Literature DB >> 34711972

DeepLC can predict retention times for peptides that carry as-yet unseen modifications.

Robbin Bouwmeester1,2, Ralf Gabriels1,2, Niels Hulstaert1,2, Lennart Martens3,4, Sven Degroeve1,2.   

Abstract

The inclusion of peptide retention time prediction promises to remove peptide identification ambiguity in complex liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry identification workflows. However, due to the way peptides are encoded in current prediction models, accurate retention times cannot be predicted for modified peptides. This is especially problematic for fledgling open searches, which will benefit from accurate retention time prediction for modified peptides to reduce identification ambiguity. We present DeepLC, a deep learning peptide retention time predictor using peptide encoding based on atomic composition that allows the retention time of (previously unseen) modified peptides to be predicted accurately. We show that DeepLC performs similarly to current state-of-the-art approaches for unmodified peptides and, more importantly, accurately predicts retention times for modifications not seen during training. Moreover, we show that DeepLC's ability to predict retention times for any modification enables potentially incorrect identifications to be flagged in an open search of a wide variety of proteome data.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34711972     DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01301-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Methods        ISSN: 1548-7091            Impact factor:   28.547


  45 in total

1.  Prediction of chromatographic retention and protein identification in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Magnus Palmblad; Margareta Ramström; Karin E Markides; Per Håkansson; Jonas Bergquist
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Ruedi Aebersold; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Training, selection, and robust calibration of retention time models for targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Luminita Moruz; Daniela Tomazela; Lukas Käll
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 4.  Peptide retention time prediction.

Authors:  Luminita Moruz; Lukas Käll
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 10.946

5.  Chromatographic retention time prediction for posttranslationally modified peptides.

Authors:  Luminita Moruz; An Staes; Joseph M Foster; Maria Hatzou; Evy Timmerman; Lennart Martens; Lukas Käll
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Application of modern reversed-phase peptide retention prediction algorithms to the Houghten and DeGraw dataset: peptide helicity and its effect on prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Janice Reimer; Vic Spicer; Oleg V Krokhin
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS.

Authors:  Annette Michalski; Juergen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid chromatography on the basis of amino acid composition.

Authors:  J L Meek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Now, More Than Ever, Proteomics Needs Better Chromatography.

Authors:  Evgenia Shishkova; Alexander S Hebert; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 10.304

10.  Chromatogram libraries improve peptide detection and quantification by data independent acquisition mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Brian C Searle; Lindsay K Pino; Jarrett D Egertson; Ying S Ting; Robert T Lawrence; Brendan X MacLean; Judit Villén; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of peptide mass spectral libraries with machine learning.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 68.164

2.  Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Proteoform Retention and Migration Time Prediction in Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Wenrong Chen; Elijah N McCool; Liangliang Sun; Yong Zang; Xia Ning; Xiaowen Liu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 5.370

3.  Statistical analysis of isocratic chromatographic data using Bayesian modeling.

Authors:  Agnieszka Kamedulska; Łukasz Kubik; Paweł Wiczling
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.478

4.  Beyond Protein Sequence: Protein Isomerization in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Harrison Specht; Nikolai Slavov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Misincorporation Proteomics Technologies: A Review.

Authors:  Joel R Steele; Carly J Italiano; Connor R Phillips; Jake P Violi; Lisa Pu; Kenneth J Rodgers; Matthew P Padula
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2021-01-21

6.  A comprehensive LFQ benchmark dataset on modern day acquisition strategies in proteomics.

Authors:  Bart Van Puyvelde; Simon Daled; Sander Willems; Ralf Gabriels; Anne Gonzalez de Peredo; Karima Chaoui; Emmanuelle Mouton-Barbosa; David Bouyssié; Kurt Boonen; Christopher J Hughes; Lee A Gethings; Yasset Perez-Riverol; Nic Bloomfield; Stephen Tate; Odile Schiltz; Lennart Martens; Dieter Deforce; Maarten Dhaenens
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 6.444

7.  Prosit Transformer: A transformer for Prediction of MS2 Spectrum Intensities.

Authors:  Markus Ekvall; Patrick Truong; Wassim Gabriel; Mathias Wilhelm; Lukas Käll
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.370

8.  DIAmeter: matching peptides to data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Yang Young Lu; Jeff Bilmes; Ricard A Rodriguez-Mias; Judit Villén; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Prediction of Peptide Collision Cross Sections in Ion Mobility Spectrometry.

Authors:  Yulia V Samukhina; Dmitriy D Matyushin; Oksana I Grinevich; Aleksey K Buryak
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-19

10.  MSLibrarian: Optimized Predicted Spectral Libraries for Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics.

Authors:  Marc Isaksson; Christofer Karlsson; Thomas Laurell; Agnete Kirkeby; Moritz Heusel
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.