Literature DB >> 34710216

CPX-351 induces remission in newly diagnosed pediatric secondary myeloid malignancies.

Yixin Hu1, Kenneth J Caldwell2, Mihaela Onciu3, Sara M Federico2, Marta Salek2, Sara Lewis1, Shaohua Lei4, Jinghui Zhang4, Kim E Nichols2, Clifford M Takemoto1, Brandon M Triplett5, Jason E Farrar6, Jeffrey E Rubnitz2, Raul C Ribeiro2, Marcin W Wlodarski1.   

Abstract

Secondary myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia (sMDS/AML) are rare in children and adolescents and have a dismal prognosis. The mainstay therapy is hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but there has been no innovation in cytoreductive regimens. CP X-351, a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of liposomal cytarabine to daunorubicin, has shown favorable safety and efficacy in elderly individuals with secondary AML and children with relapsed de novo AML. We report the outcomes of 7 young patients (6 with newly diagnosed sMDS/AML and 1 with primary MDS/AML) uniformly treated with CP X-351. Five patients had previously received chemotherapy for osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, neuroblastoma, or T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; 1 had predisposing genomic instability disorder (Cornelia de Lange syndrome) and 1 had MDS-related AML and multiorgan failure. The median age at diagnosis of myeloid malignancy was 17 years (range, 13-23 years). Patients received 1 to 3 cycles of CP X-351 (cytarabine 100 mg/m2 plus daunorubicin 44 mg/m2) on days 1, 3, and 5, resulting in complete morphologic remission without overt toxicity or treatment-related mortality. This approach allowed for adding an FLT3 inhibitor as individualized therapy in 1 patient. Six patients were alive and leukemia-free at 0.5 to 3.3 years after HCT. One patient died as a result of disease progression before HCT. To summarize, CP X-351 is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for cytoreduction in pediatric sMDS/AML that warrants prospective studies.
© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34710216      PMCID: PMC8791570          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


Introduction

Secondary myeloid malignancies in children and adolescents are clinically and biologically related disorders associated with previous oncologic therapies or with antecedent hematologic disorders, including inherited bone marrow (BM) failure syndromes.[1-3] The disease continuum runs from secondary myelodysplastic syndromes (sMDS) to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) as defined by diagnostic blast count. Patients with sMDS/AML have inferior outcomes when compared with primary MDS/AML, and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative option.[4-6] However, treatment-related mortality is a major concern in this vulnerable patient population.[3] Pediatric therapy-related sMDS has poor outcomes, and chemotherapy alone does not cure the disease; in a historical study, the estimated overall survival (OS) of 41 children with treatment-related sMDS was about 40%.[7] Despite advances in HCT, outcomes remain poor, as exemplified by a recent analysis showing 5-year OS of ∼44%.[8] Intensive AML chemotherapy before HCT in children with MDS-related AML is associated with reduced relapse rates but an event-free survival (EFS) of only 47%.[9] Recently, CPX-351 (Vyxeos), a liposomal combination of cytarabine and daunomycin at a fixed 5:1 ratio, has shown promise for treating adult sAML.[10-12] The accumulation and cytotoxic effects of CPX-351 are greater in leukemic blasts than in normal BM cells, thus preferentially suppressing leukemic expansion while permitting rapid repopulation by normal hematopoiesis.[13,14] In newly diagnosed sAML in older adults, CPX-351 induces higher rates of complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), significantly improves OS and EFS, increases HCT enrollment, and reduces mortality compared with standard 7 + 3 regimens.[15,16] The safety and efficacy of CPX-351 were recently demonstrated in relapsed pediatric de novo AML,[17] but there are no data in pediatric sMDS/AML. Here, we report for the first time the application of CPX-351 for remission induction in newly diagnosed pediatric sMDS/AML.

Methods

Details regarding the patients, diagnostics, and treatment are outlined in the data Supplement. Response criteria in our study were adopted from the 2017 European LeukemiaNet recommendations.[18] CR was defined as complete morphologic response (<5% BM blasts, no blasts with Auer rods, no extramedullary leukemia) with hematologic recovery (transfusion-free status with absolute neutrophil count >1.0 × 109/L and platelet count >100.0 × 109/L). CRi was defined as a complete morphologic response not reaching full hematologic recovery. Partial response was defined as a minimum 50% decrease (to 5% to 25%) in the BM blast percentage, whereas no response was considered to have occurred when the BM blast counts remained above 25%.

Results and discussion

The study cohort comprised 5 male patients and 2 female patients in whom myeloid malignancy was diagnosed at a median age of 17 years (range, 13-23 years) after therapy for primary solid or hematologic tumors (patient 1 to patient 5 [P1-P5]), arising from MDS related to Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CDL; P6), or presenting with AML with MDS-related changes, multiple organ failure, and multisystemic hyperinflammation (P7) (Table 1). The time from diagnosis of primary malignancy to development of sAML in P1 to P5 ranged from 2.8 years to 15 years (Figure 1A). The median BM blast count in all patients at diagnosis was 56% (range, 24%-72%) (Figure 1B), and the absolute neutrophil count ranged from 0.4 × 109/L to 23.7 × 109/L (supplemental Table 1).
Table 1.

Clinical characteristics, therapy, and outcome

CharacteristicPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Patient 5Patient 6Patient 7
SexMaleMaleMaleMaleFemaleMaleFemale
Previous diagnosis at ageLocalized osteosarcoma,10 y 9 moLocalized osteosarcoma,13 y 11 moLocalized stage VEwing sarcoma,18 y 8 moStage IV, high-risk neuroblastoma,1 y 9 moT-ALL,14 y 1 moMDS-EB with underlying CDL syndrome,17 y 2 moNone
Myeloid malignancyAMLAMLAMLAMLAMLMDS/AMLAML with MDS-related changes
Blast count in BM, %60475671572432
Age at diagnosis13 y 6 mo19 y 1 mo23 y 10 mo16 y 9 mo18 y 8 mo17 y 4 mo13 y 3 mo
CytogeneticsDel5q, del7q, add3q, t(2;3)(p21;q26.2)Del11p, t(5;5)(p12;p15.33),inv3(p24.3;q26.2)Multiple gains and lossesComplexMonosomy 7NormalComplex with monosomy 7
Somatic mutationsKRAS, IKZF1, NF1, CSNK1A1 deletion WT1 TP53, NF1, PDGFRA; deletions: ETV6, CSNK1A1;amplifications: KMT2A, ATMRUNX1, NF1NPM1, CEBPA, NRAS, FLT3-ITDDeletions: TP53, RUNX1, ZBTB7A
Treatment
 CPX-3512 cycles3 cycles2 cycles1 cycle2 cycles1 cycle1 cycle
 Venetoclax1 cycle
 Venetoclax and cytarabine1 cycle
 Venetoclax and decitabine1 cycle
 Decitabine1 cycle1 cycle (pre-CPX351)1 cycle
 AzacytidineOnce per month after HCT
 FLAG1 cycle
 GilteritinibBefore and after HCT
 Allogeneic HCTHaplo-father (first),haplo-mother (second)Haplo-brotherHaplo-sisterHaplo-uncleMUDHaplo-grandmother
No. of surgeries2
Status at last follow-upAlive, 18.5 mo after HCTAlive, 39.1 mo after HCTDeceased 4 mo after diagnosis (disease progress and infection)Alive, 6.2 mo after HCTAlive, 34.1 mo after HCTAlive, 6.3 mo after HCTAlive, 7.5 mo after HCT

Details on cytogenetics and molecular findings are provided in supplemental Table 2. Details on marrow response are depicted in Figure 2.

FLAG, fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regimen; haplo, haploidentical; MDS-EB, MDS with excess blasts; MUD, matched unrelated donor; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Figure 1.

Treatment procedures and response in patients treated with CPX-351. (A) Timeline of treatment procedures. (B) Range and median reduction in BM cellularity and blasts after treatment with CPX-351. (C) BM biopsy findings for Patient 7 at diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes and hyperinflammation (panels i-iii) and 1 month after a single cycle of CPX-351 (panel iv). (i) Hypercellular marrow with sheets of dysplastic megakaryocytes (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain; original magnification ×200). (ii) Increased immature mononuclear cells, normal hematopoiesis absent (H&E stain; original magnification ×600). (iii) Reticulin fibrosis (reticulin stain; original magnification ×400). (iv) Hypocellular marrow with no dysplastic cells or fibrosis (H&E stain; original magnification ×600). FLAG, fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regimen; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Clinical characteristics, therapy, and outcome Details on cytogenetics and molecular findings are provided in supplemental Table 2. Details on marrow response are depicted in Figure 2.
Figure 2.

BM findings in individual patients during therapy. Dx, diagnosis; Haplo, haploidentical donor; m, months; MUD, matched unrelated donor; MRD, minimal residual disease.

FLAG, fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regimen; haplo, haploidentical; MDS-EB, MDS with excess blasts; MUD, matched unrelated donor; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Treatment procedures and response in patients treated with CPX-351. (A) Timeline of treatment procedures. (B) Range and median reduction in BM cellularity and blasts after treatment with CPX-351. (C) BM biopsy findings for Patient 7 at diagnosis of AML with MDS-related changes and hyperinflammation (panels i-iii) and 1 month after a single cycle of CPX-351 (panel iv). (i) Hypercellular marrow with sheets of dysplastic megakaryocytes (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E] stain; original magnification ×200). (ii) Increased immature mononuclear cells, normal hematopoiesis absent (H&E stain; original magnification ×600). (iii) Reticulin fibrosis (reticulin stain; original magnification ×400). (iv) Hypocellular marrow with no dysplastic cells or fibrosis (H&E stain; original magnification ×600). FLAG, fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor regimen; T-ALL, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genomic studies identified pathogenic germline mutations in CHEK2 (P4) and SMC3 (P6) and additional heterozygous variants of uncertain significance in HLTF (P3) and FANCD2 (P1) (supplemental Table 2). A germline-truncating SMC3 mutation in P6 was compatible with the clinical phenotype of CDL syndrome, a genome instability disorder called cohesinopathy (SMC3 mutations account for 1% to 2% of patients with CDL syndrome).[19] Two patients with CDL-associated acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and AML have been previously reported,[20,21] but the CDL-MDS association presented here is new. CHEK2 mutations are implicated in familial breast cancer[22] and MDS.[23] Using 3-platform genomics[24] and cytogenetics (data Supplement), we identified somatic mutations and copy-number changes across 16 leukemia driver genes in 6 patients (including TP53 in 2 patients), abnormal karyotypes in 6 patients, and rearrangements involving MECOM or NIM1K-TERT in 2 patients (supplemental Table 2). CPX-351 (cytarabine 100 mg/m2 plus daunorubicin 44 mg/m2) on days 1, 3, and 5 of each cycle was administered to 6 patients as first-line therapy and to 1 patient after 2 unsuccessful 10-day courses of decitabine (Figure 1A). Three patients received either 1 or 2 cycles of CPX-351, and 1 patient received 3 cycles. After the first cycle, all patients experienced a reduction in BM cellularity from a median of 90% at diagnosis to 5% at 4 to 6 weeks after therapy; BM blasts decreased from a median of 56% to 2% (Figure 1B-C). The second cycle of treatment resulted in a reduction of BM blasts to a median of 0.5%. Marrow response was attained in 5 patients after only 1 cycle and in 2 patients after 2 treatment cycles (Figure 2). In summary, all patients attained either CR (after 1 cycle in P4 and 2 cycles in P2 and P5) or CRi (after 1 cycle in P6 and P7 and 2 cycles in P1 and P3). Two patients with initial CRi attained CR while receiving therapy with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib (P6) or with venetoclax and decitabine (P7) (Figure 1A). Four patients (P4-P7) underwent HCT in CR, with a mean minimal residual disease (MRD) of 0.11% (range, 0%-0.29%). Two patients (P1 and P2) underwent HCT with hypoplastic marrows and MRD levels greater than 1.0% (supplemental Table 1). The remaining patient (P3) experienced AML progression while awaiting HCT and died of infection after treatment with intensive regimen with fludarabine, cytarabine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (FLAG) chemotherapy. P1 had increasing marrow blasts 12 months after the first HCT and received a successful second haploidentical HCT from his mother (Figure 2). At last follow-up, 6 patients were alive at a median of 12.5 months (range, 6-39 months) after HCT. Overall, the patients tolerated CPX-351 treatment well; there was no treatment-related mortality, and common complications included febrile neutropenia, oral mucositis, and skin rash (supplemental Table 3). BM findings in individual patients during therapy. Dx, diagnosis; Haplo, haploidentical donor; m, months; MUD, matched unrelated donor; MRD, minimal residual disease. We encountered unique management challenges in our cohort. P2 presented with bilateral lung osteosarcoma relapse at the time of sAML diagnosis. After he recovered from the first course of CPX-351, the left lung lesions were resected. After hematologic recovery from a second course of CPX-351, he underwent resection of the right lung metastases. This latter surgical procedure was complicated by a wound infection that delayed HCT and by the resurgence of AML. Accordingly, another course of CPX-351 was administered before the patient underwent HCT. P7 presented with severe multisystem inflammation associated with severe cardiac, pulmonary, and renal failure. To our surprise, she tolerated CPX-351 very well and received decitabine and venetoclax for consolidation to bridge to HCT. P6, with CDL syndrome and FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)–positive sAML, had excellent response to CPX-351 and afterward received gilteritinib for bridging to HCT and after HCT (day +100). Limitations of our study are its retrospective nature and lack of a comparison cohort, limited cohort size, and a short follow-up after HCT. Nonetheless, this case series is representative of pediatric sMDS/AML and includes patients with somatic TP53 mutations, complex karyotypes, hyperinflammation, and inherited genomic instability, all of which are known factors for poor prognosis. The combination of cytarabine with daunomycin is the mainstay of treatment in AML, and CPX-351 represents an optimized strategy to deliver this combination, which results in excellent cytoreductive efficacy and in bringing all patients to CR/CRi after only 1 or 2 cycles. Most importantly, we observed low toxicity despite extensive pretreatments or poor clinical condition. This opens a window of opportunity for targeted bridge-to-transplant approaches (such as the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib in our cohort), particularly useful in patients for whom HCT is not readily available. Secondary myeloid malignancies in young individuals are orphan diseases that lack therapeutic innovation and unified treatment. The promising data from our study supports the need for prospective multicenter trials to define the long-term benefit of CPX-351 in pediatric secondary myeloid malignancies.

Supplementary Material

The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement. Click here for additional data file.
  22 in total

1.  Erratum to: Cytogenetics and clinical features of pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome in Japan.

Authors:  Koichi Moriwaki; Atsushi Manabe; Takeshi Taketani; Akira Kikuchi; Tatsutoshi Nakahata; Yasuhide Hayashi
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  How to address second and therapy-related acute myelogenous leukaemia.

Authors:  Caspian Oliai; Gary Schiller
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome in children: results of the EWOG-MDS 98 study.

Authors:  B Strahm; P Nöllke; M Zecca; E T Korthof; M Bierings; I Furlan; P Sedlacek; A Chybicka; M Schmugge; V Bordon; C Peters; A O'Marcaigh; C D de Heredia; E Bergstraesser; B D Moerloose; M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; J Starý; M Trebo; D Wojcik; C M Niemeyer; F Locatelli
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Leukemia-selective uptake and cytotoxicity of CPX-351, a synergistic fixed-ratio cytarabine:daunorubicin formulation, in bone marrow xenografts.

Authors:  Wah-Seng Lim; Paul G Tardi; Nancy Dos Santos; Xiaowei Xie; Mannie Fan; Barry D Liboiron; Xiaoping Huang; Troy O Harasym; David Bermudes; Lawrence D Mayer
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Identification of deleterious germline CHEK2 mutations and their association with breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Petra Kleiblova; Lenka Stolarova; Katerina Krizova; Filip Lhota; Jan Hojny; Petra Zemankova; Ondrej Havranek; Michal Vocka; Marta Cerna; Klara Lhotova; Marianna Borecka; Marketa Janatova; Jana Soukupova; Jan Sevcik; Martina Zimovjanova; Jaroslav Kotlas; Ales Panczak; Kamila Vesela; Jana Cervenkova; Michaela Schneiderova; Monika Burocziova; Kamila Burdova; Viktor Stranecky; Lenka Foretova; Eva Machackova; Spiros Tavandzis; Stanislav Kmoch; Libor Macurek; Zdenek Kleibl
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Role of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes in childhood. The European Working Group on Childhood Myelodysplastic Syndrome (EWOG-MDS) and the Austria-Germany-Italy (AGI) Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry.

Authors:  F Locatelli; M Zecca; C Niemeyer; E Angelucci; G Arcese; C Bender-Gotze; F Bonetti; S Burdach; G Dini; W Ebell; W Friedrich; H Hasle; J Hermann; N Jacobsen; T Klingebiel; B Kremens; G Mann; R Miniero; A Pession; C Peters; P Paolucci; F Rossetti; H J Schmid; J Stary; M Zimmermann
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 8.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Epidemiology and Clinical Significance of Secondary and Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A National Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lene Sofie Granfeldt Østgård; Bruno C Medeiros; Henrik Sengeløv; Mette Nørgaard; Mette Klarskov Andersen; Inge Høgh Dufva; Lone Smidstrup Friis; Eigil Kjeldsen; Claus Werenberg Marcher; Birgitte Preiss; Marianne Severinsen; Jan Maxwell Nørgaard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  CPX-351: a nanoscale liposomal co-formulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine with unique biodistribution and tumor cell uptake properties.

Authors:  Lawrence D Mayer; Paul Tardi; Arthur C Louie
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-05-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  Potential role of STAG1 mutations in genetic predisposition to childhood hematological malignancies.

Authors:  Grazia Fazio; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Claudia Saitta; Stefano Rebellato; Laura Rachele Bettini; Giovanni Giudici; Nicolò Panini; Eugenio Erba; Valentina Massa; Franziska Auer; Ulrike Friedrich; Julia Hauer; Andrea Biondi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 9.812

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.