| Literature DB >> 34707069 |
Takashi Fujii1, Kohsuke Teranishi2, Kenji Yatomi2, Kazumoto Suzuki2, Yumiko Mitome-Mishima2, Akihide Kondo2, Hidenori Oishi1,2.
Abstract
Flow diverter (FD) therapy using Pipeline embolization device (PED) has become an important alternative to treat internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. Herein, we report the long-term outcome for 3 years after FD therapy using PED for ICA aneurysms in Japan. The patients who underwent angiographical and/or clinical follow-up for 3 years after the FD therapy using PED of large or giant unruptured ICA aneurysms from December 2012 at our university hospital are the subjects of this study. We retrospectively reviewed the in- and outpatients' medical charts, and written operative and radiological records. There were 84 patients with 90 aneurysms who could be clinically and/or angiographically followed up for 3 years. Of these, 7 aneurysms were only available for clinical follow-up. Of the remaining 83 aneurysms, 6 aneurysms had vessel occlusion due to stent thrombosis or parent artery occlusion, and 60 of the remaining 77 (77.9%) had complete occlusion. In multivariate analysis, older age (>70 years), wide neck, and non-adjunctive coiling contributed statistically significantly to incomplete occlusion. Of the 84 patients, 2 patients (2.4%) had delayed complications between 6 months and 3 years after the initial FD placement. Three patients (3.6%) had poor outcome due to postoperative major stroke complications, 2 of which were acute complications. The long-term results after FD therapy are good both angiographically and clinically. Endothelialization of the aneurysmal neck and intra-aneurysmal thrombosis contribute to complete occlusion. The primary reason for the somewhat low complete occlusion in Japan may be the patients are generally older.Entities:
Keywords: aneurysm; flow diverter; long-term outcome
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34707069 PMCID: PMC8754679 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) ISSN: 0470-8105 Impact factor: 1.742
Clinical characteristics of 84 patients with 90 aneurysms
| Parameters | Data |
|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD, years | 61.5 ± 13.2 |
| Sex, female/male (% of females) | 73/11 (86.9%) |
| Aneurysm side, right/left | 42/48 |
| Aneurysm locations, n (%) | |
| C2 | 44 (48.9) |
| C3 | 4 (4.4) |
| C4 | 42 (46.7) |
| Aneurysm measurement, mean ± SD, mm | |
| Dome size | 16.6 ± 6.8 |
| Neck size | 8.4 ± 4.8 |
| Aneurysm morphology, n (%) | |
| Saccular | 35 (38.9) |
| Fusiform | 55 (61.1) |
| Asymptomatic aneurysms, n (%) | 51 (56.7) |
| Headache unrelated to aneurysm, n (%) | 9 (10.0) |
| Symptomatic aneurysms, n (%) | 30 (33.3) |
| Visual pathway dysfunction | 7 (7.8) |
| Extraocular nerve dysfunction | 22 (24.4) |
| Pituitary dysfunction | 1 (1.1) |
| Number of implanted PED devices, mean ± SD | 1.4 ± 1.1 |
| Number of implanted PED devices, n (%) | |
| 1 | 70 (77.8) |
| 2 | 12 (13.3) |
| ≥3 | 8 (8.9) |
| Adjunctive coiling, n (%) | 29 (32.2) |
PED: Pipeline embolization device, SD: standard deviation.
Fig. 1Trends in occlusion rates after PED for intracranial aneurysms. OKM grade indicates O’Kelly-Marotta grade. PED: Pipeline embolization device.
Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of complete occlusion and incomplete occlusion for intracranial aneurysms
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio | P Value | Odds ratio | P Value | |
| Age, >70 years | 2.71 | 0.128 | 71.7 | 0.00601 |
| Sex, male | 0.361 | 0.155 | 6.02 | 0.169 |
| Location | ||||
| C2 | Control | NA | Control | NA |
| C3 | 0.265 | 0.213 | 5.96 × 10-8 | 0.995 |
| C4 | 1.06 | 0.333 | 0.158 | 0.234 |
| Morphology, saccular (control: fusiform) | 0.127 | 0.000764 | 0.0625 | 0.066 |
| Aneurysm size | ||||
| Dome size (control: 10–14.9 mm) | ||||
| 15–24.9 mm | 3.64 | 0.0421 | 2.76 | 0.287 |
| ≥25 mm | 32.8 | 0.00405 | 21 | 0.13 |
| Neck size (control: -5.9 mm) | ||||
| 6–9.9 mm | 2.94 | 0.202 | 10.3 | 0.0948 |
| ≥10 mm | 34.7 | 0.000383 | 39.7 | 0.0339 |
| Adjunctive coiling | 0.0714 | 0.013 | 0.0325 | 0.0349 |
NA: not applicable.
Fig. 2(A) Left internal carotid angiogram showing a large, regular, fusiform aneurysm with dome size of 13.1 mm and neck size of 8.3 mm located in the C4 segment of the ICA (black arrow). PAO was performed for the right internal carotid aneurysm 2 years earlier, and the left internal carotid angiogram showing collateral blood flow through the anterior communicating artery. (B) Multiple PED was placed (black arrow). (C and D): Angiogram at 6 months and 1 year later showing incomplete occlusion of OKM grade B. (E) Angiogram at 3 years later showing complete occlusion of OKM grade D. ICA: internal carotid artery, OKM: O’Kelly-Marotta, PAO: parent artery occlusion, PED: Pipeline embolization device.
Fig. 3(A) Left internal carotid angiogram showing a large, irregularly shaped, saccular aneurysm (arrow) with dome size of 11.7 mm and neck size of 6.4 mm located in the C2 segment of the left ICA. (B) A 5 × 20 mm PED was placed (arrows). (C) Angiogram at 1 year later showing complete occlusion of OKM grade D. (D) Anticoagulants were started due to atrial fibrillation, and subsequent angiogram at 3 years showed recanalization of OKM grade B (arrow). ICA: internal carotid artery, OKM: O’Kelly-Marotta, PED: Pipeline embolization device.