Shuhan Huang1, Chengchun Liu1, Xiaoshu Li1, Ya Wu1, Chunrong Liang1, Wei Li1, Meng Zhang2. 1. Department of Neurology, Army Medical Center of PLA, Army Medical University, 400042, Chongqing, China. 2. Department of Neurology, Army Medical Center of PLA, Army Medical University, 400042, Chongqing, China. zhangmeng@tmmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the artery diameter ratio (ADR) after recanalization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion confirmed by DSA from 1 January 2018, to 31 December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients confirmed TICI grade 2b or 3. The ADR was calculated as M2 segment diameter/M1 segment diameter. Multivariate regression analysis was used to describe clinical outcomes of two groups (ADR < 0.6 and ≥ 0.6). ROC curves were used to compare different models and find the best cutoff. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were included in the study, including 77 males and 66 females, with an average age of 67.79 ± 12 years. The NIHSS at discharge was significantly higher in the ADR < 0.6 group than another group (mean, 16.37 vs. 6.19, P < 0.001). At 90 days, the cases of functional independence was significantly less in the ADR < 0.6 group (20.97% vs. 83.95%, OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.12, P < 0.001). The ADR < 0.6 group had a higher incidence of cerebral edema (P = 0.027) and sICH (P = 0.038). The ADR had the strongest power to distinguish mRS > 2 (AUC = 0.851) and DC (AUC = 0.805), and the best cutoff value are 0.6 (specificity 85.19%, sensitivity 75.81%) and 0.58 (specificity 65.96%, sensitivity 100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The low ADR is associated with poor outcomes. The decrease in ADR may be an indirect manifestation of the loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the artery diameter ratio (ADR) after recanalization and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion confirmed by DSA from 1 January 2018, to 31 December 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients confirmed TICI grade 2b or 3. The ADR was calculated as M2 segment diameter/M1 segment diameter. Multivariate regression analysis was used to describe clinical outcomes of two groups (ADR < 0.6 and ≥ 0.6). ROC curves were used to compare different models and find the best cutoff. RESULTS: A total of 143 patients were included in the study, including 77 males and 66 females, with an average age of 67.79 ± 12 years. The NIHSS at discharge was significantly higher in the ADR < 0.6 group than another group (mean, 16.37 vs. 6.19, P < 0.001). At 90 days, the cases of functional independence was significantly less in the ADR < 0.6 group (20.97% vs. 83.95%, OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.12, P < 0.001). The ADR < 0.6 group had a higher incidence of cerebral edema (P = 0.027) and sICH (P = 0.038). The ADR had the strongest power to distinguish mRS > 2 (AUC = 0.851) and DC (AUC = 0.805), and the best cutoff value are 0.6 (specificity 85.19%, sensitivity 75.81%) and 0.58 (specificity 65.96%, sensitivity 100%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The low ADR is associated with poor outcomes. The decrease in ADR may be an indirect manifestation of the loss of cerebrovascular autoregulation.
Authors: Necmettin Tanriover; Masatou Kawashima; Albert L Rhoton; Arthur J Ulm; Robert A Mericle Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.115