Literature DB >> 34708220

Normal parents: Trans pregnancy and the production of reproducers.

Elizabeth Dietz1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some trans people want to create families in a variety of ways that include pregnancy, but often face obstacles in doing so. AIMS: This paper explores how trans pregnancy is treated as exceptional and out of the ordinary by reproductive institutions.
METHODS: Analysis of case studies demonstrates the ubiquity of institutional obstacles to trans pregnancy and how reproductive institutions unnecessarily render trans pregnancy exceptional.
RESULTS: Reproductive institutions shape the kinds of people for whom achieving pregnancy is made easier, and often fail to imagine the possibility of trans parents. This failure of imagination is not rooted in biological fact, but rather in social logics that ought to be the site for transformations that expand access and shift provider attitudes. DISCUSSION: Trans parents are unexceptional in the sense that, even though they may experience relatively more concentrated forms of adversity, they share many reproductive capabilities and obstacles with cis parents. In light of that concentrated adversity and the epistemic insights it might generate, how might prospective trans parents engage with new reproductive technologies? How might these engagements render them moral pioneers called to make decisions about the sorts of people created using reproductive biotechnologies?
© 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics; reproductive technologies; trans pregnancy; transgender

Year:  2021        PMID: 34708220      PMCID: PMC8040689          DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1834483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Transgend Health        ISSN: 2689-5269


  12 in total

1.  Access to fertility services by transgender persons: an Ethics Committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  The medicalization of birth and midwifery as resistance.

Authors:  Jessica C A Shaw
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2013-03-20

3.  Intersecting Experiences of Healthcare Denials Among Transgender and Nonbinary Patients.

Authors:  Shanna K Kattari; Matthew Bakko; Hillary K Hecht; M Killian Kinney
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Uncertain Expertise and the Limitations of Clinical Guidelines in Transgender Healthcare.

Authors:  Stef M Shuster
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2016-09

5.  Endocrine Treatment of Gender-Dysphoric/Gender-Incongruent Persons: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Wylie C Hembree; Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis; Louis Gooren; Sabine E Hannema; Walter J Meyer; M Hassan Murad; Stephen M Rosenthal; Joshua D Safer; Vin Tangpricha; Guy G T'Sjoen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Reproductive Rights without Resources or Recourse.

Authors:  Kimberly Mutcherson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Prevalence of Pregnancy Involvement Among Canadian Transgender Youth and its Relation to Mental Health, Sexual Health, and Gender Identity.

Authors:  Jaimie Veale; Ryan J Watson; Jones Adjei; Elizabeth Saewyc
Journal:  Int J Transgend       Date:  2016-08-26

8.  Imperatives of Governance: Human Genome Editing and the Problem of Progress.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hurlbut
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.416

9.  Ethical Considerations in Fertility Preservation for Transgender Youth: A Case Illustration.

Authors:  Diane Chen; Lisa Simons
Journal:  Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2018-03

10.  From erasure to opportunity: a qualitative study of the experiences of transgender men around pregnancy and recommendations for providers.

Authors:  Alexis Hoffkling; Juno Obedin-Maliver; Jae Sevelius
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.