Chang Zeng1, Joseph Everett2, Stephanie Sidow2, Brian E Bergeron2, Fucong Tian2, Jingzhi Ma3, Franklin R Tay4. 1. Department of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 2. The Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Stomatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: majingzhi2002@163.com. 4. The Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address: ftay@augusta.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of two sonic-powered irrigation systems, EDDY and EndoActivator, in killing intracanal biofilms. METHODS: Eighty-three instrumented, autoclaved single-rooted human premolars were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) for 21 days to generate mature, single-species biofilms. The teeth were devided into four groups: irrigation with saline (N = 11); irrigation with 2% NaOCl without agitation (N = 24); irrigation with 2% NaOCl with agitation by the EndoActivaor (N = 24); irrigation with 2% NaOCl with agitation by the EDDY (N = 24). Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and XTT assay were used to evaluate bacterial load. Additional teeth were split into root-halves for fluorescence staining to examine the percentages of live/dead bacteria in the dentinal tubules present in different canal locations (coronal, mid-root and apical portions). RESULTS: Agitation of 2% NaOCl by EDDY or EndoActivator reduced bacteria load more proficiently than the use of 2%NaOCl without agitation (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected between the two sonic-powered irrigant agitation systems (p > 0.05). Confocal laser scanning microscopy indicated that both devices had better intratubular bacteria killing efficacy than the use of 2% NaOCl only in all parts of the canal space (p < 0.05), with no significant difference detected between EDDY and EndoActivator (p > 0.05). Elimination of intracanal and intratubular bacteria were less efficient in the apical portion of the canal space for all experimental groups. CONCLUSION: The two sonic-powered irrigant activation systems demonstrated comparable intracanal bacteria reduction efficacy when 2% NaOCl was used for disinfecting E. faecalis biofilms in single-rooted teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: With the use of 2% NaOCl as irrigant, the EDDY and EndoActivator sonic-powered irrigant agitation systems have improved and equivalent intracanal bacteria reduction efficacy but are incapable of completely killing all bacteria that resided within the dentinal tubules of root canals.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of two sonic-powered irrigation systems, EDDY and EndoActivator, in killing intracanal biofilms. METHODS: Eighty-three instrumented, autoclaved single-rooted human premolars were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC-29212) for 21 days to generate mature, single-species biofilms. The teeth were devided into four groups: irrigation with saline (N = 11); irrigation with 2% NaOCl without agitation (N = 24); irrigation with 2% NaOCl with agitation by the EndoActivaor (N = 24); irrigation with 2% NaOCl with agitation by the EDDY (N = 24). Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts and XTT assay were used to evaluate bacterial load. Additional teeth were split into root-halves for fluorescence staining to examine the percentages of live/dead bacteria in the dentinal tubules present in different canal locations (coronal, mid-root and apical portions). RESULTS: Agitation of 2% NaOCl by EDDY or EndoActivator reduced bacteria load more proficiently than the use of 2%NaOCl without agitation (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected between the two sonic-powered irrigant agitation systems (p > 0.05). Confocal laser scanning microscopy indicated that both devices had better intratubular bacteria killing efficacy than the use of 2% NaOCl only in all parts of the canal space (p < 0.05), with no significant difference detected between EDDY and EndoActivator (p > 0.05). Elimination of intracanal and intratubular bacteria were less efficient in the apical portion of the canal space for all experimental groups. CONCLUSION: The two sonic-powered irrigant activation systems demonstrated comparable intracanal bacteria reduction efficacy when 2% NaOCl was used for disinfecting E. faecalis biofilms in single-rooted teeth. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: With the use of 2% NaOCl as irrigant, the EDDY and EndoActivator sonic-powered irrigant agitation systems have improved and equivalent intracanal bacteria reduction efficacy but are incapable of completely killing all bacteria that resided within the dentinal tubules of root canals.
Authors: Hind Al-Zuhair; Zheng Su; He Liu; Zhejun Wang; Markus Haapasalo; Ahmed Hieawy; Yuan Gao; Ya Shen Journal: Odontology Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 2.634