Literature DB >> 34707378

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.

Lei Yang1, Junxiu Song1, Yubao Wang2, Jing Feng1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is widely used for pulmonary infection; nonetheless, the experience from its clinical use in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections is sparse. This study aimed to compare mNGS results from lung biopsy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and determine their clinical diagnostic efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 106 patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection from May 2018 to January 2020 were included in this retrospective study. All patients' lung biopsy and BALF specimens were collected through bronchoscopy. Overall, 45 (42.5%) patients had pulmonary fungal infection. The performance of lung biopsy and BALF used for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections and identifying pathogens was compared. Additionally, mNGS was compared with conventional tests (pathology, galactomannan test, and cultures) with respect to the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections.
RESULTS: Lung biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS exhibited no difference in terms of sensitivity (80.0% vs 84.4%, P=0.754) and specificity (91.8% vs 85.3%, P=0.39). Additionally, there was no difference in specificity between mNGS and conventional tests; however, the sensitivity of mNGS (lung biopsy, BALF) in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections was significantly higher than that of conventional tests (conventional tests vs biopsy-mNGS: 44.4% vs 80.0%, P<0.05; conventional tests vs BALF-mNGS: 44.4% vs 84.4%, P<0.05). Among 32 patients with positive mNGS results for both biopsy and BALF specimens, 23 (71.9%) cases of consistency between the two tests for the detected fungi and nine (28.1%) cases of a partial match were identified. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve for the combination of biopsy and BALF was significantly higher than that for BALF-mNGS (P=0.018).
CONCLUSION: We recommend biopsy-based or BALF-based mNGS for diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections because of their diagnostic advantages over conventional tests. The combination of biopsy and BALF for mNGS can be considered when higher diagnostic efficacy is required.
© 2021 Yang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; mNGS; sensitivity; specificity

Year:  2021        PMID: 34707378      PMCID: PMC8542593          DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S333818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Drug Resist        ISSN: 1178-6973            Impact factor:   4.003


Introduction

In recent years, with the increase in high-risk groups requiring immunosuppressant use, the prevalence of pulmonary fungal disease has shown a significant upward trend. The main sources of fungal infections in human lungs are opportunistic fungi: Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and endemic fungi. Among them, Aspergillus and Cryptococcus are the main fungal pathogens associated with lung infections.1 Microscopic smears and cultures are conventional microbial methods used for pathogen identification; however, both methods are time consuming and not highly sensitive. The gold standard for the detection of invasive fungal infections is histopathological diagnosis. However, it is time consuming, it cannot identify pathogens, and it has low sensitivity. For Aspergillus infections, the positive predictive value (PPV) of respiratory specimen cultures obtained by sputum induction or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) is low (approximately 72%).2 When testing patients with non-hematological diseases or those who have been treated with antifungal drugs, the PPV may be even lower.3 Clinically, BALF’s galactomannan (GM) test results are affected by various factors, which can lower the sensitivity and increase the false positivity rate.4–7 Since the conventional tests for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections have a low sensitivity and are influenced by various factors, there is an urgent need for new technology with a higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections. Currently, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a widely used method for the clinical detection of pathogens and has obvious advantages in pathogen detection.8 One study showed that mNGS can improve the sensitivity of pathogen detection and that it is less affected by antibiotic exposure before detection.9 In the studies that used mNGS for the detection of lung infections,10–13 there have been advantages identified over traditional detection methods, indicating that mNGS can be used to detect lung infections. However, there is limited experience from the clinical use of mNGS in the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections. In this study, we used bronchoscopy to obtain lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS from 106 patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection to identify pathogens. We compared the mNGS results from lung biopsy and BALF to specifically determine the difference between the two mNGS results and the clinical diagnostic efficacy. Additionally, mNGS (BALF) was compared with conventional tests (pathology, GM test, and cultures).

Patients and Methods

Specimen Collection and Processing

The present study is a retrospective cohort study. Patients admitted to the Respiratory Department at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital for suspected pulmonary fungal infection from May 2018 to January 2020 provided informed consent to undergo bronchoscopy and mNGS. Experienced physicians collected the patient’s lung biopsy and BALF specimens through bronchoscopy based on canonical operational procedures.14 During bronchoscopy, the operating physician recorded complications such as bleeding, fatal hemoptysis, arrhythmia, and death. Six to ten lung biopsy specimens collected from the enrolled patients were used for pathology, rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), and mNGS. Within 2 hours, the lung biopsy specimens were sent to the histopathology laboratory and then processed using standard procedures.15 The remaining lung biopsy specimens were stored at −80°C for mNGS. Part of the BALF was used for fungal and bacterial culture. Another part of the BALF was used for Xpert MTB, GM test, and smear. The remaining BALF specimens were stored at −80°C for mNGS.

mNGS and Analyses

The TIANamp Micro DNA Kit (DP316, TIANGEN BIOTECH) was used to extract the DNA from the BALF and lung biopsy homogenates based on the company’s recommendation. DNA libraries were constructed based on the Beijing Genomics Institute sequencer-100. By removing low-quality and shorter (<35 bp) readings, high-quality sequencing data were generated. Burrows-Wheeler Aligner software was applied to map to a human reference (hg19) to identify human sequence data. Microbial genome databases were used to classify the remaining data.9,16,17 The classification reference databases were downloaded from NCBI ().

Criteria of Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fungal Infection

Pulmonary fungal infection was defined based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)/Mycoses Study Group (MSG) criteria.18 In our study, for proven Invasive Fungal Disease (IFDs), histopathological findings of hyphae on lung biopsy were considered an IFI diagnosis, and this criterion was adapted for any patient. For probable IFDs, experts in the respiratory department of our hospital reviewed the chest CT images of pulmonary fungal infection, which was one of the clinical diagnostic criteria, and evaluated possible mycological evidence such as the GM antigen test. Patients with no proven or probable IFDs throughout the study period were categorized as exclude IFDs. The pathogen responsible for the fungal infections was diagnosed if it met any of the following thresholds. First, culture and/or histopathological examination positive for fungi; it is strongly recommended to use BALF GM to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in immunosuppressed patients.4 Second, at least 50 unique reads from a single species of fungi; for pathogens with unique reads less than 50, the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infection can still be made based on the clinical situation.13

Statistical Analysis

In order to determine the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV), 2×2 contingency tables were derived. All data are reported as the absolute value of their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary fungal infections based on the fungal reads from mNGS and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated after conducting the corresponding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and MedCalc 19 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. The need for informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study and because the data were anonymously analyzed.

Results

Patient Characteristics and mNGS Results

Overall, 106 patients were included in the study; 76 (71.7%) were males, and the average age was 43.2±18.5 years. Eighty-four (79.3%) patients had immunocompromised function, and 79 of them suffered from hematological diseases (Table 1). In total, 45 (42.5%) patients were diagnosed with pulmonary fungal infections (Table 2 and Figure 1).
Table 1

Patient Demographic Characteristics

CharacteristicsPatient, N (%)
Age43.2±18.5
SexMale76 (71.7%)
Female30 (28.3%)
Underlying diseaseImmunocompromised84 (79.3%)
Non-Immunocompromised22 (20.8%)
Table 2
Patient IDSexAge/yrUnderlying DiseaseImmunocompromisedPathology ResultsCulture ResultsGM TestmNGS (Biopsy) Based DiagnosismNGS (BAL) Based DiagnosisFinal Clinical Diagnosis
1Male46ALLYesPink amorphous substance, negative for PAS, hexamine silver and acid-fast stainingMold growthNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
2Male19ALLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasiaViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
3Male43AMLYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
4Male19T lymphoblastic acute leukemiaYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
5Male47NoNoAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with lymphocyte infiltrationViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
6Male63NoNoInterstitial fibrous tissue hyperplasia, scattered lymphocyte infiltration, alveolar epithelial hyperplasia, fibroblast thrombosis in the alveolar cavityViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
7Female14ALLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with lymphocyte infiltrationViridans streptococci, Micrococcus pharyngisNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
8Male11Hodgkin’s LymphomaYesChronic inflammatory cell infiltration in the alveolar compartment,Viridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
9Female39Mixed connective tissue diseaseYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with lymphocyte infiltrationStreptococcus pneumoniaePositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
10Male15ALLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue mild hyperplasia and chronic inflammatory cell infiltration,NegativePositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
11Male25ALLYesInterstitial lymphocytes, plasma cell infiltration, neutrophils, fibrinous exudateCitrobacter koseriPositivePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
12Male68PancytopeniaYesNoViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
13Female51Rheumatoid ArthritisYesFibrous tissue hyperplasia and lymphoid tissue hyperplasia,Viridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
14Male39AMLYesWidened alveolar space, fibrous tissue hyperplasia, focal alveolar hyperplasia, Scattered lymphocytes and tissue cells infiltration, focal carbon dust depositionViridans streptococci, Neisseria siccaNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
15Male52ALLYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
16Female30Chronic gastritisNoAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia, Slurry cellulosic exudateCitrobacter koseriNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
17Male32AMLYesTumorous lesions to be excludedNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
18Male56ALLYesMild hyperplasia of alveolar septal fibrous tissue, focal type II alveolar epithelial hyperplasiaViridans streptococci, Neisseria siccaNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
19Male22ALLYesNecrotic tissueNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
20Male18Acute B lymphocytic lymphomaYesMild hyperplasia of alveolar septum fibrous tissueNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
21Female34NoNoMild hyperplasia of alveolar septum fibrous tissueViridans streptococci, Staphylococcus epidermidisNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
22Male58MDSYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue proliferates, scattered lymphocytes infiltrate, fibroblast thrombus formation in the alveolar cavity,Viridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
23Male68AMLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with chronic inflammatory cell infiltration, local alveolar epithelial hyperplasia,NegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
24Male22ALLYesNoNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
25Female55AMLYesAlveolar septum widening, interstitial fibrous tissue hyperplasia with inflammatory cell infiltrationAcinetobacter baumannii complexPositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
26Male48AMLYesNoViridans streptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
27Female63AMLYesMold hyphaeNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
28Male60AMLYesMucosal lamina propria fibrosis with medium to small nuclei and clusters of cells stained with cytoplasm, not supporting myeloid leukemia cellsNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
29Male47ALLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia, Foamy cell aggregation, No leukemia cells seenViridans streptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
30Male25ALLYesInflammatory exudate and coagulated necrotic tissueMeningeal sepsis Eliza Platinum bacteria, Citrobacter koseriNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
31Female15CMLYesCoagulating necrotic tissue and very little fibrous tissueNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
32Male58AMLYesNo tumor cells seenPseudomonas putida, Stenotrophomonas maltophiliaNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
33Male18ALLYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
34Male54NoNoChronic inflammation of mucosaViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
35Male71MarginalzoneB-cell lymphomaYesChronic inflammatory cell infiltration in alveolar spaceViridans StreptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
36Female41NoNoFibroblast thrombus formation in the alveolar cavityViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
37Female42Acute LaryngitisNoFibrous tissue hyperplasia and lymphocyte infiltrationViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
38Female63CMLYesFibrous tissue hyperplasia, with scattered inflammatory cell infiltrationEnterobacter cloacaeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
39Male22ALLYesInterstitial fibrous tissue hyperplasia with inflammatory cell infiltrationViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
40Male38ALLYesAlveolar septum widening, interstitial fibrous tissue hyperplasiaViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
41Female31AMLYesLegion of FungiEnterobacter cloacaePositivePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
42Female64Postoperative Breast TumorNoChronic inflammatory cell infiltration with mild fibrous tissue hyperplasiaViridans StreptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
43Male42NoNoFibroblast thrombus formation in the alveolar cavityViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
44Male49AMLYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
45Male47Acute leukemiaYesA lot of fungus and a little inflammatory exudateStaphylococcus aureusNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
46Female49ALLYesNoNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
47Male64AMLYesMild proliferation of alveolar septal fibrous tissue with a little lymphocyte infiltrationViridans streptococciPositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
48Male38Immunorelated pancytopeniaYesAlveolar hemorrhage, edema, and hemosiderin depositionNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
49Female43AsthmaNoFibroblast plug formationViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
50Male51AMLYesNoViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
51Male61Diabetes, coronary heart diseaseNoLegion of fungi. methenamine silver stain +.NegativePositivePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
52Male23ALLYesNon-neoplastic lesionsNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
53Male66HypertensionNoFibrous tissue hyperplasia and inflammatory cell infiltration of alveolar septumMicrococcus pharyngisNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
54Male61Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensionNoNon-small cell carcinoma, predisposing to squamous cell carcinomaNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
55Male49Acute nonlymphocytic leukemiaYesPowdery cellulose-like exudate, neutrophils, degenerated and necrotic cellsNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
56Male51AMLYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
57Male30Aplastic anemiaYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with lymphocyte infiltrationNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
58Female46HypertensionNoAlveolar septum widening, interstitial fibrous tissue proliferation and inflammatory cell infiltrationViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionCryptococcal infection
59Male47Aplastic anemiaYesMold clusters, methenamine silver stain +Klebsiella pneumoniaeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
60Male65Hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart diseaseNoLymphocyte infiltration, acute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrationViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
61Male72Lung tumorYesLymphocyte infiltration, alveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasiaViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
62Male11Acute mixed cell leukemiaYesAcute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrationViridans streptococciPositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
63Female64Diabetes, nodular goiterNoAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with chronic inflammatory cell infiltrationEscherichia ColiNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
64Male75Acute leukemiaYesChronic inflammationStaphylococcus epidermidisPositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
65Male73Acute monocytic leukemiaYesInflammatory cell infiltrationNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
66Female33AMLYesAcute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltration, virus infection not excludedNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
67Female18ALLYesAlveolar epithelial hyperplasia, focal fibroblast thrombus formation, mild hyperplasia of alveolar septal fibrous tissue, and organizing lesions not excludedNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
68Male44T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaYesNoNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
69Female10Aplastic anemiaYesMesenchymal tissue and large amount of acute exudateNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
70Male38NoNoLymphocyte infiltration of alveolar septum with fibrous tissue hyperplasia, fibroblast plugMicrococcus pharyngisNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
71Female39LeukemiaYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia with chronic inflammatory cell infiltrationNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
72Male70Diabetes, alcoholic cirrhosisNoNoViridans streptococciPositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
73Male21AMLYesNo tumor cellsNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
74Male38Immunorelated pancytopeniaYesChronic inflammation of the mucosaEnterococcus faecalisNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
75Male13ALLYesLegion of FungiNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
76Male69NoNoChronic inflammation of mucosaViridans streptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
77Male66HypertensionNoProliferation of interstitial fibrous tissue and lymphoid tissue with scattered inflammatory cell infiltration,Viridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
78Male23Acute leukemiaYesNo tumor cellsViridans streptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
79Male58ALLYesAmorphous tissue, small airway mucosa with chronic inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrous tissue proliferationNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
80Male31AMLYesNoViridans streptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
81Male53MDSYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia and local fibroblast thrombus formation.NegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
82Male17AMLYesNoCandida albicansPositivePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
83Male29Aplastic anemiaYesNoAchromobacter xylosoxidansNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
84Male43ALLYesSuspicious fungusNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
85Female9AMLYesNoNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
86Male53AMLYesNo tumor cells seenViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
87Male66NoNoProliferation of interstitial fibrous tissue with scattered inflammatory cell infiltration, fibroblast plugs,Viridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
88Male50HypertensionNoInterstitial fibrous tissue with inflammatory cell infiltration,Viridans streptococciNegativePulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
89Female59LeukemiaYesNoC. glabrata, viridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
90Female56AMLYesMild hyperplasia of alveolar septum fibrous tissueViridans streptococciNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
91Male48Lymphoma, hypertensionYesFibrinous exudative necrosis, a small amount of inflammatory cells and epithelial cellsMold growthPositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
92Female36AMLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasiaNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
93Male35Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaYesMild hyperplasia of alveolar septum fibrous tissueNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
94Male53AMLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasiaNegativePositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
95Female39ALLYesAlveolar septal fibrous tissue hyperplasia, foam-like macrophage aggregation, type II alveolar epithelial hyperplasiaViridans streptococci, staphylococcus epidermidisNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
96Male37MDSYesLegion of fungi. methenamine silver stain +Pseudomonas aeruginosaPositivePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
97Male26AMLYesAlveolar septal hyperplasia, interstitial fibrous tissue hyperplasia with a small amount of inflammatory cell infiltrationNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
98Male77Chronic Lymphocytic LeukemiaYesGranulomatous lesionsNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infection
99Male25ALLYesImmunohistochemical staining excludes leukemia involvementViridans streptococci, Pneumocystis cariniiNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
100Male73Chronic Myelocytic LeukemiaYesAmorphous necrotic tissue with a small amount of neutrophil infiltrationViridans streptococci, corynebacteriumNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
101Female16ALLYesCellulose exudation and foam cells, lymphocyte infiltration and fibrous tissue proliferationMold growthNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
102Female61SLEYesMethenamine silver stain +, cryptococcosisNegativePositivePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
103Female49SLEYesNoMold growthNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
104Male15AMLYesExtruded peripheral lung tissue, individual alveolar cavity expansionNegativeNegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
105Male74Autoimmune hemolytic anemiaYesFungal hyphae and spores, PAS-positive and methenamine silverNegativePositiveExclude pulmonary fungal infectionExclude pulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection
106Female21ALLYesSilk-like structure, histochemical staining shows PAS positive, mold hyphaeNegativeNegativePulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infectionPulmonary fungal infection

Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome.

Figure 1

Methods used to diagnose pulmonary fungal infections.

Patient Demographic Characteristics Abbreviations: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ALL, acute lymphocytic leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome. Methods used to diagnose pulmonary fungal infections.

Comparison Between mNGS and Conventional Tests

Among the 106 patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection, the diagnostic efficacy of mNGS for lung biopsy and BALF is shown in Table 3. The sensitivity and specificity of lung biopsy-mNGS for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections were 80.0% (95% CI, 65.0–89.9%) and 91.8% (95% CI, 81.2–96.9%), and the PPV and NPV were 87.8% (95% CI, 73.0–95.4%) and 86.2% (95% CI, 74.8–93.1%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of BALF-mNGS for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections were 84.4% (95% CI, 69.9–93.0%) and 85.3% (95% CI, 73.3–92.6%), and the PPV and NPV were 80.9% (95% CI, 66.3–90.4%) and 88.1% (95% CI, 76.5–94.7%), respectively.
Table 3

Performance of mNGS and the Conventional Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fungal Infections

Sensitivity % (95% CI)Specificity % (95% CI)PPV % (95% CI)NPV % (95% CI)P valueP value
mNGS (biopsy)80.0a,b (65.0–89.9)91.8A,B (81.2–96.9)87.8 (73.0–95.4)86.2 (74.8–93.1)0.754a0.388A
mNGS (balf)84.4a,c (69.9–93.0)85.3A,C (73.3–92.6)80.9 (66.3–90.4)88.1 (76.5–94.7)0.002b0.774B
Conventional test44.44b,c (30.0–59.9)88.52B,C (77.2–94.9)74.1 (53.4–88.1)68.4 (56.8–78.1)0.0003c0.774C

Notes: Sensitivity: a, biopsy-mNGS vs BALF-mNGS; b, biopsy-mNGS vs conventional test; c, BALF-mNGS vs conventional test. Specificity: A, biopsy-mNGS vs BALF-mNGS; B, biopsy-mNGS vs conventional test; C, BALF-mNGS vs conventional test.

Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.

Performance of mNGS and the Conventional Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fungal Infections Notes: Sensitivity: a, biopsy-mNGS vs BALF-mNGS; b, biopsy-mNGS vs conventional test; c, BALF-mNGS vs conventional test. Specificity: A, biopsy-mNGS vs BALF-mNGS; B, biopsy-mNGS vs conventional test; C, BALF-mNGS vs conventional test. Abbreviations: PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval. The sensitivity and specificity of conventional tests in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections were 44.4% (95% CI, 30.0–59.9%) and 88.5% (95% CI, 77.2–94.9%), whereas the PPV and NPV were 74.1% (95% CI, 53.4–88.1%) and 68.4% (95% CI, 56.8–78.1%), respectively. There was no significant difference in the specificity between mNGS and conventional tests; however, the sensitivity of mNGS (lung biopsy, BALF) in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections was significantly higher than that of conventional tests (conventional tests vs biopsy-mNGS: 44.4% vs 80.0%, P<0.05; conventional tests vs BALF-mNGS: 44.4% vs 84.4%, P<0.05) (Table 3). There were no fungi detected based on the mNGS results for specimens obtained from three patients (patient nos. 91, 101, and 105); nevertheless, the presence of fungi was confirmed in the pathology or culture results. Both mNGS (BALF) and traditional detection methods were positive for pulmonary fungal infections in 19 patients. The pathology of the lung biopsy for 11 patients revealed fungal hyphae. Among all fungal cultures, the fungal culture results for six patients suggested the growth of mold. Of the 10 positive results using BALF from the GM test, six were false positives.

Lung Biopsy and BALF for mNGS

ROC analysis of biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections yielded an AUC of 0.8663 (95% CI, 0.8122–0.9605) and 0.8632 (95% CI, 0.7879–0.9385), respectively (Table 4). Additionally, ROC analysis of mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections yielded an AUC of 0.929 (95% CI, 0.862–0.970) (Table 4). When the threshold was greater than 0.3022, the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) were 77.8% (95% CI, 62.9–88.8%) and 95.1% (95% CI, 86.3–99%), respectively. Pairwise ROC curves are shown in Figure 2 and Table 5. The difference in AUC of the two mNGS was only 0.0231 (P=0.5748). The difference in the AUC between mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) and lung biopsy-mNGS was 0.0423 (P=0.0509). Finally, the difference in AUC between mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) and BALF-mNGS was 0.0654 (P=0.018).
Table 4

Comparison of the ROC for mNGS and the Conventional Tests

Area Under Curve95% Confidence IntervalP value
Biopsy combined balf0.9290.862–0.970P<0.0001
Biopsy0.86630.8122–0.9605P<0.0001
Balf0.86320.7879–0.9385P<0.0001
Figure 2

Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves.

Table 5

Comparison of the Difference in the AUC

Difference Between AreasP value
Biopsy combined balf~ biopsy0.04230.0509
Biopsy combined balf ~ balf0.06540.018
Biopsy ~ balf0.02310.5748
Comparison of the ROC for mNGS and the Conventional Tests Comparison of the Difference in the AUC Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves. The mNGS provided specific sequencing reads of all microorganisms and valid data that can be detected in the sample. Based on the definition for the pathogens responsible for fungal infections, in combination with the patient’s clinical data to exclude some fungi considered for colonization, this study detected pulmonary fungal infections caused by Rhizopus microsporus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus fumigatus, Rhizomucor pusillus, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. In lung biopsy-mNGS, most of the fungi detected were Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus flavus, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Rhizomucor pusillus, and Aspergillus fumigatus (Figure 3A). In mNGS (BALF), most of the fungi detected were Pneumocystis jirovecii, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus flavus, and Rhizomucor pusillus (Figure 3B). The sequencing reads for fungi produced by each sample ranged from 2 to 522,197.
Figure 3

(A) Fungi detected using lung biopsy-mNGS. (B) Fungi detected using BALF-mNGS.

(A) Fungi detected using lung biopsy-mNGS. (B) Fungi detected using BALF-mNGS. The lung biopsy and BALF results for mNGS were positive for the diagnosis of lung fungal infection in 33 cases. The lung biopsy and BALF from patient no. 54 were used for mNGS to detect Aspergillus and Mycobacterium; however, the final clinical diagnosis was tuberculosis. Both tests were negative for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infection in 51 patients. Eight cases were positive for pulmonary fungal infections using mNGS (biopsy) only, and 14 cases were positive for pulmonary fungal infections using mNGS (BALF) only. In 14 cases, we found that Pneumocystis jiroveci was detected by mNGS (BALF) in patient no. 58; however, the final diagnosis was cryptococcal infection. Among the 32 patients whose final diagnoses were pulmonary fungal infections and mNGS results were positive, 23 (71.88%) cases of consistency between the two detected fungi and nine (28.13%) cases of a partial match were identified (Figure 4). With respect to the partially matched results, the mNGS results of the two specimens did not appear to be completely different; nevertheless, they were partially contained.
Figure 4

Consistency of the two specimens for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections. The pie chart shows the positive distribution of 106 cases investigated for pulmonary fungal infections using lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Among the patients whose mNGS results matched for both specimens, the mNGS results of nine patients showed partial matches, 24 patients showed complete matches, but 54 patients had false-positive results.

Consistency of the two specimens for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections. The pie chart shows the positive distribution of 106 cases investigated for pulmonary fungal infections using lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Among the patients whose mNGS results matched for both specimens, the mNGS results of nine patients showed partial matches, 24 patients showed complete matches, but 54 patients had false-positive results. Among 45 patients with a final diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infection, the results from lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS were positive in 32 (75%) patients (Table 6). When multiple types of fungi were detected by mNGS for the two specimens, the fungi with the largest reads were recorded and compared. Among 32 patients with positive mNGS results for both specimens, 27 (84.38%) had more reads of fungi detected by lung biopsy-mNGS than by BALF-mNGS (Figures 5 and 6). In 17 (53.13%) patients, fungal reads detected by lung biopsy-mNGS were more than 10 times greater than those by BALF-mNGS. In 10 patients, the fungal reads detected by lung biopsy-mNGS were between 1 and 10 times greater than those detected by BALF-mNGS. In patient no. 16, the fungal reads detected by BALF-mNGS were significantly greater than those by lung biopsy-mNGS. The fungal reads detected by BALF-mNGS were approximately the same as those by lung biopsy in five patients.
Table 6

Results of the 32 Patients with Matching mNGS Results

Patient IDmNGS (Biopsy, Fungus Detected)mNGS (Balf, Fungus Detected)Final Clinical DiagnosismNGS (Biopsy) /mNGS (BAL)Matching Level
1Rhizopus microsporus (1337)Aspergillus oryzae (3)Rhizopus microsporus (23)Pulmonary fungal infections58Partial match
11Aspergillus oryzae (1257)Aspergillus flavus (1146)Aspergillus oryzae (4)Aspergillus flavus (1)Pulmonary fungal infections314Complete match
16Scedosporium (4)Scedosporium (127)Pulmonary fungal infections0.03Complete match
24Aspergillus oryzae (155)Aspergillus flavus (102)Aspergillus oryzae (11)Aspergillus flavus (6)Pulmonary fungal infections14Complete match
27Aspergillus nidulans (279,595)Rhizomucor pusillus (3861)Aspergillus versicolor (183)Aspergillus calidoustus (175)Aspergillus ustus (137)Aspergillus nidulans (234)Rhizomucor pusillus (6)Pulmonary fungal infections1195Partial match
29Aspergillus fumigatus (922)Aspergillus fischer (5)Aspergillus fumigatus (207)Pulmonary fungal infections4Partial match
31Rhizomucor pusillus (5320)Rhizomucor pusillus (2)Pulmonary fungal infections2660Complete match
41Aspergillus oryzae (863) Aspergillus flavus (207)Aspergillus oryzae (9)Pulmonary fungal infections96Partial match
45Coprinopsis cinerea (1380)Coprinopsis cinerea (49)Pulmonary fungal infections28Complete match
51Aspergillus fumigatus (41,388)Aspergillus fumigatus (74)Pulmonary fungal infections559Complete match
52Pneumocystis jirovecii (12,496)Pneumocystis jirovecii (6566)Pulmonary fungal infections2Complete match
55Aspergillus oryzae (46)Aspergillus oryzae (4) Aspergillus (5)Pulmonary fungal infections12Partial match
57Pneumocystis jirovecii (360)Pneumocystis jirovecii (452)Pulmonary fungal infections0.8Complete match
59Rhizopus microsporus (522,197) Mucor (5755)Rhizopus microsporus (159)Pulmonary fungal infections3284Partial match
65Aspergillus (4)Aspergillus (7)Pulmonary fungal infections0.6Complete match
66Aspergillus (3)Aspergillus flavus (13)Pulmonary fungal infections0.2Complete match
68Rhizopus microsporus (299,937)Mucor (8925)Syncephalastrum (21)Rhizopus microsporus (352)Mucor (8)Aspergillus (5)Pulmonary fungal infections852Partial match
75Aspergillus fumigatus (5938)Aspergillus fumigatus (1178)Pulmonary fungal infections5Complete match
78Aspergillus flavus (2)Aspergillus flavus (3)Pulmonary fungal infections0.7Complete match
79Aspergillus oryzae (150)Aspergillus oryzae (21)Aspergillus (32)Pulmonary fungal infections7Partial match
80Lichtheimia ramosa (196)Rhizomucor pusillus (2)Lichtheimia ramosa (166)Rhizomucor pusillus (39)Pulmonary fungal infections1.2Complete match
82Aspergillus flavus (488)Aspergillus (123)Pulmonary fungal infections4Complete match
83Lichtheimia ramosa (186)Lichtheimia ramosa (149)Pulmonary fungal infections1.2Complete match
84Rhizomucor pusillus (880)Rhizomucor pusillus (9)Pulmonary fungal infections98Complete match
93Pneumocystis jirovecii (321)Pneumocystis jirovecii (4)Pulmonary fungal infections80.2Complete match
96Aspergillus oryzae (1618)Aspergillus flavus (1344)Aspergillus oryzae (330)Aspergillus flavus (266)Pulmonary fungal infections4.9Complete match
97Pneumocystis jirovecii (161,687)Pneumocystis jirovecii (12,504)Pulmonary fungal infections12.9Complete match
99Pneumocystis jirovecii (14,006)Pneumocystis jirovecii (2160)Pulmonary fungal infections6.5Complete match
100Rhizopus oryzae (42)Rhizopus oryzae (2)Pulmonary fungal infections21Complete match
102Cryptococcusmans (557)Cryptococcusmans (12)Pulmonary fungal infections46.4Complete match
103Aspergillus fumigatus (28)Aspergillus fumigatus (20)Pulmonary fungal infections1.4Complete match
106Aspergillus oryzae (1182)Aspergillus oryzae (48) Pneumocystis jirovecii (6)Pulmonary fungal infections24.6Partial match

Abbreviation: mNGS/mNGS (BALF), mNGS (Biopsy) most detected fungal reads/mNGS (BAL) most detected fungal reads.

Figure 5

Comparison of the fungal reads detected by lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Multiple interval: mNGS (Biopsy) most detected fungal reads/mNGS (BAL) most detected fungal reads.

Figure 6

Comparison of the fungal reads detected by mNGS with matching results from both specimens in 32 patients.

Results of the 32 Patients with Matching mNGS Results Abbreviation: mNGS/mNGS (BALF), mNGS (Biopsy) most detected fungal reads/mNGS (BAL) most detected fungal reads. Comparison of the fungal reads detected by lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Multiple interval: mNGS (Biopsy) most detected fungal reads/mNGS (BAL) most detected fungal reads. Comparison of the fungal reads detected by mNGS with matching results from both specimens in 32 patients. The information from the 22 patients with inconsistent mNGS results is shown in Table 7. Among the eight and 13 cases with positive lung biopsy-mNGS and positive BALF-mNGS, four and five cases were eventually diagnosed with pulmonary fungal infections, respectively. Among the above mentioned 22 patients, 12 patients had false-positive mNGS results. Only four and eight cases had positive lung biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS results, respectively. Among the false positive cases, Aspergillus, Pneumocystis jejuni, and Candida albicans were most frequently detected, and in 10 (83.33%) patients, the mNGS reads were less than 20. In patients with false positive results, there was a greater frequency of BALF-mNGS cases than lung biopsy-mNGS; however, this difference was not significant (P>0.05).
Table 7

Sequencing Results for 22 Patients with Inconsistent Lung Biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS

Patient IDmNGS (Biopsy, Fungus Detected)mNGS (BALF, Fungus Detected)Final Clinical Diagnosis
12NegativeCandida albicans (96)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
14NegativeAspergillus fumigatus (201)Pulmonary fungal infection
26Rhizopus microsporus (476)NegativePulmonary fungal infection
30Rhizopus microsporus (3)NegativePulmonary fungal infection
35Aspergillus (3)NegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infection
42Pneumocystis jirovecii (13)NegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infection
46Aspergillus (5)NegativePulmonary fungal infection
48NegativePneumocystis jirovecii (7)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
58NegativePneumocystis jirovecii (2)Pulmonary fungal infection
62NegativeAspergillus (4)Pulmonary fungal infection
64NegativeCandida albicans (13)Aspergillus (5)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
67NegativeAspergillus (3)Pulmonary fungal infection
71Aspergillus (3)NegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infection
73NegativePneumocystis jirovecii (20)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
76Aspergillus (4)NegativePulmonary fungal infection
81NegativeCandida tropicalis (6)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
87NegativeAspergillus (3)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
88Aspergillus (3)NegativeExclude pulmonary fungal infection
89NegativeCandida glabrata (146)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
94NegativeAspergillus fumigatus (4)Pulmonary fungal infection
95NegativePneumocystis jirovecii (15)Exclude pulmonary fungal infection
104NegativeAspergillus fumigatus (9)Pulmonary fungal infection
Sequencing Results for 22 Patients with Inconsistent Lung Biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS

Complications in Bronchoscopy

Among the 106 patients included in this study, lung biopsy and BALF were performed at the same time. During transbronchial lung biopsy, a small amount of bleeding was observed under bronchoscopy in eight patients. After instilling hemocoagulase was injected into the bleeding bronchus through the bronchoscope, no active bleeding was observed under the bronchoscope, and the patient’s safety was not threatened. Among the 106 patients who underwent bronchoscopy, none experienced any complications, including fatal hemoptysis, pneumothorax, arrhythmia, and death.

Discussion

Among high-risk groups of patients with immunosuppression, empirical antifungal therapy is becoming increasingly common, which makes the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections more difficult.19 mNGS has been widely used in infectious diseases, but there is a lack of evidence regarding its use in pulmonary fungal infections. Therefore, this study aimed to address this gap and compare the difference between lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. A previous study reported that mNGS was better than cultures in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections (OR, 4.0 [95% CI, 1.6–10.3], P<0.01).9 In the current study, the specificity of conventional tests did not differ compared to mNGS (conventional tests vs biopsy-mNGS: 88.52% vs 91.8%, P>0.05; conventional tests vs BALF-mNGS: 88.52% vs 85.25%, P>0.05), but the sensitivity of mNGS significantly differed (conventional tests vs biopsy-mNGS: 44.44% vs 80.00%, P<0.05; conventional test vs BALF-mNGS: 44.44% vs 84.44%, P<0.05). The PPV and NPV of conventional tests were 74.07% (95% CI, 53.41–88.13%) and 68.35% (95% CI, 56.80–78.11%), respectively. Since patients with immunodeficiencies were treated with antifungal therapy before the test, the positivity rate of the conventional tests was very low. Compared with the conventional tests, it has been previously reported that mNGS is less affected by antibiotic exposure before detection,9 and that mNGS can detect corresponding pathogens, which is beneficial for targeted treatment. Reviewing the relevant literature, there are many studies on single lung biopsy or BALF for mNGS in pulmonary infections,10,12 but few studies have evaluated simultaneous mNGS using lung biopsy and BALF specimens to diagnose pulmonary fungal infections. In this study involving 106 patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection, mNGS detected fungi in the lung biopsy and/or BALF of 55 patients. The sensitivity of lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections was 80.00% (95% CI, 64.95–89.91%) and 84.44% (95% CI, 69.94–93.01%), whereas their specificity was 91.8% (95% CI, 81.17–96.94%) and 85.25% (95% CI, 73.32–92.62%), respectively; however, these values did not show significant difference (P>0.05). The smaller difference between the two samples in terms of sensitivity might be explained by the fungal infection method (filamentous fungi spread on the surface of lung tissue, and it is often difficult to wash pathogens off using lavage) and the scope of the alveolar lavage (bronchoalveolar lavage involves more lobe segments and more distant sub-segment bronchi). The positivity rate of lung biopsy-mNGS mainly depends on the location of the lesion, such as whether the lesion is connected to the bronchus or close to the surrounding area. In this study, with the assistance of virtual navigation and ROSE, the sensitivity of mNGS (lung biopsy and BALF) was relatively high. ROC analysis of lung biopsy-mNGS for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections yielded an AUC of 0.8663 (95% CI, 0.8122–0.9605). ROC analysis of BALF-mNGS for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections yielded an AUC of 0.8632 (95% CI, 0.7879–0.9385). The difference in the AUC of the two samples evaluated using mNGS was only 0.0.231 (P=0.5748). These findings highlight that mNGS (regardless of whether the test specimen was a lung biopsy or BALF) is a better detection method for the diagnosis of pulmonary fungal infections. The difference in the AUC between the mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) and the mNGS (lung BALF) was 0.0654 (P=0.018). Thus, we found that mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) had a better diagnostic value than BALF-mNGS. The difference in the AUC between the mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) and the mNGS (lung biopsy) was 0.0423 (P=0.0509). Thus, the mNGS (combination of biopsy and BALF) was not better than the lung biopsy-mNGS, possibly because the sample size was not large enough to show a significant difference. The study detected fungal infections of the lungs caused by Rhizopus microsporus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus oryzae, Aspergillus fumigatus, Rhizomucor pusillus, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. These findings are similar to those reported by Li et al,1 but the current study only identified one case of cryptococcal infection. In this study, among 32 patients whose lung biopsy and BALF were both positive on the basis of mNGS and were thus diagnosed with pulmonary fungal infection, 23 (71.88%) cases of a complete match between the two detected fungi and nine (28.13%) cases of a partial match were identified. The results from the two different specimens did not completely differ; however, the mNGS results matched completely or contained each other. The findings of this study indicated that lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS showed specific consistency in fungal detection. Out of 32 patients with positive mNGS results for both specimens, 27 (84.38%) had more reads of fungi detected by lung biopsy-mNGS than by BALF-mNGS. Reads of fungi detected by lung biopsy-mNGS were more than 10 times greater than those detected by BALF-mNGS in 17 (53.13%) patients. These findings suggest that the reads of fungi detected by BALF-mNGS were generally small, which may be related to the fungal infection method (filamentous fungi spread on the surface of lung tissue, and it is often difficult to wash pathogens off using lavage). When lung tissues are obtained from the target site of the lesion and used for mNGS, the fungal reads can be detected several times higher than that with BALF. In this study, 22 patients had inconsistent results from lung biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS. The mNGS results were positive for lung biopsy and negative for BALF in eight patients; this might be attributed to the fact that the fungi are filamentous and spread on the tissue surface, which is difficult to wash down using bronchoalveolar lavage. Furthermore, the mNGS results were negative for lung biopsy and positive for BALF in 14 patients, which might be explained by the fact that the bronchi are not connected to the lesion site or the lesion tissue is not obtained; however, the alveolar lavage involves a wider range. Since the lavage fluid involves more leaf segments and a more distant sub-segment bronchus, which involves a wider range, we found that BALF-mNGS had more false positive results than lung biopsy. However, this difference was not significant (P>0.05), which may be a result of the small sample size. This study was subject to several limitations which merit mentioning here. To date, the mNGS test used in this study has been delivered to commercial laboratories, but not to the hospital’s microbiology laboratory. This may increase the turnaround time and reduce the storage capacity, thus reducing the sensitivity of the test. Additionally, the sample size included in this study was not large, which caused a slight deviation in the ROC curve drawn.

Conclusion

This study showed that mNGS has obvious advantages when compared with conventional tests in pulmonary fungal infection. Additionally, there is no difference in diagnostic performance between lung-biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS. However, lung-mNGS can generally detect several times the fungal reads when compared to BALF-mNGS. Lung biopsy or BALF for mNGS is recommended for patients with suspected pulmonary fungal infection to identify the pathogen as early as possible. The combination of biopsy and BALF for mNGS may be considered when higher diagnostic efficacy is required.
  19 in total

1.  Intravenous PLASMA-LYTE as a major cause of false-positive results of platelia Aspergillus test for galactomannan detection in serum.

Authors:  Zdenek Racil; Iva Kocmanova; Martina Lengerova; Jana Winterova; Jiri Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Gluconate-containing intravenous solutions: another cause of false-positive galactomannan assay reactivity.

Authors:  Ignace Surmont; Willem Stockman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease.

Authors:  Keith C Meyer; Ganesh Raghu; Robert P Baughman; Kevin K Brown; Ulrich Costabel; Roland M du Bois; Marjolein Drent; Patricia L Haslam; Dong Soon Kim; Sonoko Nagai; Paola Rottoli; Cesare Saltini; Moisés Selman; Charlie Strange; Brent Wood
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Microbiological Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing When Applied to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Qing Miao; Yuyan Ma; Qingqing Wang; Jue Pan; Yao Zhang; Wenting Jin; Yumeng Yao; Yi Su; Yingnan Huang; Mengran Wang; Bing Li; Huaying Li; Chunmei Zhou; Chun Li; Maosong Ye; Xiaoling Xu; Yongjun Li; Bijie Hu
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Pathogens in patients with granulomatous lobular mastitis.

Authors:  Jiachuan Wang; Hua Xu; Zhixin Li; Fang Li; Ye Yang; Xuewen Yu; Dan Jiang; Li Xing; Huili Sun; Mumin Shao
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Detection of Pulmonary Infectious Pathogens From Lung Biopsy Tissues by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Henan Li; Hua Gao; Han Meng; Qi Wang; Shuguang Li; Hongbin Chen; Yongjun Li; Hui Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.293

7.  Microbiological Laboratory Testing in the Diagnosis of Fungal Infections in Pulmonary and Critical Care Practice. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Chadi A Hage; Eva M Carmona; Oleg Epelbaum; Scott E Evans; Luke M Gabe; Qusay Haydour; Kenneth S Knox; Jay K Kolls; M Hassan Murad; Nancy L Wengenack; Andrew H Limper
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Ying Li; Bing Sun; Xiao Tang; Ya-Lan Liu; Hang-Yong He; Xu-Yan Li; Rui Wang; Fei Guo; Zhao-Hui Tong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 10.  High-Throughput Metagenomics for Identification of Pathogens in the Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Na Li; Qingqing Cai; Qing Miao; Zeshi Song; Yuan Fang; Bijie Hu
Journal:  Small Methods       Date:  2020-12-13
View more
  5 in total

1.  The Value of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Hematological Malignancy Patients with Febrile Neutropenia After Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Failure.

Authors:  Meng Zhang; Zhao Wang; Jiaxi Wang; Hairong Lv; Xia Xiao; Wenyi Lu; Xin Jin; Juanxia Meng; Yedi Pu; MingFeng Zhao
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bronchoalveolar lavage diagnostics in patients with lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Xue Yang; Junli Wang; Jian Xu; Mengyi Wang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.573

3.  Case Report: A Case of Acute T Lymphoblastic Leukemia With Mixed Infection of Lethal Invasive Mucormycosis and Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Qingya Cui; Haiping Dai; Depei Wu; Jun He; Yang Xu; Xiaowen Tang; Jie Xu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shujun Bao; Huihui Song; Yang Chen; Caiming Zhong; Hao Tang
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.073

5.  Successful treatment of Talaromyces marneffei pneumonia in a HIV-negative renal transplantation recipient: A case report.

Authors:  De-Han Cai; Jun Wang; Xiao-Lin Fang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.