| Literature DB >> 34711420 |
Rocío de Diego-Cordero1, Lorena López-Gómez2, Giancarlo Lucchetti3, Bárbara Badanta4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Spiritual care has a positive influence when patients are subjected to serious illnesses, and critically ill situations such as the case of the COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Critical care; Emergency; Health professionals; Qualitative research; Spiritual care; Spirituality
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34711420 PMCID: PMC8226065 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.06.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nurs Outlook ISSN: 0029-6554 Impact factor: 3.250
Characteristics of Experts for Delphi Panel
| Code | Age | Gender | Residence | Highest academic level | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expert 1 | 40 | Woman | Murcia | PhD | Medical anthropology / Expert in spiritual health, cross-cultural spirituality and mindfulness |
| Expert 2 | 59 | Woman | Seville | PhD | Nurse in ICU/University professor |
| Expert 3 | 63 | Woman | Seville | PhD | Nurse (specialist in paliative care, spirituality and humanization of care) / Anthropologist /Social Worker/ University professor |
| Expert 4 | 57 | Woman | Seville | MRcN | Nurse in Emergency Care/University professor |
| Expert 5 | 43 | Woman | Seville | PhD | Nursing Researcher (specialist in paliative care and humanization of care) /University professor in religious institution |
| Expert 6 | 42 | Woman | Seville | PhD | Nursing Researcher (specialist in spiritual health) /University professor in religious institution |
| Expert 7 | 33 | Woman | Seville | PhD | Nurse in ICU/ Research in spiritual health and transcultural nursing / University professor |
| Expert 8 | 59 | Man | Granada | PhD | Psychologist / Expert in health promotion and spiritual health |
| Expert 9 | 33 | Woman | Seville | MRcN | Nursing Researcher in spiritual health |
| Expert 10 | 41 | Man | Brazil | PhD | Physician Researcher (specialist in spirituality and health) / University professor |
Interview Guide
| What do you consider to be S / R person? What does the S / R imply? Do you consider the S / R in your life? How? Trought, feeling or practice? |
| Have you ever heard the term spiritual health or spiritual care? What ideas do you have or know about spiritual activities or care? |
| Do you think that S / R influences in any way the health of patients, their coping with the disease, or even the professional-patient relationship? If so, how do you think it influence? Do you have any experiences or know some examples? |
| Have you ever discussed S / R with the patients? If you have experience, could you comment on any situation in which you provided spiritual care? Do you feel a desire or need to do so? (If “Yes”, How often? When or in what specific situations?) |
| Do you consider yourself prepared to address S / R issues with your patients? |
| What is your experience and what do you need to face the COVID-19 pandemic? Are there any resources or help to provide spiritual care? Are they being launched or used? |
| What is the role of your spiritual or religious beliefs at this time of crisis due to COVID-19? Have aspects of S / R emerged in yourself, your colleagues, patients or relatives to cope with the situation of COVID-19? |
| What reasons discourage you from addressing S / R with your patients? How do you think it could be done? How do you think spiritual care in hospitals could be improved? |
| Do you think that nursing students should be prepared during their university career to address S / R with patients? |
| Have you ever participated in any training activity on S / R or “Health and Spirituality”? Any example? |
| Is current university education adequate to address S / R beliefs with patients? For which situations do you consider the training most necessary? |
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ): 32-Item Checklist
| No | Item | Guide questions/description | Response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity | |||
| Personal Characteristics | |||
| 1. | Interviewer/facilitator | Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? | All the interviews were conducted by the one author, LL. |
| 2. | Credentials | What were the researcher's credentials? E.g. PhD, MD | BB, RDC and GL were PhD. LL was a nursing student. |
| 3. | Occupation | What was their occupation at the time of the study? | Researcher's occupations at the time of the study: student and research professor. |
| 4. | Gender | Was the researcher male or female? | BB, RDC and LL were females. GL was male. |
| 5. | Experience and training | What experience or training did the researcher have? | All researchers had experience in carrying out qualitative research. BB has been trained to conduct interviews and RDC has training in social research. LL has been trained to analyze data of qualitative research. |
| Relationship with participants | |||
| 6. | Relationship established | Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? | No, there wasn't. |
| 7. | Participant knowledge of the interviewer | What did the participants know about the researcher? e.g. personal goals, reasons for doing the research | Name, occupation, reasons for doing the research. |
| 8. | Interviewer characteristics | What characteristics were reported about the interviewer/facilitator? e.g. Bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the research topic | Name, occupation, contact method, reasons for doing the research. |
| Domain 2: Study design | |||
| Theoretical framework | |||
| 9. | Methodological orientation and Theory | What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? e.g. grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis | Phenomenological and ethnographic approach with a discourse and content analysis. |
| Participant selection | |||
| 10. | Sampling | How were participants selected? e.g. purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball | Purposive and snowball sampling procedure. |
| 11. | Method of approach | How were participants approached? e.g. face-to-face, telephone, mail, email | Interviews occurred at a time of convenience to the participant, using telephone calls, e-mail or other web meetings. |
| 12. | Sample size | How many participants were in the study? | 19 nursing professionals from ICU and emergency services |
| 13. | Non-participation | How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? | None |
| Setting | |||
| 14. | Setting of data collection | Where was the data collected? e.g. home, clinic, workplace | The activation of the “State of Emergency” in Spain did not allowed face-to-face meetings with health professionals, nor mobility between cities. Therefore, interviews occurred at a time of convenience to the participant, using telephone calls, e-mail or other web meetings. A quiet and comfortable place was chosen by each participant (home or workplace). |
| 15. | Presence of non- participants | Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? | There were other health professionals and family members. |
| 16. | Description of sample | What are the important characteristics of the sample? e.g. demographic data, date | 78.9% were women with a mean age of 30 years. 57.9% participants was working in emergency departments and the most common cities were Barcelona (47.3%), Madrid (15.8%), and Seville (36.9%). |
| Data collection | |||
| 17. | Interview guide | Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? | Yes, they were. / Yes, it was. |
| 18. | Repeat interviews | Were repeat inter views carried out? If yes, how many? | No, they weren't. |
| 19. | Audio/visual recording | Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | Audio recording. |
| 20. | Field notes | Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? | No, they weren't. |
| 21. | Duration | What was the duration of the inter views or focus group? | Average 50-60 minutes. |
| 22. | Data saturation | Was data saturation discussed? | Yes, it was. |
| 23. | Transcripts returned | Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? | Reviewed by 2 participants. |
| Doman 3: Analysis and findings | |||
| Data analysis | |||
| 24. | Number of data coders | How many data coders coded the data? | Two (LL and RDC). |
| 25. | Description of the coding tree | Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? | Yes, we did. |
| 26. | Derivation of themes | Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? | Themes were derived using both methods. |
| 27. | Software | What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? | MAXQDA |
| 28. | Participant checking | Did participants provide feedback on the findings? | Reviewed by 2 participants |
| Reporting | |||
| 29. | Quotations presented | Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? e.g. participant number | Yes, there were. / Yes, there was. |
| 30. | Data and findings consistent | Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? | Yes, there was. |
| 31. | Clarity of major themes | Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? | Yes, they were. |
| 32. | Clarity of minor themes | Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? | Yes, there is. |
Developed from: Tong, A. Sainsbury, P., and Craig, J. 2007. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32- ítem checklist for interviews and focus group. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 19: 349-357.
Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Participants
| Variables | Participants ( |
|---|---|
| Woman | 15 (78.9) |
| Man | 4 (21.1) |
| 30 (8.09) | |
| European (white) | 18 (94.7) |
| Asian | 1 (5.3) |
| 500-1,499€ | 2 (10.5) |
| 1,500-2,999€ | 13 (68.4) |
| 3,000-4,999€ | 3 (15.8) |
| ≥ 5,000€ | 1 (5.3) |
| Barcelona | 9 (47.3) |
| Madrid | 3 (15.8) |
| Seville | 7 (36.9) |
| Intensive Critical Unit (ICU) | 8 (42.1) |
| Emergency services | 11 (57.9) |
| Public | 15 (78.9) |
| Private | 1 (5.3) |
| Mixed | 3 (15.8) |
| None and I don't believe in God | 9 (47.3) |
| Catholic | 8 (42.1) |
| Buddhist | 1 (5.3) |
| Belief in energies | 1 (5.3) |
| Spiritual and Religious | 7 (36.9) |
| Spiritual, but not Religious | 1 (5.3) |
| Religious, but not Spiritual | 2 (10.5) |
| Neither Spiritual nor Religious | 9 (47.3) |
Figure 1It incorporates two photos of ICU rooms: (a) The daughter of a patient brought a handmade canvas made by the villagers. Since she couldn't be with her father, she asked the nurse to hang it up. The nurse one afternoon hung it in the place where the patient could see it and he told her about "his Virgin”; (b) A nurse found an image of the Virgin next to a patient's respirator, understanding it as a symbol of protection that the patient and her family trusted.
Figure 2A nurse and an emergency technician enter a Catholic church. They work for 12 hours, providing home care, where people affected by COVID-19 remain alone, sad and desperate. When they get a break or finish their workday, they remain silent with their thoughts and with God in this church, seeking answers and hope to overcome the pandemic.
Figure 3Graphic summary of the reults.