| Literature DB >> 34704787 |
Reed M Stubbendieck1, Susan E Zelasko1,2, Nasia Safdar3,4, Cameron R Currie1,5,6.
Abstract
The aerodigestive tract (ADT) is the primary portal through which pathogens and other invading microbes enter the body. As the direct interface with the environment, we hypothesize that the ADT microbiota possess biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for antibiotics and other specialized metabolites to compete with both endogenous and exogenous microbes. From 1,214 bacterial genomes, representing 136 genera and 387 species that colonize the ADT, we identified 3,895 BGCs. To determine the distribution of BGCs and bacteria in different ADT sites, we aligned 1,424 metagenomes, from nine different ADT sites, onto the predicted BGCs. We show that alpha diversity varies across the ADT and that each site is associated with distinct bacterial communities and BGCs. We identify specific BGC families enriched in the buccal mucosa, external naris, gingiva, and tongue dorsum despite these sites harboring closely related bacteria. We reveal BGC enrichment patterns indicative of the ecology at each site. For instance, aryl polyene and resorcinol BGCs are enriched in the gingiva and tongue, which are colonized by many anaerobes. In addition, we find that streptococci colonizing the tongue and cheek possess different ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptide BGCs. Finally, we highlight bacterial genera with BGCs but are underexplored for specialized metabolism and demonstrate the bioactivity of Actinomyces against other bacteria, including human pathogens. Together, our results demonstrate that specialized metabolism in the ADT is extensive and that by exploring these microbiomes further, we will better understand the ecology and biogeography of this system and identify new bioactive natural products. IMPORTANCE Bacteria produce specialized metabolites to compete with other microbes. Though the biological activities of many specialized metabolites have been determined, our understanding of their ecology is limited, particularly within the human microbiome. As the aerodigestive tract (ADT) faces the external environment, bacteria colonizing this tract must compete both among themselves and with invading microbes, including human pathogens. We analyzed the genomes of ADT bacteria to identify biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for specialized metabolites. We found that the majority of ADT BGCs are uncharacterized and the metabolites they encode are unknown. We mapped the distribution of BGCs across the ADT and determined that each site is associated with its own distinct bacterial community and BGCs. By further characterizing these BGCs, we will inform our understanding of ecology and biogeography across the ADT, and we may uncover new specialized metabolites, including antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: Actinomyces; RiPP; Streptococcus; antibiotics; biosynthetic gene cluster; nasal microbiome; natural products; oral microbiome; secondary metabolites; specialized metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34704787 PMCID: PMC8549736 DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.01669-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Human ADT bacteria possess gene clusters for specialized metabolism. (A) Bar chart indicating the total count of BGCs in the eHOMD genomes separated by BGC type. (B) Bar chart indicating the total counts of BGCs in the eHOMD genomes by bacterial genus. (C) Plot indicating the number of BGCs per genome for common ADT bacterial genera. Each point represents a genome from a single strain of the corresponding genus. The vertical black bars represent the median BGC count per genome. (D) Plot indicating the relationship between eHOMD genome size and BGC count. Each point represents a genome from a single strain and is colored by genus as in panel C. The Kendall rank correlation coefficient (τB) and P value between genome size and BGC count is shown in the lower right corner of the panel. Genomes that did not contain BGCs or were <1 Mb in total length were excluded from these analyses. In panels C and D, the shape of the points indicates the source of the strains, with circles representing the genomes of bacteria known to colonize the ADT (eHOMD habitat listed as “Nasal,” “Nasal,Oral,” or “Oral”) and diamonds representing the genomes of environmental bacteria that are transiently found in the ADT (eHOMD habitat listed as “NonOralRef,” “Skin,” “Unassigned,” or “Vaginal”). The points in panels C and D were jittered to avoid overplotting. The data in panels A and B include fragmented BGCs located on contig edges, whereas the data in panels C and D include only genomes where no fragmented BGCs were detected.
BGCs identified in genomes of ADT and environmental bacteria from the eHOMD
| BGC type | Count from ADT bacteria | Count from environmental bacteria | Total count from ADT and environmental bacteria (%) | Count (%) from Aleti et al. ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteriocin | 610 | 252 | 862 (22.1%) | 67 (7.9%) |
| RiPP | 241 | 202 | 443 (11.4%) | 151 (17.7%) |
| NRPS | 129 | 356 | 485 (12.5%) | 101 (11.8%) |
| Terpene | 150 | 296 | 446 (11.5%) | 98 (11.5%) |
| Aryl Polyene | 211 | 99 | 310 (8.0%) | 147 (17.2%) |
| PKS | 105 | 197 | 302 (7.8%) | 85 (10.0%) |
| Siderophore | 100 | 138 | 238 (6.1%) | 28 (3.3%) |
| HSL | 11 | 106 | 117 (3.0%) | 35 (4.1%) |
| Ectoine | 0 | 27 | 27 (0.7%) | 8 (0.9%) |
| Phosphonate | 0 | 18 | 18 (0.5%) | 7 (0.8%) |
| Butyrolactone | 9 | 5 | 14 (0.4%) | 6 (0.7%) |
| Hybrid | 60 | 213 | 273 (7.0%) | 54 (6.3%) |
| Other | 106 | 254 | 360 (9.2%) | 66 (7.7%) |
| Total | 1,732 | 2,163 | 3,895 (100%) | 853 (100%) |
ADT indicates bacteria that are known colonizers of the ADT (eHOMD habitat listed as “Nasal,” “Nasal,Oral,” or “Oral”), and environment indicates environmental bacteria that are transiently found in the ADT (eHOMD habitat listed as “NonOralRef,” “Skin,” “Unassigned,” or “Vaginal”).
The RiPP category contains cyanobactin, glycocin, lantipeptide, lassopeptide, linaridin, microcin, proteusin, sactipeptide, and thiopeptide BGCs.
The PKS category contains other ketosynthase, resorcinol, type I PKS, type II PKS, type III PKS, and transAT-PKS BGCs.
Hybrid indicates two or more BGCs located adjacent to each other within the genome.
The other category contains acyl amino acid BGCs, beta-lactam BGCs, ladderane BGCs, phenazine BGCs, and BGCs that encode a protein involved in specialized metabolism but do not fit into any currently known biosynthetic category.
FIG 2The composition of specialized metabolite BGCs in ADT microbiomes cluster based on site. (A) Metagenomic reads from 1,424 samples (columns) were processed and pseudoaligned onto 2,094 BGCs (rows). The heat map displays the size factor-normalized counts of reads that mapped to each BGC in each sample. BGCs with <100 total normalized reads aligned across all metagenomes were filtered from this heat map. The colored bar at the top of the heat map indicates the body site where the corresponding metagenomic sample was derived. The inset on the right indicates the relative positions of these sites on a sagittal cross section of the human ADT. The palatine tonsil is behind the tongue in this view and saliva is not depicted. The total number of metagenome samples from each ADT site is indicated within parentheses in the key. The colored bars on the left of the heat map indicate the predicted BGC type from antiSMASH, the bacterial genus from which the corresponding BGC was identified, and the source of the strain. ADT indicates bacteria that are known colonizers of the ADT (eHOMD habitat listed as “Nasal,” “Nasal,Oral,” or “Oral”) and Environment indicates environmental bacteria that are transiently found in the ADT (eHOMD habitat listed as “NonOralRef,” “Skin,” “Unassigned,” or “Vaginal”). The columns and rows of the heat map were clustered hierarchically. For clarity, only the clustering dendrogram for the metagenome sites is shown. (B) Stacked bars indicate the relative abundance of different bacterial genera within the corresponding metagenomes in panel A. Inset diagram was illustrated by Julia Buskirk (University of Wisconsin-Madison).
FIG 3Bacterial species and BGC composition vary across the ADT. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots for (A) bacterial species and (B) BGCs detected in ADT metagenomes. Each point represents a single metagenome sample and is colored based on ADT site, as indicated in the key. The ANOSIM R and P values (10,000 permutations) are shown in the top right of each plot. The stress value for each NMDS plot was 0.11.
FIG 4Bacterial species and BGC diversity are correlated across the ADT. Box plots of the Shannon diversity index (H′) for (A) species-level bacterial community and (B) BGC composition in the ADT. The upper and lower bounds of the box plots indicate the 75th and 25th percentiles, respectively. The horizontal black bars indicate the medians. The whiskers extend from the bounds of the box to the largest and smallest values that are no further than ±1.5× the IQR. All outliers that occur outside this range are shown as points. ADT sites that share letters are not significantly different (α = 0.05). The horizontal dashed lines indicate the overall median alpha diversity value for each panel. (C) Plots showing the relationship between H′ at the species and BGC levels. The black lines and colored shading represent the line of best fit and 95% confidence interval, respectively. The correlation coefficients (R2) and P values for linear models are shown in the lower right of each facet. For these analyses, samples with H′species of 0 were removed.
FIG 5Enrichment of BGCs in ADT microbiomes. Bar chart indicating the total count of enriched BGCs in the buccal mucosa, dorsum of tongue, external naris, and gingiva separated by BGC type.
FIG 6Identification of BGC families associated with specific ADT microbiomes. In this network, each node represents a single BGC and edges indicate weighted pairwise distances between the corresponding BGCs. The nodes are colored based on ADT site where that BGC was enriched, and their size is scaled based on the median log10 normalized count value of the BGC in that site (see black circles in the bottom for key). For BGCs that were not enriched in any site, the corresponding node sizes are scaled relative to the median value across all samples and are colored gray. Black diamonds represent characterized BGCs from the MIBiG database 1.4. See Figure S3A and B for the same network but with nodes colored by genus and BGC type, respectively. For clarity, BGC families with few or no enriched clusters were removed from this view.
FIG 7Streptococci from the buccal mucosa and tongue dorsum possess different sets of RiPPs. (A) Subset of the network from Figure 6 showing only RiPP-encoding BGCs predicted from Streptococcus genomes. Black circles represent characterized BGCs from the MIBiG database 1.4 and are labeled with their corresponding RiPP product. The node color and scaling in panel A is consistent with the key in panel B. See Figure 6 legend for specific network details. (B) In this network, each node represents a predicted RiPP core peptide and edges indicate amino acid sequence identity between two nodes (≥80%). The nodes are colored based on ADT site where that BGC was enriched, their shape corresponds to predicted RiPP class, and their size is scaled based on the median log10 normalized count value of the BGC in that site (see top right for key). For BGCs that were not enriched in any site, the corresponding node sizes are scaled relative to the median value across all samples and are colored gray. Black nodes representing known RiPP core peptide sequences are labeled and indicated with an arrow (49, 69). The BlpC and BlpI sequence families were identified by comparison to the NR protein sequence database and are labeled.
FIG 8Antibacterial bioactivity of Actinomyces. (A) Eighteen Actinomyces isolates (horizontal) were monocultured aerobically in BHI agar wells for 1 week before 22 targets (vertical) were spotted adjacent to the Actinomyces colony. The colonies were cultured together for 3 days before inhibition of the targets was scored. The heat map displays the inhibition scores of each target when paired with the corresponding Actinomyces isolate, as indicated in the key below. Each interaction was repeated with ≥2 replicates. The white cells indicate interactions where replicates were in disagreement or the Actinomyces colony overgrew the well before target inoculation. (B) Eight Actinomyces isolates (horizontal) were monocultured anaerobically on BHI agar plates for 1 week before six strains of target bacteria were spotted adjacent to the Actinomyces colonies. The bacteria were cultured together for 1 day before inhibition was scored. The heat map displays the inhibition scores of each target, as in panel A. Each interaction was triplicated and the average inhibition score is reported. For panels A and B, the volunteer ID is indicated in parentheses and the inhibition scoring system is depicted below panel A. (C) Representative photograph of target bacteria cultured without Actinomyces. Each target is indicated by a two-letter abbreviation (see panel B). (D) Representative photograph of Actinomyces sp. isolate p3-SID4123 (center of plate) cultured with target bacteria spotted in the same orientation as that of panel C. The scale bars indicate 5 mm.