Reagan E Fitzke1,2, Dylan R Marsh1, Mark A Prince1. 1. Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Park and Folkman's (1997) meaning-making model posits that distress from traumatic events stems from discrepancies between one's global meaning framework and appraised situational meaning of the traumatic event, with meaning making diminishing these discrepancies and thus bolstering well-being. The current study investigates this supposition over a 19-year span in mid-life adults. METHODS: We selected participants from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study who had indicated the experience of a negatively impactful traumatic event (N = 1687). We hypothesized that increased positive reappraisal (a type of meaning making) would have an indirect effect on positive and negative affect through the three dimensions of meaning in life (significance, coherence, and purpose). RESULTS: All direct and indirect effects were significant and supported hypotheses. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the assertions of the meaning-making model hold true over a period of nearly two decades among mid-life adults who have experienced traumatic events.
INTRODUCTION: Park and Folkman's (1997) meaning-making model posits that distress from traumatic events stems from discrepancies between one's global meaning framework and appraised situational meaning of the traumatic event, with meaning making diminishing these discrepancies and thus bolstering well-being. The current study investigates this supposition over a 19-year span in mid-life adults. METHODS: We selected participants from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) study who had indicated the experience of a negatively impactful traumatic event (N = 1687). We hypothesized that increased positive reappraisal (a type of meaning making) would have an indirect effect on positive and negative affect through the three dimensions of meaning in life (significance, coherence, and purpose). RESULTS: All direct and indirect effects were significant and supported hypotheses. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the assertions of the meaning-making model hold true over a period of nearly two decades among mid-life adults who have experienced traumatic events.