Literature DB >> 34705107

Intraoperative frozen section analysis of para-aortic lymph nodes after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX: will it soon become useless?

Jonathan Garnier1, Cloe Magallon2, Jacques Ewald2, Anaïs Palen2, Ugo Marchese2, Jean-Robert Delpero3, Olivier Turrini3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positive para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) (station 16) are commonly detected in the final pathologic examination (ranging from 15 to 26%) among patients who undergo upfront pancreatoduodenectomy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) the role of positive PALN as a watershed for surgical resection remains unclear. We aimed to determine the incidence of intraoperative detection of PALN after NAT with FOLFIRINOX for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and its impact on survival, as our policy was to not resect the tumor in such situations.
METHODS: From January 2014 to December 2020, 136 patients with non-metastatic cancer who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and underwent explorative laparotomy were included.
RESULTS: Intraoperative positive PALN were observed in 7 patients (5%). Patients had resectable (n = 5) or locally advanced (n = 2) disease at the time of surgery, but none of them underwent surgical resection. Positive PALN were significantly associated with a lower median number of FOLFIRINOX cycles (4 vs. 6, P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in overall survival between patients with positive loco-regional lymph nodes after resection and patients with non-resection owing to positive PALN (22 versus 16 months, P = 0.16), Overall survival with positive PALN, carcinomatosis, and liver metastasis was 16, 14, and 10 months, respectively (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NAT may lower PALN involvement. We have modified our policy, positive PALN after NAT are no longer a contraindication to resection, rather a holistic picture of the disease guides management.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FOLFIRINOX; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma; Para-aortic lymph nodes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34705107     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02334-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  19 in total

1.  Lymphatic flow in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

Authors:  M Kayahara; T Nagakawa; H Kobayashi; K Mori; T Nakano; N Kadoya; T Ohta; K Ueno; I Miyazaki
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Outcomes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma that was not resected because of isolated para-aortic lymph node involvement.

Authors:  U Marchese; J Ewald; M Gilabert; J-R Delpero; O Turrini
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.043

3.  Para-aortic lymph node sampling in pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  L Schwarz; R M Lupinacci; M Svrcek; M Lesurtel; M Bubenheim; H Vuarnesson; P Balladur; F Paye
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Radical surgery of oligometastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  T Hackert; W Niesen; U Hinz; C Tjaden; O Strobel; A Ulrich; C W Michalski; M W Büchler
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Predictors of Resectability and Survival in Patients With Borderline and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer who Underwent Neoadjuvant Treatment With FOLFIRINOX.

Authors:  Theodoros Michelakos; Ilaria Pergolini; Carlos Fernández-Del Castillo; Kim C Honselmann; Lei Cai; Vikram Deshpande; Jennifer Y Wo; David P Ryan; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Janet E Murphy; Ryan D Nipp; Aparna Parikh; Motaz Qadan; Andrew L Warshaw; Theodore S Hong; Keith D Lillemoe; Cristina R Ferrone
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prognostic Impact of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Micrometastasis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Toshiaki Komo; Yoshiaki Murakami; Naru Kondo; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasushi Hashimoto; Naoya Nakagawa; Kazuhide Urabe; Shinya Takahashi; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Modified FOLFIRINOX Versus CISGEM Chemotherapy for Patients With Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (PRODIGE 38 AMEBICA): A Randomized Phase II Study.

Authors:  Jean Marc Phelip; Jérôme Desrame; Julien Edeline; Emilie Barbier; Eric Terrebonne; Pierre Michel; Hervé Perrier; Laetitia Dahan; Vincent Bourgeois; Faiza Khemissa Akouz; Emilie Soularue; Valérie Lebrun Ly; Yann Molin; Thierry Lecomte; François Ghiringhelli; Romain Coriat; Samy Louafi; Cindy Neuzillet; Sylvain Manfredi; David Malka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Downstaging in Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer: A New Population Eligible for Surgery?

Authors:  Isabella Frigerio; Paolo Regi; Alessandro Giardino; Filippo Scopelliti; Roberto Girelli; Claudio Bassi; Stefano Gobbo; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Paola Capelli; Mirko D'Onofrio; Giuseppe Malleo; Laura Maggino; Elena Viviani; Giovanni Butturini
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Lymph node metastases in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas region.

Authors:  A Nakao; A Harada; T Nonami; T Kaneko; H Murakami; S Inoue; Y Takeuchi; H Takagi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Increased Rate of Complete Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for BRCA Mutation Carriers with Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Talia Golan; Alex Barenboim; Guy Lahat; Ido Nachmany; Yacov Goykhman; Einat Shacham-Shmueli; Naama Halpern; Eli Brazowski; Ravit Geva; Ido Wolf; Yuri Goldes; Menahem Ben-Haim; Joseph M Klausner; Nir Lubezky
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.