| Literature DB >> 34707622 |
Kyoko Yamazaki1,2, Tamotsu Kato3, Yuuri Tsuboi4, Eiji Miyauchi3, Wataru Suda5, Keisuke Sato1,2, Mayuka Nakajima2, Mai Yokoji-Takeuchi1,2, Miki Yamada-Hara1,2, Takahiro Tsuzuno1,2, Aoi Matsugishi1,2, Naoki Takahashi2, Koichi Tabeta2, Nobuaki Miura6, Shujiro Okuda6,7, Jun Kikuchi4, Hiroshi Ohno3,8, Kazuhisa Yamazaki1,3.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Periodontitis increases the risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we show that gut dysbiosis induced by oral administration of Porphyromonas gingivalis, a representative periodontopathic bacterium, is involved in the aggravation of NAFLD pathology.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; Porphyromonas gingivalis; metabolome; metagenomic analysis; oral–gut connection; periodontitis; periodontopathic bacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34707622 PMCID: PMC8543001 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.766170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Flowchart depicting the experimental workflow.
Figure 6KEGG biomarkers from the metagenomic analysis of gut microbiota. Pathway analysis of differentially enriched genes between two groups. Enriched KEGG pathways (q < 0.1) at TP2 (A) and TP3 (B) are shown. The bubble size indicates the number of KOs enriched in each pathway. Expressions containing inequality signs (e.g., “Pg > Sham”) indicate that the results of enrichment analysis with Kos, in which the abundant of KOs for the left category (Pg mice) are significantly more abundant than those in the right category (Sham mice).
Figure 2Bacterial administration exacerbates high fat diet-induced liver pathology. (A) Changes in body weight and liver/body weight ratios of mice in each group during the experimental period. Pi mice had a significantly lower body weight compared with RC mice at day 28 (n=6-10/group). (B) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver (scale bars, 100 μm). (C) Masson’s trichrome staining of the liver. (D) Hepatic contents of hydroxyproline (n=6-10/group). RC: C57BL/6N mice fed regular chow; Sham: Mice fed CDAHFD60 plus sham administration; Pi: Mice fed CDAHFD60 plus P. intermedia administration; Pg: Mice fed CDAHFD60 plus P. gingivalis administration, An: Mice fed CDAHFD60 plus A naeslundii administration, Vr: Mice fed CDAHFD60 plus V. rogosae administration. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3P. gingivalis administration induces gut barrier dysfunction. (A) Expression of Tjp1 in the small intestines. cDNA was amplified with primers specific for Tjp1 (n=6-10/group). The relative quantity of mRNA was normalized to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of E-cadherin in large intestines from each group. Red: E-cadherin, blue: DAPI, scale bars: 50 μm. (C) Serum endotoxin levels in the various groups (n=6-10/group). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 4Effect of CDAHFD60 feeding and subsequent bacterial administration on the gut microbiota composition (n=6-10/group). Fecal samples from mice in various treatment groups were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing. (A) Alpha diversity of each experimental group at different time points. ASV, Amplicon sequence variant. (B) Principal coordinate analysis score plot of the gut microbiota profiles of each experimental group at different time points using weighted UniFrac distance. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 5Effect of bacterial administration (TP2) and additional diet change (TP3) on the gut microbiota composition (n=6-10/group). Fecal samples from mice that received the various treatments were subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing. (A) Relative abundance of phyla Firmicutes and Bacteridota at TP2. (B) Relative abundances of characteristic genera in each experimental group at TP2. (C) Relative abundance of phyla Firmicutes and Bacteridota at TP3. (D) Relative abundances of characteristic genera in each experimental group at TP3. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. NS, not significant.
Figure 7Effect of CDAHFD60 feeding and subsequent bacterial administration on serum metabolites. (A) PCA of serum metabolites in each group. (B) Machine learning (random forest) classification of each group. Left: confusion matrix (RC, regular chow; Sham, HFD + vehicle; Pi, HFD + Pi; Pg, HFD + Pg). Right: important variables (metabolites) contributing to four classifications. Tyr, tyrosine; CHO, choline; FoA, formate; Gly, glycine; CiA, citrate; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; Ac, acetate; ROI, region of interest. (C) Compounds that differed in abundance among groups (n=6-10/group). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 8Results of functional enrichment analysis. Owing to the large number of significant GO terms (corrected p < 0.05), only the top 15 significant terms from each cluster are shown. For results of KEGG pathway analysis, all significant pathways are presented. Black dots indicate the –log10 of Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected p-values. The top 51 bars show the results of GO enrichment, and the bottom 17 bars show enriched KEGG pathways. Bars showing the associated clusters are indicated.