E Villedieu1, M C Nolff2, S Del Magno3, T Emmerson4, E Field5, R Hattersley6, B De La Puerta4, R A Ragni7, S J Baines1. 1. Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Solihull, B90 4NH, UK. 2. FTA Kleintiermedizin, FTA Kleintierchirurgie, Leitung Weichteil und Onkologische Chirurgie, Tierspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. 3. Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Alma Mater Studorium, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. 4. North Downs Specialist Referrals, Bletchingley, RH1 4QP, UK. 5. Highcroft Veterinary Referrals, Bristol, BS14 9BE, UK. 6. Dick White Referrals, Cambridgeshire, CB8 0UH, UK. 7. Village Vet West Hampstead, London, NW6 1LN, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To report the complication rate, type of complications and outcome of the superficial brachial axial pattern flap when used for closure of skin defects in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of dogs treated with a superficial brachial axial pattern flap for closure of a skin defect were reviewed. Information regarding signalment, reason for axial pattern flap use, skin flap size, flap healing, postoperative complications and need for revision surgery was collected. RESULTS: Sixteen dogs were included in the study. Indications for the superficial brachial axial pattern flap included closure following tumour removal (15/16, 94%) and management of a non-healing wound on the olecranon (1/16, 6%). Postoperative complications occurred in all dogs and included partial dehiscence (7/16, 44%), partial flap necrosis (6/16. 38%), seroma formation (5/16, 31%), flap oedema (3/16, 19%) and complete flap necrosis (2/16, 13%). Eight flaps (50%) healed without open wound management or additional surgery. Five dogs required open wound management without additional surgery, and three dogs (19%) required revision surgery. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Use of the superficial brachial axial pattern flap was associated with a high rate of complications. Most complications were managed without additional surgery and all wounds eventually healed, in some cases after prolonged open wound management.
OBJECTIVES: To report the complication rate, type of complications and outcome of the superficial brachial axial pattern flap when used for closure of skin defects in dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of dogs treated with a superficial brachial axial pattern flap for closure of a skin defect were reviewed. Information regarding signalment, reason for axial pattern flap use, skin flap size, flap healing, postoperative complications and need for revision surgery was collected. RESULTS: Sixteen dogs were included in the study. Indications for the superficial brachial axial pattern flap included closure following tumour removal (15/16, 94%) and management of a non-healing wound on the olecranon (1/16, 6%). Postoperative complications occurred in all dogs and included partial dehiscence (7/16, 44%), partial flap necrosis (6/16. 38%), seroma formation (5/16, 31%), flap oedema (3/16, 19%) and complete flap necrosis (2/16, 13%). Eight flaps (50%) healed without open wound management or additional surgery. Five dogs required open wound management without additional surgery, and three dogs (19%) required revision surgery. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Use of the superficial brachial axial pattern flap was associated with a high rate of complications. Most complications were managed without additional surgery and all wounds eventually healed, in some cases after prolonged open wound management.