| Literature DB >> 34711272 |
Adriano Rodrigues de Paula1, Leila Eid Imad Silva1, Anderson Ribeiro1, Gerson Adriano da Silva1, Carlos Peres Silva2, Tariq M Butt3, Richard Ian Samuels4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) for the control of adult mosquitoes is a promising alternative to synthetic insecticides. Previous studies have only evaluated conidiospores against adult mosquitoes. However, blastospores, which are highly virulent against mosquito larvae and pupae, could also be effective against adults.Entities:
Keywords: Arbovirus; Biological control; Blastospores; Conidia; Dengue; Fungus; Pathogen
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34711272 PMCID: PMC8555014 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-05055-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1a Survival curves of Aedes aegypti females sprayed with conidia or blastospore suspensions of two Metarhizium anisopliae isolates (ESALQ 818 and LEF 2000) at a concentration of 1 × 108 propagules ml−1. b Survival curves of Ae. aegypti females sprayed with conidia or blastospore suspensions of two Metarhizium anisopliae isolates (ESALQ 818 and LEF 2000) at a concentration of 1 × 10 propagules ml−1. Control data for all treatment groups were combined and are represented as a single survival curve. Error bars are ± SD (standard deviation of the mean)
Aedes aegypti survival rates on day 3 and day 7 following different treatments
| Treatments/isolate | Day 3 | Day 7 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival (%) ± SD | Survival (%) ± SD | |||
| Blastospores ESALQ 818 | 15.5 ± 3.51a | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Conidia ESALQ 818 | 33.3 ± 5.29b | 3 | 36.6 ± 8.45 b | 4 |
| Blastospores LEF 2000 | 26.6 ± 7.81b | 3 | 16.6 ± 9.39 a | 3 |
| Conidia LEF 2000 | 45.5 ± 6.65c | 3 | 42.2 ± 6.54 c | 4 |
| Controls | 88 ± 1.52d | nd | 87.7 ± 2.14 d | ND |
Results are shown as the mean survival rates (% ± SD) after spraying mosquitoes with 1 × 108 ml−1 (conidia or blastospores) of two isolates (ESALQ 818 and LEF 2000) on day 3 or day 7 following spraying of mosquitoes with 1 × 107 ml−1 (conidia or blastospores)
The mean survival percentages followed by different letters indicate statistical differences when comparing values (columns) using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s post hoc (5% level). Control data for each treatment group were combined, and a single mean survival rate was calculated
nd not determined
Fig. 2Survival curves of Aedes aegypti females following exposure to ESALQ 818 blastospore (1 × 107 ml−1)-impregnated black cotton cloths immediately after applying the blastospore suspensions to the cloths (0 h), 12 h after preparing the cloths, and 24 h after preparing the cloths. Control data for all treatment groups were combined and represented as a single survival curve. Error bars are ± SD (standard deviation of the mean)
Aedes aegypti survival rates following exposure to blastospores at different times after applying the suspensions to the cloths
| Drying time | Blastospores 0 h | Blastospores 12 h | Blastospores 24 h | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survival (%) ± SD | 8.8 ± 9.97a | 61.1 ± 4.32b | 81.1 ± 1.61c | 82.2 ± 2.36 c |
| 3 | nd | nd | nd |
End-point survival rates (% ± SD) and median survival times (S50) of female Ae. aegypti 7 days after exposure to cloths impregnated with ESALQ 818 blastospores at a concentration of 1 × 107 propagules ml−1. The cloths were placed in the pots immediately (0 h), 12 h, or 24 h after applying blastospores to the cloths. Mean survival percentages followed by different letters indicate statistical differences when comparing values using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s post hoc (5% level). Control data for all treatment groups were combined, and a single mean survival rate was calculated
nd not determined
Fig. 3Survival curves of Aedes aegypti females following exposure to ESALQ 818 blastospore (1 × 107 ml−1)-impregnated black cotton cloths with and without the addition of 20% sunflower oil to the suspensions. Mosquitoes were exposed to the cloths immediately after application of fungi to the cloths (0 h), or 12 h later, 24 h later, or 48 h later. Control data for all treatment groups were combined and represented as a single survival curve. Error bars are ± SD (standard deviation of the mean)
Aedes aegypti survival rates following exposure to blastospores formulated in oil at different times after preparation
| Treatments | Mean survival (%) ± SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Blastospores + oil 0 h | 4 ± 9.75a | 3 |
| Blastospores + oil 12 h | 8.8 ± 10.6b | 3 |
| Blastospores + oil 24 h | 11.1 ± 8.37b | 3 |
| Blastospores + oil 48 h | 28.8 ± 7.9c | 4 |
| Control + oil | 81.1 ± 2.76d | nd |
| Control (TW) | 82.2 ± 2.28d | nd |
Survival rates (% ± SD) and median survival times (S50) of female Ae. aegypti 7 days after exposure to cloths impregnated with ESALQ 818 blastospores at a concentration of 1 × 107 propagules ml−1, with and without the addition of 20% sunflower oil to the suspensions. Mosquitoes were exposed to the cloths immediately after application of fungi to the cloths (0 h) or 12 h, 24 h, or 48 h later. Mean survival percentages followed by different letters indicate statistical differences when comparing values using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s post hoc (5% level). Control data for each oil treatment group (four data sets) were combined, and the single mean survival rate was calculated
nd not determined, TW Tween 20