Literature DB >> 34712098

Attentional Capture from Looming Alters Perception.

Alexander Sugarman1, Regina E McGlinchey1,2, Francesca C Fortenbaugh1,2.   

Abstract

Studies suggest looming motion represents a special class of attentional capture stimulus due to behavioral urgency: the need to act upon objects moving toward us in an environment. In particular, one theory suggests that faster reaction times to targets cued by looming relative to receding motion are driven by post-attentional, motor-priming processes beyond the attentional capture effects seen with other stimulus qualities such as color pop-out. The present study tested this theory using a relative size judgment task where targets were pre-cued by looming and receding optic flow fields. Results show systematic increases in the perceived size of targets that were cued by looming flow fields, consistent with previous attentional capture studies using onset cues. These results challenge theories attributing behavioral changes from looming motion to motor-priming alone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional Capture; Behavioral Urgency; Looming Motion; Perceptual Distortion; Relative Size Judgments

Year:  2021        PMID: 34712098      PMCID: PMC8547320          DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2021.1874583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis cogn        ISSN: 1350-6285


  24 in total

1.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion onset captures attention.

Authors:  Richard A Abrams; Shawn E Christ
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

3.  Goal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jonathan Sit; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Stephen R Arnott
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-05-08

6.  Prioritization of looming and receding objects: equal slopes, different intercepts.

Authors:  Paul A Skarratt; Geoff G Cole; Angus R H Gellatly
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Objects on a collision path with the observer demand attention.

Authors:  Jeffrey Y Lin; Steven Franconeri; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-07

8.  Where does attention go when it moves? Spatial properties and locus of the attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  Anna A Kosovicheva; Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Spatial attention effects in macaque area V4.

Authors:  C E Connor; D C Preddie; J L Gallant; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Alexander Sugarman; Lynn C Robertson; Michael Esterman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.