| Literature DB >> 34707664 |
Shu Huang1, Yong Xie1, Zhiyan Huang2,3, Guimin Zhang2,3, Guanyu Chen1, Jun Yuan1, Jing Wang1, Liu Xiangyang1, Yizhao Zhou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of Shou Hui Tong Bian capsule (polygonum multiflorum and aloe-based herbal capsule for cathartic effect) in rapid rehabilitation of joint surgery.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34707664 PMCID: PMC8545539 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2268464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Comparison of clinical effects between the two groups under arthroscopy.
| Group | No. of cases | No. of cured cases | Markedly effective cases | Effective cases | Invalid cases | Total effective rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 24 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 66.7 |
| Observation | 24 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 83.3 |
P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Comparison of clinical effects of joint replacement in two groups.
| Group | No. of cases | No. of cured cases | Markedly effective cases | Effective cases | Invalid cases | Total effective rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 25 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 64.0 |
| Observation | 25 | 0 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 84.0 |
P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Comparison of recovery time of borborygmus and postoperative exhaust time between the two groups under arthroscopy (X ± s).
| Group | No. of cases | Borborygmus recovery time (h) | Postoperative exhaust time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 24 | 6.24 ± 3.32 | 9.00 ± 4.48 |
| Observation | 24 | 3.08 ± 1.38 | 4.57 ± 2.24 |
P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Comparison of borborygmus recovery time and postoperative exhaust time between the two groups of patients undergoing joint replacement (X ± s).
| Group | No. of cases | Borborygmus recovery time (h) | Postoperative exhaust time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 25 | 6.58 ± 4.32 | 8.31 ± 2.48 |
| Observation | 25 | 2.89 ± 1.28 | 3.57 ± 1.15 |
P < 0.05 vs. control group.
Comparison of the number of patients with different abdominal distension degrees between the two groups under arthroscopy.
| Group | No. of cases | Viewing time | Cases with no abdominal distension | Cases with mild abdominal distension | Cases with severe abdominal distension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 24 | Pretreatment | 0 | 13 | 11 |
| After treatment | 8 | 10 | 6 | ||
| Observation | 24 | Pretreatment | 0 | 10 | 14 |
| After treatment | 10 | 11 | 3 |
P < 0.05 vs. same group before treatment; #P < 0.05 vs. control group after treatment.
Comparison of the number of people with different degrees of abdominal distension between the two groups of joint replacement.
| Group | No. of cases | Viewing time | Cases with no abdominal distension | Cases with mild abdominal distension | Cases with severe abdominal distension |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 25 | Pretreatment | 0 | 13 | 12 |
| After treatment | 6 | 11 | 8 | ||
| Observation | 25 | Pretreatment | 0 | 15 | 10 |
| After treatment | 10 | 9 | 6 |
P < 0.05 vs. same group before treatment; #P < 0.05 vs. control group after treatment.