Tácio de Mendonça Lima1, Marília Berlofa Visacri2, Patricia Melo Aguiar3. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil. 2. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 3. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 580 - Conj. das Químicas - Bloco 13 - Cidade Universitária Butantã, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. aguiar.pm@usp.br.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To summarize the evidence of efficacy and safety of the use of ketamine and esketamine for depression. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and CRD until November 2020. We included systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials on the use of ketamine and esketamine in adult patients with depression. Two authors independently performed the study selection and data extraction. The AMSTAR-2 tool was used to appraise the quality of included reviews. RESULTS: A total of 118 records were identified, and 11 studies fully met the eligibility criteria. Compared to control, ketamine improved the clinical response at 40 min to 1 week and clinical remission at 80 min to 72 h, and esketamine improved both outcomes at 2 h to 4 weeks. Ketamine and esketamine also had a beneficial effect on the depression scales score and suicidality. For adverse events, oral ketamine did not show significant change compared to control, while intranasal esketamine showed difference for any events, such as dissociation, dizziness, hypoesthesia, and vertigo. Most reviews were classified as "critically low quality," and none of them declared the source of funding of the primary studies and assessed the potential impact of risk of bias in primary studies. CONCLUSION: Ketamine and esketamine showed a significant antidepressant action within a few hours or days after administration; however, the long-term efficacy and safety are lacking. In addition, the methodological quality of the reviews was usually critically low, which may indicate the need for higher quality evidence in relation to the theme.
PURPOSE: To summarize the evidence of efficacy and safety of the use of ketamine and esketamine for depression. METHODS: A literature search was performed in Medline, the Cochrane Library, LILACS, and CRD until November 2020. We included systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials on the use of ketamine and esketamine in adult patients with depression. Two authors independently performed the study selection and data extraction. The AMSTAR-2 tool was used to appraise the quality of included reviews. RESULTS: A total of 118 records were identified, and 11 studies fully met the eligibility criteria. Compared to control, ketamine improved the clinical response at 40 min to 1 week and clinical remission at 80 min to 72 h, and esketamine improved both outcomes at 2 h to 4 weeks. Ketamine and esketamine also had a beneficial effect on the depression scales score and suicidality. For adverse events, oral ketamine did not show significant change compared to control, while intranasal esketamine showed difference for any events, such as dissociation, dizziness, hypoesthesia, and vertigo. Most reviews were classified as "critically low quality," and none of them declared the source of funding of the primary studies and assessed the potential impact of risk of bias in primary studies. CONCLUSION: Ketamine and esketamine showed a significant antidepressant action within a few hours or days after administration; however, the long-term efficacy and safety are lacking. In addition, the methodological quality of the reviews was usually critically low, which may indicate the need for higher quality evidence in relation to the theme.
Authors: R M Berman; A Cappiello; A Anand; D A Oren; G R Heninger; D S Charney; J H Krystal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Paul E Greenberg; Andree-Anne Fournier; Tammy Sisitsky; Crystal T Pike; Ronald C Kessler Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Nolan R Williams; Boris D Heifets; Christine Blasey; Keith Sudheimer; Jaspreet Pannu; Heather Pankow; Jessica Hawkins; Justin Birnbaum; David M Lyons; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Alan F Schatzberg Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 18.112