Literature DB >> 34711536

Resilience of the respiratory microbiome in controlled adult RSV challenge study.

Leah Cuthbertson1, Phillip James1, Maximillian S Habibi1, Ryan S Thwaites1, Allan Paras1, Christopher Chiu2, Peter J M Openshaw1, William O C Cookson1, Miriam F Moffatt3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34711536      PMCID: PMC8754103          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01932-2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the commonest cause of acute lower respiratory tract infection (RTI) in infants, resulting in seasonal surges in hospital admissions [1]. In addition to its impact in childhood, RSV is increasingly recognised as a cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly persons [2]. The virus is highly contagious and regularly causes reinfections, despite limited genetic diversity [3]. Safe and effective vaccines have so far proven elusive [2]. Severe infantile bronchiolitis is associated with recurrent wheeze and asthma in later childhood [4]. One possible explanation is that RSV infection causes lasting changes in the respiratory microbial community leading to secondary effects on physiology and immunity. Alternatively, it has been proposed that disordered microbial communities predispose to severe RSV disease [5]. Longitudinal birth cohort studies have demonstrated that frequent RTIs in early life are associated with a perturbed respiratory microbiota, dominated by Moraxella, that may precede viral infections. These studies indicate associations between the respiratory microbiota and viral infection [6]. Nonetheless, the issues of cause and effect have been difficult to resolve in observational studies. To determine the effect of RSV infection on the respiratory microbiome, we inoculated 37 healthy non-smoking adults between 18 and 50 years of age with an established RSV challenge inoculum, Memphis 37 (RSV-A M37) [7]. We anticipated that infection would result in significant changes in the bacterial community within the upper respiratory tract. Baseline samples were collected prior to participant inoculation by intranasal drops of Memphis 37 [8]. Subjects were quarantined for 10 days post-infection and sampled daily [9]. Participants returned post-quarantine for further sampling at days 14 and 28. The study was approved by the UK National Research Ethics Services (study numbers 10/H0711/94 and 11/LO/1826) and written informed consent was provided by all subjects [10]. Endpoint titre of IgA against RSV was determined from nasal wash samples [7]. Cytokine and chemokine inflammatory mediators within nasosorption eluates were quantified by MSD multiplex immunoassay [10] (MesoScale Discovery, Rockville, MD, USA). DNA was extracted from oropharyngeal swabs; SYBR green qPCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed [11]. Sequences were submitted to the European Nucleotide Database, project number PRJEB28323. Sequence processing was carried out as previously described [11]. All further analysis was carried out in R, version 3.3.2. Enrolled volunteers showed one of three outcomes: clinical cold with RSV detection (determined by qPCR [10]) and/or virus-specific IgA production alongside a cumulative self-reported symptom score over a 14-day period (n=17) [7]; asymptomatic infection (n=6) or no infection (n=14) (figure 1). No significant differences in participant demographics (age, sex, ethnicity; p>0.05) were observed between outcome groups [10]. Between viral inoculation and day 3, only low levels of RSV were detected in the participants’ respiratory tracts. At day 3 viral load increased in patients who went on to develop symptoms. Day 7 was the peak of viral infection and viral load fell thereafter. At day 28, no patients had any sign of clinical infection and viral load was not measured [10].
FIGURE 1

Mean change in viral load (by qPCR), bacterial load (by qPCR) and alpha diversity (three measures Richness, Shannon, Simpson) over the course of the study for the three groups: clinical cold (infected), asymptomatic infected, and uninfected. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Mean change in viral load (by qPCR), bacterial load (by qPCR) and alpha diversity (three measures Richness, Shannon, Simpson) over the course of the study for the three groups: clinical cold (infected), asymptomatic infected, and uninfected. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. Prior to viral inoculation, there were no significant differences in bacterial alpha diversity (Richness, p=0.948; Shannon, p=0.263; Simpsons, p=0.166) or beta diversity (Bray–Curtis dissimilarity, R2=0.055, p=0.087) between the three outcome groups [10]. Significant differences between viral loads were seen between the uninfected and clinical cold groups at days 5, 6, 7 and 8 (p(adjusted)<0.001) (figure 1). Significant differences were also seen between the asymptomatic infected group and the clinical cold group on days 7 and 8 (p(adjusted)=0.03 and 0.04, respectively); the mean viral load at day 2 was higher in the asymptomatic infected group, despite not going on to develop clinical colds. Bacterial load in the asymptomatic infected group fluctuated more than in the other groups in the first 4 days of infection (figure 1); these changes were not significant and may reflect the low number of cases in the asymptomatic group (n=6). No significant differences in bacterial load, alpha diversity measures or species turnover were observed between groups over the course of viral infection. Repeated measure correlations were carried out between bacterial diversity measures and the full set of cytokine measurements. No significant correlations were observed when the whole dataset was compared or when it was subdivided based on clinical symptoms. In addition, no significant correlations were found between bacterial diversity measures and patient symptom score or viral load. Analysis of the respiratory microbiome in healthy adults revealed that, contrary to results reported in children, no significant changes in the bacterial community were seen over the course of RSV infection. Initial investigation of differences in the bacterial community at baseline revealed no significant differences in bacterial load, diversity or community composition, suggesting that the bacterial community at baseline did not have a significant effect on the course of viral infection. A post hoc power analysis based on the effect size seen in the baseline samples (f=0.23) suggested that using the conventional power of 0.80, n=62 per group would be required to identify significant differences in Shannon diversity between the three groups. It is possible therefore that a larger study would be able to detect more subtle changes in the bacterial community. Indicator species analysis and DESeq2 were used to investigate operational taxonomic units (OTUs) that may influence the outcome of viral infection. This analysis was carried out at the key time points in the viral infection, baseline, days 3 (the start of concerted viral replication), 7 (peak viral replication) and 28. Although several OTUs were statistically significant by these analyses, none stood up to further OUT-specific investigation. Further analysis at phylum level revealed no significant differences between outcome groups. No significant correlations between changes in the microbial community and changes in cytokine measurements were seen, suggesting that the microbial community within the respiratory tract is resilient to RSV-mediated changes in the inflammatory environment of the upper respiratory tract in healthy adult volunteers. Considering the number of participants within the present study, further investigation using a larger set of subjects would be needed to confirm these observations, although there are ethical challenges. Previous studies have focused on exploring the microbiome in infants, showing a positive association between Haemophilus-, Moraxella- and Streptococcus-dominated nasal microbiota and infection severity [12-14]. Our study of healthy adults did not confirm these reported microbial changes. This may be due to the maturity and relative stability of the immune system and microbial community in these individuals, unlike those of the infant population, or the milder disease experienced by healthy adults. In a human rhinovirus (HRV) challenge study of induced sputum, Molyneaux et al. [15] found that the bacterial communities of healthy individuals were stable during the course of infection. In contrast, using nasal lavage fluid, Allen et al. [16] found significant changes in two genera (Neisseria and Propionibacterium) between infected and non-infected adults. These divergent results may be in part be due to the sampling site, as it has been previously shown that the bacterial community of the throat is more closely related to the lower respiratory tract than the nasal community [17]. Including both nasal and throat samples may be of value in future studies. Controlled human infection challenges are essential to understand disease pathogenesis and underpin eventual vaccine development. There are, however, substantial ethical issues associated with exposing healthy individuals to infectious risk. As a result, these studies must be conscientiously designed to minimise risks [18]. When considering these parameters, sample sizes are necessarily limited. This provides a challenge for the analysis of highly variable microbiome data, making interpretation difficult. Despite these limitations, the present study provides important information about the resilience of the microbiome in healthy adults to RSV perturbations and suggests that comorbidities may have an important effect on the bacterial community within the lungs of vulnerable individuals, as observed in studies of natural infections. This one-page PDF can be shared freely online. Shareable PDF ERJ-01932-2021.Shareable
  18 in total

1.  Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract.

Authors:  Emily S Charlson; Kyle Bittinger; Andrew R Haas; Ayannah S Fitzgerald; Ian Frank; Anjana Yadav; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Advances in RSV vaccine research and development - A global agenda.

Authors:  Deborah Higgins; Carrie Trujillo; Cheryl Keech
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Maturation of the Infant Respiratory Microbiota, Environmental Drivers, and Health Consequences. A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Astrid A T M Bosch; Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen Piters; Marlies A van Houten; Mei Ling J N Chu; Giske Biesbroek; Jolanda Kool; Paula Pernet; Pieter-Kees C M de Groot; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Bart J F Keijser; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Debby Bogaert
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Nasopharyngeal Microbiota, Host Transcriptome, and Disease Severity in Children with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection.

Authors:  Wouter A A de Steenhuijsen Piters; Santtu Heinonen; Raiza Hasrat; Eleonora Bunsow; Bennett Smith; Maria-Carmen Suarez-Arrabal; Damien Chaussabel; Daniel M Cohen; Elisabeth A M Sanders; Octavio Ramilo; Debby Bogaert; Asuncion Mejias
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Outgrowth of the bacterial airway microbiome after rhinovirus exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Philip L Molyneaux; Patrick Mallia; Michael J Cox; Joseph Footitt; Saffron A G Willis-Owen; Daniel Homola; Maria-Belen Trujillo-Torralbo; Sarah Elkin; Onn Min Kon; William O C Cookson; Miriam F Moffatt; Sebastian L Johnston
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Neutrophilic inflammation in the respiratory mucosa predisposes to RSV infection.

Authors:  Maximillian S Habibi; Ryan S Thwaites; Christopher Chiu; Peter J M Openshaw; Meiping Chang; Agnieszka Jozwik; Allan Paras; Freja Kirsebom; Augusto Varese; Amber Owen; Leah Cuthbertson; Phillip James; Tanushree Tunstall; David Nickle; Trevor T Hansel; Miriam F Moffatt; Cecilia Johansson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 63.714

7.  Characterization of the nasopharyngeal microbiota in health and during rhinovirus challenge.

Authors:  E Kaitlynn Allen; Alex F Koeppel; J Owen Hendley; Stephen D Turner; Birgit Winther; Michèle M Sale
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 14.650

8.  The impact of persistent bacterial bronchitis on the pulmonary microbiome of children.

Authors:  Leah Cuthbertson; Vanessa Craven; Lynne Bingle; William O C M Cookson; Mark L Everard; Miriam F Moffatt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Absorption of Nasal and Bronchial Fluids: Precision Sampling of the Human Respiratory Mucosa and Laboratory Processing of Samples.

Authors:  Ryan S Thwaites; Hannah C Jarvis; Nehmat Singh; Akhilesh Jha; Andy Pritchard; Hailing Fan; Tanushree Tunstall; Joan Nanan; Simon Nadel; Onn Min Kon; Peter J Openshaw; Trevor T Hansel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-21       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Microbiome-Transcriptome Interactions Related to Severity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection.

Authors:  Abhijeet R Sonawane; Liang Tian; Chin-Yi Chu; Xing Qiu; Lu Wang; Jeanne Holden-Wiltse; Alex Grier; Steven R Gill; Mary T Caserta; Ann R Falsey; David J Topham; Edward E Walsh; Thomas J Mariani; Scott T Weiss; Edwin K Silverman; Kimberly Glass; Yang-Yu Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Alterations in the respiratory tract microbiome in COVID-19: current observations and potential significance.

Authors:  Carter Merenstein; Frederic D Bushman; Ronald G Collman
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 16.837

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.