| Literature DB >> 34712046 |
Fiorenza Rancan1, Xiao Guo1, Keerthana Rajes2, Polytimi Sidiropoulou1, Fatemeh Zabihi2, Luisa Hoffmann1, Sabrina Hadam1, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi1, Eckart Rühl3, Rainer Haag2, Annika Vogt1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Rapamycin (Rapa) is an immunosuppressive macrolide that inhibits the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activity. Thanks to its anti-proliferative effects towards different cell types, including keratinocytes and T cells, Rapa shows promise in the treatment of skin diseases characterized by cell hyperproliferation. However, Rapa skin penetration is limited due to its lipophilic nature (log P = 4.3) and high molecular weight (MW = 914 g/mol). In previous studies, new microenvironment-sensitive core multishell (CMS) nanocarriers capable of sensing the redox state of inflamed skin were developed as more efficient and selective vehicles for macrolide delivery to inflamed skin.Entities:
Keywords: dermatology; drug release; psoriasis; redox-sensitive nanoparticles; sirolimus; stratum corneum barrier
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34712046 PMCID: PMC8548260 DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S330716
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Nanomedicine ISSN: 1176-9114
Figure 1Effect of SP treatment on skin barrier proteins. Ex vivo skin was treated for 16 h with topically applied trypsin (+ SP), while control skin was treated with saline (−SP). Immunohistostaining of CDSN (A–A”), Occl (B–B”), and ZO-1 (C–C”) was performed on skin sections from three donors (D1-D3). Representative pictures of sections from saline-treated (A–C) and SP-treated (A’–C’) skin show lower fluorescence intensity in skin incubated with SP. Scale bars = 50 µm. The analysis of several sections from three different donors are summarized in (A”–C”). Statistically lower MFI values were found for sections of SP-pretreated skin (***p < 0.001).
Figure 2Effects of SP treatment on skin redox state and permeability. (A) Representative images of cryosections from skin samples after 18 h topical treatment with saline (−SP) or trypsin (+SP). Thiol groups were stained with ICC-maleimide. Scale bar = 25 µm. MFI analysis (B) was done in at least 30 different skin areas in SC and VE from different skin sections (n = 2). The effect of SP pre-treatment on skin permeability and CMS nanocarrier-mediated delivery of AttoOxa was tested by measuring the MFI in the SC (C) and VE (D) of skin samples incubated with or without SP (+SP, −SP) and treated with AttoOxa-loaded nanocarriers or free AttoOxa in 2.5% HEC gels (applied dye amount 0.2 µg/cm2) (n = 3). Statistical significance was found with *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Anti-inflammatory effects of Rapa loaded on redox-sensitive CMS nanocarriers. (A) A trans-well set-up was used to co-culture ex vivo human skin and Jurkat T cells. Skin was pre-treated with SP to induce barrier-impairment and to create an oxidative environment. T cells were activated with PHA, IL-17A and IL-22. (B) Expression of activation markers (CD45, CD69) and phosphorylation of the ribosomal protein S6 (pRP-S6, mTOR pathway) by Jurkat cells co-cultured with skin treated with the different Rapa-formulations. Representative histograms of the flow cytometry analysis and average of positive cells within the range gate are shown (n = 3). (C and D) Released of the inflammatory cytokine IL-2 by Jurkat cells co-cultured with SP-treated (C) and SP-untreated (D) skin 24 h following topical application of Rapa formulations (applied Rapa doses: 10 µg/cm2). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4Normalized values of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 (A and B), IL-8 (C and D), and IL-1α (E and F) extracted from the epidermis of skin pre-treated with trypsin (+ SP, A, C and E) or with saline (−SP, B, D and F) and incubated with the investigated Rapa formulations (24h, applied Rapa doses: 10 µg/cm2).