| Literature DB >> 34705108 |
Alexis Dupuy1,2, Anthony Birat1, Olivier Maurelli3,4, Yoann M Garnier1, Anthony J Blazevich5, Mélanie Rance2, Sébastien Ratel6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that prepubertal boys, but not untrained men, would exhibit a similar post-exercise parasympathetic reactivation as well-trained adult male endurance athletes.Entities:
Keywords: Autonomic nervous system; Growth; Heart rate variability; Recovery; Trained athletes
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34705108 PMCID: PMC8548865 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04823-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol ISSN: 1439-6319 Impact factor: 3.078
Participants’ physical characteristics
| C | EA | UA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 12.3 ± 1.6 | 24.5 ± 4.8*** | 21.8 ± 2.2***,a |
| Years to (from) APHV | − 2.3 ± 1.2 | – | – |
| APHV (year) | 14.5 ± 0.6 | – | – |
| Height (cm) | 154.3 ± 11.2 | 175.1 ± 7.0*** | 176.7 ± 7.2*** |
| BM (kg) | 43.5 ± 9.9 | 65.5 ± 8.6*** | 71.6 ± 12.5*** |
| BMI (kg m−2) | 18.0 ± 2.0 | 21.1 ± 2.0*** | 22.8 ± 2.8***,a |
Values are means ± SD
C children, EA well-trained adult endurance athletes, UA untrained adults, APHV age at the peak height velocity, BM body mass, BMI body mass index
aSignificantly different from well-trained adult endurance athletes, p < 0.05
***Significantly different from children, p < 0.001
Physiological variables measured at rest and after completion of maximal exercise
| C | EA | UA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resting conditions | |||
| HRrest (bpm) | 86.9 ± 12.0 | 66.8 ± 10.2*** | 73.7 ± 10.1** |
| [La]rest (mmol L−1) | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 0.5 |
| After maximal exercise | |||
| | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 4.4 ± 0.6*** | 3.5 ± 0.4***,a |
| | 51.6 ± 7.5 | 67.3 ± 4.4*** | 48.4 ± 3.7a |
| MAS (km h−1) | 13.0 ± 1.5 | 18.9 ± 1.2*** | 14.6 ± 1.1**,a |
| HRmax (bpm) | 205.7 ± 7.4 | 196.4 ± 10.5* | 199.1 ± 9.8 |
| % age-predicted HRmax | 102.9 ± 3.8 | 102.8 ± 5.1 | 103.2 ± 5.1 |
| RER | 1.19 ± 0.05 | 1.20 ± 0.09 | 1.20 ± 0.10 |
| [La]peak (mmol L−1) | 7.6 ± 2.9 | 11.0 ± 2.5* | 11.5 ± 5.2** |
Values are means ± SD
C children, EA well-trained adult endurance athletes, UA untrained adults, HR resting heart rate, [La] resting blood lactate concentration, O maximum oxygen uptake, BM body mass, MAS maximal aerobic speed, HR maximum heart rate, RER respiratory exchange ratio, [La] peak blood lactate concentration
aSignificantly different from well-trained adult endurance athletes, p < 0.001
*,**,*** Significantly different from children, p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively
Fig. 1Net heart rate recovery (HRR) kinetics measured after the Vam-Eval test in children, untrained adults and well-trained adult endurance athletes. Values are expressed as a percentage of end-exercise peak heart rate. * Significantly different from children; # significantly different from well-trained adult endurance athletes. One item p < 0.05, two items p < 0.01, and three items p < 0.001
Fig. 2Time course of the natural logarithm of the root mean square of successive differences in R–R intervals measured over consecutive 30 s windows (Ln rMSSD30) during the 5 min post-exercise recovery period in children, untrained adults and well-trained adult endurance athletes. * Significantly different from children; # significantly different from well-trained adult endurance athletes; + significantly different from the end-exercise value. One item p < 0.05, two items p < 0.01, and three items p < 0.001
Fig. 3Time course of blood lactate concentration following the Vam-Eval test in children, untrained adults and well-trained adult endurance athletes. Measurements were done at rest and 1, 3 and 5 min after completion of the Vam-Eval test