thickness measurements between the distal EAS plane and the central plane of the caesarean and caesarean section.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Natural birth group (n = 77) | 2.93±0.82 | 2.04±0.59 | 3.12±0.84 | 1.04±0.27 | 7.00±1.40 | 7.21±1.39 |
| Caesarean Section (n = 80) | 2.87±0.80 | 2.73±0.88 | 3.23±0.77 | 1.87±0.55 | 7.37±1.51 | 7.34±1.71 |
| t value | -0.52 | -0.48 | 0.8 | 12.15 | 1.62 | 0.55 |
| P value | 0.6 | 0.63 | 0.43 | <0.01 | 0.11 | 0.58 |