Literature DB >> 34704183

A Single-Center Study of Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Mammography Guidelines by Transgender and Non-Binary Patients.

Natalie Luehmann1, Mona Ascha2, Emily Chwa3, Paige Hackenberger2, Kareem Termanini2, Christopher Benning4, Danny Sama4, Dylan Felt5,6, Lauren B Beach5,6, Dipti Gupta7, Swati A Kulkarni1, Sumanas W Jordan8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to screening guidelines among transgender and non-binary (TGNB) populations is not well studied. This study examines breast cancer screening patterns among TGNB patients at an urban academic medical center.
METHODS: Demographic information, risk factors, and screening mammography were collected. Mammography rates were calculated in populations of interest according to national guidelines, and mammogram person-years were also calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed.
RESULTS: Overall, 253 patients were analyzed: 193 transgender women and non-binary people designated male at birth (TGNB DMAB) and 60 transgender men and non-binary people designated female at birth (TGNB DFAB). The median (interquartile range) age was 53.2 years (42.3-62.6). Most patients had no family history of breast cancer (n = 163, 64.4%) and were on hormone therapy (n = 191, 75.5%). Most patients where White (n = 164, 64.8%), employed (n = 113, 44.7%), and had public insurance (n = 128, 50.6%). TGNB DFAB breast screening rates were low, ranging from 2.0 to 50.0%, as were TGNB DMAB screening rates, ranging from 7.1 to 47.6%. The screening rates among the TGNB DFAB and TGNB DMAB groups did not significantly differ from one another. Among TGNB DFAB patients, univariate analyses showed no significant predictors for mammography. Among TGNB DMAB patients, not being on hormone therapy resulted in fewer odds of undergoing mammography. There were no significant findings on multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSION: Mammography rates in the TGNB population are lower than institutional and national rates for cisgender patients, which are 77.3% and 66.7-78.4%, respectively. Stage of transition, organs present, hormone therapy, and risk factors should be considered to guide screening.
© 2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34704183     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10932-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  29 in total

Review 1.  Sexual and Gender Minority Health Care Disparities: Barriers to Care and Strategies to Bridge the Gap.

Authors:  Emily M Lund; Claire M Burgess
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.907

2.  Screening for Abnormal Blood Glucose and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Transgender medicine in primary care.

Authors:  Suja Sukumar; Rajneesh Mittal; Sanjay Kalra
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 0.781

Review 4.  Primary Care in Transgender Persons.

Authors:  Brittany L Whitlock; Elizabeth S Duda; Molly J Elson; Paul Parker Schwab; Ogul Ersin Uner; Shawn Wen; Jason S Schneider
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 5.  Breast Cancer Screening, Management, and a Review of Case Study Literature in Transgender Populations.

Authors:  Madeline B Deutsch; Asa Radix; Linda Wesp
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.303

6.  A long-term follow-up study of mortality in transsexuals receiving treatment with cross-sex hormones.

Authors:  Henk Asscheman; Erik J Giltay; Jos A J Megens; W Pim de Ronde; Michael A A van Trotsenburg; Louis J G Gooren
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 7.  Breast cancer in transgender patients: A systematic review. Part 2: Female to Male.

Authors:  Jill P Stone; Rebecca L Hartley; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities.

Authors:  Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Jo C Phelan; Bruce G Link
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Breast cancer in transgender patients: A systematic review. Part 1: Male to female.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hartley; Jill P Stone; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Differences in Psychosocial Predictors of Obesity Among LGBT Subgroups.

Authors:  Jacob C Warren; K Bryant Smalley; K Nikki Barefoot
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 4.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.