Literature DB >> 34708145

Contrast-enhanced proton radiographic sensitivity limits for tumor detection.

Rachel B Sidebottom1, Jason C Allison1, Ethan F Aulwes1, Brittany A Broder1, Matthew S Freeman1, Per E Magnelind1, Fesseha G Mariam1, Frank E Merrill1, Levi P Neukirch1, Tamsen Schurman1, James Sinnis1, Zhaowen Tang1, Dale Tupa1, Joshua L Tybo1, Carl H Wilde1, Michelle Espy1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Proton radiography may guide proton therapy cancer treatments with beam's-eye-view anatomical images and a proton-based estimation of proton stopping power. However, without contrast enhancement, proton radiography will not be able to distinguish tumor from tissue. To provide this contrast, functionalized, high- Z nanoparticles that specifically target a tumor could be injected into a patient before imaging. We conducted this study to understand the ability of gold, as a high- Z , biologically compatible tracer, to differentiate tumors from surrounding tissue. Approach: Acrylic and gold phantoms simulate a tumor tagged with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Calculations correlate a given thickness of gold to levels of tumor AuNP uptake reported in the literature. An identity, × 3 , and × 7 proton magnifying lens acquired lens-refocused proton radiographs at the 800-MeV LANSCE proton beam. The effects of gold in the phantoms, in terms of percent density change, were observed as changes in measured transmission. Variable areal densities of acrylic modeled the thickness of the human body.
Results: A 1 - μ m -thick gold strip was discernible within 1 cm of acrylic, an areal density change of 0.2%. Behind 20 cm of acrylic, a 40 - μ m gold strip was visible. A 1-cm-diameter tumor tagged with 1 × 10 5 50-nm AuNPs per cell has an amount of contrast agent embedded within it that is equivalent to a 65 - μ m thickness of gold, an areal density change of 0.63% in a tissue thickness of 20 cm, which is expected to be visible in a typical proton radiograph. Conclusions: We indicate that AuNP-enhanced proton radiography might be a feasible technology to provide image-guidance to proton therapy, potentially reducing off-target effects and sparing nearby tissue. These data can be used to develop treatment plans and clinical applications can be derived from the simulations.
© 2021 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; gold nanoparticles; proton radiography; proton therapy; tumor assessment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34708145      PMCID: PMC8541741          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.053501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  34 in total

1.  Magnifying lens for 800 MeV proton radiography.

Authors:  F E Merrill; E Campos; C Espinoza; G Hogan; B Hollander; J Lopez; F G Mariam; D Morley; C L Morris; M Murray; A Saunders; C Schwartz; T N Thompson
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.523

Review 2.  Gold nanoparticles for applications in cancer radiotherapy: Mechanisms and recent advancements.

Authors:  Sohyoung Her; David A Jaffray; Christine Allen
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  L Leksell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry.

Authors:  Afarine Madani; Jacqueline Zanen; Viviane de Maertelaer; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Proton therapy - Present and future.

Authors:  Radhe Mohan; David Grosshans
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Histogenetic concepts, terminology and categorization of biphasic tumours of the oral and maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Arvind Babu R S; Ramana Reddy B V; Anuradha C H
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

7.  Targeted gold nanoparticles enhance sensitization of prostate tumors to megavoltage radiation therapy in vivo.

Authors:  Tatiana Wolfe; Dev Chatterjee; Jihyoun Lee; Jonathan D Grant; Shanta Bhattarai; Ramesh Tailor; Glenn Goodrich; Patricia Nicolucci; Sunil Krishnan
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 5.307

8.  Scattering proton CT.

Authors:  N Krah; C T Quiñones; J M Létang; S Rit
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Detection of breast cancer cells using targeted magnetic nanoparticles and ultra-sensitive magnetic field sensors.

Authors:  Helen J Hathaway; Kimberly S Butler; Natalie L Adolphi; Debbie M Lovato; Robert Belfon; Danielle Fegan; Todd C Monson; Jason E Trujillo; Trace E Tessier; Howard C Bryant; Dale L Huber; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Morphological differences between circulating tumor cells from prostate cancer patients and cultured prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Sunyoung Park; Richard R Ang; Simon P Duffy; Jenny Bazov; Kim N Chi; Peter C Black; Hongshen Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.