Literature DB >> 34704830

Evaluation of the Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans (PHASER) clinical program at initial test sites.

Olivia M Dong1,2, Megan C Roberts3, R Ryanne Wu1,2, Corrine I Voils4,5, Nina Sperber6, Kara L Gavin4,5, Jill Bates1,7, Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier8, Michael Naglich9, Michael J Kelley1,10,11, Jason L Vassy12,13, Peruvemba Sriram14, C William Heise15,16, Salvador Rivas15,16, Maria Ribeiro17,18, Jennifer G Chapman9, Deepak Voora1,2.   

Abstract

Aim: The first Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle for the Veterans Affairs Pharmacogenomic Testing for Veterans pharmacogenomic clinical testing program is described. Materials & methods: Surveys evaluating implementation resources and processes were distributed to implementation teams, providers, laboratory and health informatics staff. Survey responses were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs to identify implementation barriers. The Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change strategies were used to address implementation barriers.
Results: Survey response rate was 23-73% across personnel groups at six Veterans Affairs sites. Nine Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs were most salient implementation barriers. Program revisions addressed these barriers using the Expert Recommendation for Implementing Change strategies related to three domains.
Conclusion: Beyond providing free pharmacogenomic testing, additional implementation barriers need to be addressed for improved program uptake.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles; Veterans; Veterans Affairs; genetic testing; implementation barriers; pharmacogenomics; precision medicine; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34704830      PMCID: PMC8592066          DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.638


  17 in total

1.  Optimizing drug outcomes through pharmacogenetics: a case for preemptive genotyping.

Authors:  J S Schildcrout; J C Denny; E Bowton; W Gregg; J M Pulley; M A Basford; J D Cowan; H Xu; A H Ramirez; D C Crawford; M D Ritchie; J F Peterson; D R Masys; R A Wilke; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  What will it take to implement genomics in practice? Lessons from the IGNITE Network.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Carol R Horowitz; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 4.  The current state of implementation science in genomic medicine: opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Amy E Kennedy; David A Chambers; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.

Authors:  Mark S Bauer; Laura Damschroder; Hildi Hagedorn; Jeffrey Smith; Amy M Kilbourne
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

6.  Clinically actionable genotypes among 10,000 patients with preemptive pharmacogenomic testing.

Authors:  S L Van Driest; Y Shi; E A Bowton; J S Schildcrout; J F Peterson; J Pulley; J C Denny; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network.

Authors:  Nina R Sperber; Janet S Carpenter; Larisa H Cavallari; Laura J Damschroder; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Joshua C Denny; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Yue Guan; Carol R Horowitz; Kenneth D Levy; Mia A Levy; Ebony B Madden; Michael E Matheny; Toni I Pollin; Victoria M Pratt; Marc Rosenman; Corrine I Voils; Kristen W Weitzel; Russell A Wilke; R Ryanne Wu; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Pharmacogenetic testing in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA): policy recommendations from the VHA Clinical Pharmacogenetics Subcommittee.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Annjanette Stone; John T Callaghan; Margaret Mendes; Laurence J Meyer; Victoria M Pratt; Ronald M Przygodzki; Maren T Scheuner; Jessica Wang-Rodriguez; Steven A Schichman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Projected Prevalence of Actionable Pharmacogenetic Variants and Level A Drugs Prescribed Among US Veterans Health Administration Pharmacy Users.

Authors:  Catherine Chanfreau-Coffinier; Leland E Hull; Julie A Lynch; Scott L DuVall; Scott M Damrauer; Francesca E Cunningham; Benjamin F Voight; Michael E Matheny; David W Oslin; Michael S Icardi; Sony Tuteja
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-06-05

10.  Incorporation of pharmacogenomics into routine clinical practice: the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline development process.

Authors:  Kelly E Caudle; Teri E Klein; James M Hoffman; Daniel J Muller; Michelle Whirl-Carrillo; Li Gong; Ellen M McDonagh; Katrin Sangkuhl; Caroline F Thorn; Matthias Schwab; Jose A G Agundez; Robert R Freimuth; Vojtech Huser; Ming Ta Michael Lee; Otito F Iwuchukwu; Kristine R Crews; Stuart A Scott; Mia Wadelius; Jesse J Swen; Rachel F Tyndale; C Michael Stein; Dan Roden; Mary V Relling; Marc S Williams; Samuel G Johnson
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.731

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Mixed-Methods Protocol to Identify Best Practices for Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Nina R Sperber; Deborah Cragun; Megan C Roberts; Lisa M Bendz; Parker Ince; Sarah Gonzales; Susanne B Haga; R Ryanne Wu; Natasha J Petry; Laura Ramsey; Ryley Uber
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.