Antje Fischer-Rosinský1, Anna Slagman2, Ryan King3, Grit Zimmermann4, Johannes Drepper4, Dominik Brammen5, Christian Lüpkes6, Thomas Reinhold3, Stephanie Roll3, Thomas Keil3,7,8, Martin Möckel2, Felix Greiner9. 1. Notfall- und Akutmedizin (Campus Mitte und Virchow-Klinikum), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. antje.fischer-rosinsky@charite.de. 2. Notfall- und Akutmedizin (Campus Mitte und Virchow-Klinikum), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. 3. Institut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland. 4. TMF - Technologie- und Methodenplattform für vernetzte medizinische Forschung e. V., Berlin, Deutschland. 5. Universitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland. 6. OFFIS - Institut für Informatik, Oldenburg, Deutschland. 7. Institut für klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie, Universität von Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland. 8. Landesinstitut für Gesundheit, Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Bad Kissingen, Deutschland. 9. Universitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Germany there is currently no health reporting on cross-sectoral care patterns in the context of an emergency department care treatment. The INDEED project (Utilization and trans-sectoral patterns of care for patients admitted to emergency departments in Germany) collects routine data from 16 emergency departments, which are later merged with outpatient billing data from 2014 to 2017 on an individual level. AIM: The methodological challenges in planning of the internal merging of routine clinical and administrative data from emergency departments in Germany up to the final data extraction are presented together with possible solution approaches. METHODS: Data were selected in an iterative process according to the research questions, medical relevance, and assumed data availability. After a preparatory phase to clarify formalities (including data protection, ethics), review test data and correct if necessary, the encrypted and pseudonymous data extraction was performed. RESULTS: Data from the 16 cooperating emergency departments came mostly from the emergency department and hospital information systems. There was considerable heterogeneity in the data. Not all variables were available in every emergency department because, for example, they were not standardized and digitally available or the extraction effort was judged to be too high. CONCLUSION: Relevant data from emergency departments are stored in different structures and in several IT systems. Thus, the creation of a harmonized data set requires considerable resources on the part of the hospital as well as the data processing unit. This needs to be generously calculated for future projects.
BACKGROUND: In Germany there is currently no health reporting on cross-sectoral care patterns in the context of an emergency department care treatment. The INDEED project (Utilization and trans-sectoral patterns of care for patients admitted to emergency departments in Germany) collects routine data from 16 emergency departments, which are later merged with outpatient billing data from 2014 to 2017 on an individual level. AIM: The methodological challenges in planning of the internal merging of routine clinical and administrative data from emergency departments in Germany up to the final data extraction are presented together with possible solution approaches. METHODS: Data were selected in an iterative process according to the research questions, medical relevance, and assumed data availability. After a preparatory phase to clarify formalities (including data protection, ethics), review test data and correct if necessary, the encrypted and pseudonymous data extraction was performed. RESULTS: Data from the 16 cooperating emergency departments came mostly from the emergency department and hospital information systems. There was considerable heterogeneity in the data. Not all variables were available in every emergency department because, for example, they were not standardized and digitally available or the extraction effort was judged to be too high. CONCLUSION: Relevant data from emergency departments are stored in different structures and in several IT systems. Thus, the creation of a harmonized data set requires considerable resources on the part of the hospital as well as the data processing unit. This needs to be generously calculated for future projects.
Authors: D Brammen; F Greiner; M Kulla; R Otto; W Schirrmeister; S Thun; S E Drösler; J Pollmanns; S C Semler; R Lefering; V S Thiemann; R W Majeed; K U Heitmann; R Röhrig; F Walcher Journal: Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 0.840
Authors: Antje Fischer-Rosinský; Anna Slagman; Ryan King; Thomas Reinhold; Liane Schenk; Felix Greiner; Dominik von Stillfried; Grit Zimmermann; Christian Lüpkes; Christian Günster; Natalie Baier; Cornelia Henschke; Stephanie Roll; Thomas Keil; Martin Möckel Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-04-16