STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, quasi-experimental difference-in-differences investigation. OBJECTIVE: Pediatric craniofacial fractures are often associated with substantial morbidity and consumption of healthcare resources. Maryland's All Payer Model (APM) represents a unique case study of the health economics surrounding pediatric craniofacial fractures. The APM implemented global hospital budgets to disincentivize low-value care and encourage preventive, community-based efforts. The objective of this study was to investigate how this reform has impacted pediatric craniofacial fracture care in Maryland. METHODS: Children (≤18 years) receiving inpatient craniofacial fracture-related care in Maryland between January, 2009 through December, 2016 were investigated. New Jersey was used for comparison. Data were abstracted from the Kid's Inpatient Database (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project). RESULTS: Between 2009-2016, 3,655 pediatric patients received inpatient care for craniofacial fractures in Maryland and New Jersey. Prior to APM implementation, around 20% of Maryland patients received care outside of urban teaching hospitals. After APM implementation, less than 6% of patients received care outside of urban teaching hospitals (p = 0.003). Implementation of the APM in Maryland also resulted in fewer pediatric craniofacial fracture admissions than New Jersey, though this only reached borderline significance (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate: -1.1 fewer admissions, 95% confidence interval: -2.1 to 0.0, p = 0.05). Inpatient costs for pediatric craniofacial care and mean did not change post-APM. CONCLUSIONS: Maryland's APM consolidated pediatric craniofacial fracture inpatient care at urban, teaching hospitals. Inpatient costs and lengths of stay did not change after policy implementation, but overall admission rates decreased. Such considerations are important when considering national expansion of global hospital budgeting.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, quasi-experimental difference-in-differences investigation. OBJECTIVE: Pediatric craniofacial fractures are often associated with substantial morbidity and consumption of healthcare resources. Maryland's All Payer Model (APM) represents a unique case study of the health economics surrounding pediatric craniofacial fractures. The APM implemented global hospital budgets to disincentivize low-value care and encourage preventive, community-based efforts. The objective of this study was to investigate how this reform has impacted pediatric craniofacial fracture care in Maryland. METHODS: Children (≤18 years) receiving inpatient craniofacial fracture-related care in Maryland between January, 2009 through December, 2016 were investigated. New Jersey was used for comparison. Data were abstracted from the Kid's Inpatient Database (Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project). RESULTS: Between 2009-2016, 3,655 pediatric patients received inpatient care for craniofacial fractures in Maryland and New Jersey. Prior to APM implementation, around 20% of Maryland patients received care outside of urban teaching hospitals. After APM implementation, less than 6% of patients received care outside of urban teaching hospitals (p = 0.003). Implementation of the APM in Maryland also resulted in fewer pediatric craniofacial fracture admissions than New Jersey, though this only reached borderline significance (adjusted difference-in-differences estimate: -1.1 fewer admissions, 95% confidence interval: -2.1 to 0.0, p = 0.05). Inpatient costs for pediatric craniofacial care and mean did not change post-APM. CONCLUSIONS: Maryland's APM consolidated pediatric craniofacial fracture inpatient care at urban, teaching hospitals. Inpatient costs and lengths of stay did not change after policy implementation, but overall admission rates decreased. Such considerations are important when considering national expansion of global hospital budgeting.
Authors: Heather Beil; Susan G Haber; Katherine Giuriceo; Peter Amico; Marisa Morrison; Christopher Beadles; Olivia Berzin; Maggie Cole-Beebe; Leslie Greenwald; Linda Jiang; Rebecca Perry; Alton Wright Journal: Med Care Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Andrew B Crocker; Alexander Zeymo; Kitty Chan; David Xiao; Lynt B Johnson; Nawar Shara; Thomas DeLeire; Waddah B Al-Refaie Journal: Surgery Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Sara K Pasquali; Jennifer S Li; Danielle S Burstein; Shubin Sheng; Sean M O'Brien; Marshall L Jacobs; Robert D B Jaquiss; Eric D Peterson; J William Gaynor; Jeffrey P Jacobs Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Raj M Vyas; Brian P Dickinson; Kristy L Wasson; Jason Roostaeian; James P Bradley Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 1.046