| Literature DB >> 34711245 |
Tobias Schmidt1, Constantin Schmidt1, Michael Amling1, Jan Kramer2, Florian Barvencik3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) encoded by the ALPL gene is of particular importance for bone mineralization. Mutation in the ALPL gene can lead to persistent low ALP activity resulting in the rare disease Hypophosphatasia (HPP) that is characterized by disturbed bone and dental mineralization. While severe forms are extremely rare with an estimated prevalence of 1/100.000, recent studies suggest that moderate form caused by heterozygous mutations are much more frequent with an estimated prevalence of 1/508. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of low AP levels in the population based on laboratory measurements.Entities:
Keywords: Alkaline phosphatase; Hypophosphatasia; Pyridoxal-5-phosphate; Rare bone disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34711245 PMCID: PMC8555173 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-02084-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Fig. 1Clinical and histologic characteristics of Hypophosphatasia (HPP). Stress fractures and bone marrow edemas are typical musculoskeletal manifestations of HPP. a Stress fracture of the right femur diaphysis. b Stress fracture of the right second metatarsale bone. c Histological section of a bone biopsy of the os pubis in Toluidine blue staining. Mineralized bone is shown in dark blue. The arrow is showing a thick layer of non-mineralized bone (osteoid) in light blue in the sense of osteomalacia. d Typical dental changes with discoloration of teeth due to hypomineralization. e and f The reduced muscle strength can be objectified using a hand dynamometer. In the example, the patient shows a reduced hand strength (HK) on the left by 3 standard deviations (SD) below the age- and gender-specific reference values
Fig. 2Overview of typical HPP symptoms and their localization. Hypophosphatasia is a metabolic multisystemic disease with various organ systems involved. In addition to musculoskeletal symptoms such as stress fractures, joint and muscle pain, neurological symptoms and gastrointestinal complaints may also occur
Overview of different differential diagnoses for decreased ALP activity. Modified from (13)
| Causes of low ALP activity |
|---|
| Hypophosphatasia (HPP) |
| Osteogenesis imperfecta |
| Cleidocranial dysplasia |
| Mseleni joint disease |
| Vitamin D intoxication |
| Multiple myeloma |
| Wilson's disease |
| Vitamin C deficiency |
| hypothyroidism |
| Zn++ or Mg++ deficiency |
| Cushing's syndrome |
| Milk-alkali syndrome |
| Celiac disease |
| Starvation |
| Bisphosphonate therapy |
Fig. 3Prevalence of low ALP activity in the general population. Values of ALP activity in 6.918.126 subjects including 3.302.192 male and 3.615.934 female subjects. Percentage contains the first determined ALP value of each subject. All subjects are > 18 years of age
Fig. 4Prevalence of elevated PLP levels in subjects with decreased ALP activity. Values of Pyridoxal-5-phosphate in subjects with ALP activity < 30 U/L. PLP values were available in 0.59% (n = 3.447) of subjects with an ALP activity below 30 < U/L including 0.60% (n = 1.643) of male subjects and 0.58% (n = 1.804) of female subjects
Presentation of the entire data in total numbers and corresponding percentages
| Total number of ALP activity measurements | Number of ALP activity < 30 U/L | Percentage of ALP activity < 30 U/L (%) | Total number of PLP measurement in the group of ALP activity < 30 U/L | Percentage of measured PLP values in the group of ALP activity < 30 U/L (%) | Total number of elevated PLP in the group of ALP activity < 30 U/L | Percentage of elevated PLP in the group of ALP activity < 30 U/L (%) | Estimated prevalence of ALP activity < 30 U/L and elevated PLP* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | 6.918.126 | 585.287 | 8.46 | 3.447 | 0.59 | 210 | 6.09 | 0.52% (1/194) |
| Men | 3.302.192 | 275.402 | 8.34 | 1.643 | 0.60 | 110 | 6.69 | 0.56% (1/179) |
| Women | 3.615.934 | 309.885 | 8.57 | 1.804 | 0.58 | 100 | 5.54 | 0.48% (1/210) |
To calculate the estimated prevalence, the following formula was used * (number of ALP activity < 30 U/L) × (percentage of elevated PLP)/total number of ALP activity measurement