Literature DB >> 34703991

MR-PheWAS for the causal effects of serum magnesium on multiple disease outcomes in Caucasian descent.

Longman Li1,2, Wenjun Yang1,3,4, Lulu Huang1,5, Xiuming Feng1,4, Hong Cheng1,4, Xiaoting Ge1,4, Gaohui Zan1,4, Yanli Tan1,4, Lili Xiao4, Chaoqun Liu6, Xing Chen7, Zengnan Mo1,2, Xiaobo Yang1,4,8.   

Abstract

Magnesium is integral to many physiological processes, whereas variations in its levels, even within the normal range, can have critical implications for health. To explore the broad clinical effects of varying serum magnesium levels, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization and phenome-wide association study (MR-PheWAS) in the UK Biobank cohort. In total, MR-PheWAS analysis implicated a causal role of serum magnesium levels in five disease groups and six disease outcomes. In addition, our study indicated the gender-specific effects of nine disease groups/outcomes in MR estimated effects. The protein-protein interaction network demonstrated an interaction between the serum magnesium-associated gene DCDC1 and the cataract- associated gene PAX6. The present study verified several previously reported disease outcomes and identified novel potential disease outcomes for serum magnesium levels. The DCDC1 gene and the PAX6 gene may be the new targets for promoting the treatments of cataracts using magnesium intervention.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Clinical medicine; Complex system biology; Medicine; Omics; Pathophysiology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34703991      PMCID: PMC8521184          DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  iScience        ISSN: 2589-0042


Introduction

As an essential mineral in humans, magnesium is the fourth most abundant mineral and the second most abundant intracellular divalent cation (Volpe, 2013). Magnesium is consumed primarily through food, especially those rich in dietary fiber, unrefined (whole) grains, nonstarchy vegetables (spinach), fruits, nuts, legumes, potatoes (tubers), and dairy products (Wark et al., 2012). The recommended dietary allowance of magnesium is 80 mg/d for children aged 1–3 y, 130 mg/d for children aged 4–8 y, 240 mg/d for juniors aged 9–13 y, and 420 mg/d (males) or 320 mg/d (females) for adults aged 31 y and older (Institute of Medicine Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference I, 1997). Generally, magnesium is mostly stored in the bone, tissues, organs, and blood, while mainly being excreted through the urine (Volpe, 2013). Moreover, magnesium is mainly involved in the processes of protein synthesis, cellular energy production and storage, reproduction, DNA and RNA synthesis, and stabilizing mitochondrial membranes (Bohl and Volpe, 2002; Burgess et al., 2015; Chubanov et al., 2005; Newhouse and Finstad, 2000). In addition, magnesium plays a critical role in maintaining normal nerve and muscle function, cardiac excitability (normal heart rhythm), neuromuscular conduction, muscular contraction, vasomotor tone, blood pressure, bone integrity, and glucose and insulin metabolism (Barbagallo et al., 2003; Bohl and Volpe, 2002; Burgess et al., 2015; Chubanov et al., 2005; Guerrero-Romero and Rodriguez-Moran, 2000, 2002; He et al., 2006; Lopez-Ridaura et al., 2004; McCarty, 2005; Murakami et al., 2005; Newhouse and Finstad, 2000; Paolisso and Barbagallo, 1997; Soltani et al., 2005). In this regard, magnesium deficiencies and excesses have been associated with some chronic diseases. A comprehensive search strategy study and a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial have both demonstrated that magnesium supplementation has significant effects on relieving migraine headaches (Pringsheim et al., 2012; Tarighat Esfanjani et al., 2012). A Mendelian randomization (MR) study in European ancestry individuals supported the longstanding hypothesis that magnesium supplementation can increase the risk of developing both rheumatoid arthritis and Alzheimer's disease, using databases of the International Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Alliance and the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project, respectively (Cheng et al., 2019). Based on the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease cohort recruited in eastern Finland, a long-term prospective cohort study has suggested that low serum magnesium levels are independently associated with increasing both the total risk of fracture and the femoral fracture risk in middle-aged Caucasian men (Kunutsor et al., 2017). Using the method of meta-analysis and systematic reviews to evaluate the effects of magnesium supplementation on hypertension, a few studies have found that higher doses of magnesium lead to greater reductions in blood pressure (Lawton et al., 2017; Volpe, 2013). Traditional epidemiological studies (such as cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies) into the effects of serum magnesium levels can be hindered by unmeasured and unknown factors, as well as potential confounding factors and reverse causation bias from outcomes that affect the serum magnesium levels. Moreover, a traditional epidemiological study design can test only one (or a limited number of) association(s) between the exposure and one (or a few) predefined outcome(s). In recent years, an integrating method known as Mendelian randomization and phenome-wide association study (MR-PheWAS) analysis has been proposed to build a hypothesis-searching approach that is aimed at exploring potential causal relationships between an exposure (using exposure-associated genetic loci as the instrumental variable) and a large range of phenome-wide disease outcomes in a high-throughput manner (Li et al., 2018b). This method allows for the rapid and effective evaluation or replication of potential health implications attributable to varying an exposure of interest found in epidemiological studies, as well as the ability to discover new relationships and generate new hypotheses for further targeted study (Denny et al., 2013). However, there has been no systematic study assessing the causal effects of serum magnesium levels on multiple disease outcomes. Here, we performed an MR-PheWAS using the UK Biobank database to discover a wide range of disease outcomes related to genetic variations of serum magnesium levels and to investigate if any association is causal.

Results

Demographic characteristics

The demographic data is shown in Table 1. The participants consisted of 202,177 females (53.72%) and 174,169 males (46.28%). Age, body mass index (BMI), drinking status, and smoking status were all different between females and males (p < 0.001).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the UK Biobank participants

CharacteristicsaTotal (N = 376,346)Females (n = 202,177)Males (n = 174,169)pb
Age (years)57.96 ± 7.9557.75 ± 7.8658.20 ± 8.04<0.001
BMI27.41 ± 4.7527.04 ± 5.1327.84 ± 4.23<0.001
Drinking status<0.001
 Never11,595 (3.08)8,686 (4.30)2,909 (1.67)
 Previous12,834 (3.41)7,229 (3.58)5,605 (3.22)
 Current351,917 (93.51)186,262 (92.13)165,655 (95.11)
Smoking status<0.001
 Never205,541 (54.62)120,125 (59.42)85,416 (49.04)
 Previous132,721 (35.27)64,539 (31.92)68,182 (39.15)
 Current38,084 (10.12)17,513 (8.66)20,571 (11.81)

BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation.

The data were summarized as median ±SD for continuous variables or as numbers (percentage) for categorical variables.

p value were derived from t test for continuous variables, and chi-square test for the categorical variables, when compared the difference between females and males.

Demographic characteristics of the UK Biobank participants BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation. The data were summarized as median ±SD for continuous variables or as numbers (percentage) for categorical variables. p value were derived from t test for continuous variables, and chi-square test for the categorical variables, when compared the difference between females and males.

PheWAS

Within the phenotypic data of the UK Biobank participants, we identified 307,580 hospital episode records, comprising 1,888 unique International Classification of Diseases coding systems (ICD-10) codes. After mapping diagnostic ICD-10 codes to phecodes and filtering out disease outcomes with less than 200 cases, the phenotypic data, consisting of 865 distinct phenotypes classified into 17 disease categories, were summarized. Finally, 601 phecodes (median number of cases = 1,357, ranging from 201 to 83,955) were included in PheWAS analysis (Table 2). A total of 19 pairs of genotype–phenotype associations then passed the significance threshold of 10% false discovery rate (FDR) correction in the total population PheWAS analysis with adjustment for covariates, as seen in Table 3 and Figure S1, including 10 disease groups (myeloproliferative disease, benign neoplasm of other parts of digestive system, gout and other crystal arthropathies, cataract, hypertension, other disorders of stomach and duodenum, miscarriage and stillbirth, arthropathy associated with infections, other arthropathies, and fracture of upper limb) and five disease outcomes (gout, essential hypertension, unspecified monoarthritis, arthropathy NOS, and fracture of radius and ulna). All the results of the PheWAS for each instrument single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are provided in Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6.
Table 2

The number of phenotypes and cases in each disease category

Disease categoriesPhenotypesCases
MinimumMedianMeanMaximum
Circulatory system532221,7926,36583,955
Congenital anomalies10231342378633
Dermatologic342721,1481,9618,506
Digestive622812,6936,46838,518
Endocrine/metabolic342077864,25042,989
Genitourinary622191,8713,84122,046
Hematopoietic152148202,53112,914
Infectious diseases93161,0772,7208,182
Injuries & poisonings372312,6964,17721,178
Mental disorders252117902,82533,250
Musculoskeletal392381,9795,53824,437
Neoplasms642079473,06733,250
Neurological342328322,15913,557
Pregnancy complications272019201,2766,388
Respiratory402011,4834,59936,623
Sense organs452018342,14917,917
Symptoms114186,59310,70748,335

After mapping diagnostic ICD-10 codes to phecodes (the mappings of phecodes are available at http://phewascatalog.org), 865 different phecodes were summarized and 601 phecodes were included in the PheWAS analyses after eliminating disease outcomes with low prevalence (cases <200).

Table 3

Genotype-phenotype associations identified by the PheWAS analyses

SNPsPhenotypesDescriptionsGroupsTotal (n)Cases (n)OR (95% CI)pFDR-qa
Total population

rs4072037_C537Other disorders of stomach and duodenumDigestive349,4648,8010.92 (0.89, 0.95)2.89 × 10−81.65 × 10−5
274Gout and other crystal arthropathiesEndocrine/metabolic376,3464,0161.10 (1.06, 1.15)1.18 × 10−50.002
274.1GoutEndocrine/metabolic376,3464,0161.10 (1.06, 1.15)1.18 × 10−50.002
366CataractSense organs376,34624,5710.96 (0.95, 0.98)8.60 × 10−50.011
634Miscarriage; stillbirthPregnancy complications373,6472,2991.12 (1.06, 1.19)1.13 × 10−40.013
211Benign neoplasm of other parts of digestive systemNeoplasms368,9031,3520.86 (0.80, 0.93)1.56 × 10−40.015
803.2Fracture of radius and ulnaInjuries & poisonings373,6836,5490.94 (0.90, 0.97)2.51 × 10−40.018
803Fracture of upper limbInjuries & poisonings373,6876,5530.94 (0.91, 0.97)2.58 × 10−40.018
200Myeloproliferative diseaseNeoplasms373,2567150.83 (0.75, 0.93)6.61 × 10−40.042
711Arthropathy associated with infectionsMusculoskeletal351,7234241.24 (1.09, 1.42)0.0020.087
rs448378_G401.1Essential hypertensionCirculatory system376,15383,9551.03 (1.02, 1.05)8.86 × 10−92.70 × 10−6
401HypertensionCirculatory system376,34684,1481.03 (1.02, 1.05)9.41 × 10−92.70 × 10−6
rs13146355_G401HypertensionCirculatory system376,34684,1481.03 (1.01, 1.04)8.89 × 10−60.003
401.1Essential hypertensionCirculatory system376,15383,9551.03 (1.01, 1.04)9.35 × 10−60.003
rs3925584_T401.1Essential hypertensionCirculatory system376,15383,9551.03 (1.02, 1.04)7.74 × 10−60.003
401HypertensionCirculatory system376,34684,1481.03 (1.01, 1.04)8.82 × 10−60.003
rs7965584_A716Other arthropathiesMusculoskeletal373,59222,2931.09 (1.04, 1.13)3.90 × 10−50.009
716.9Arthropathy NOSMusculoskeletal373,59222,2931.09 (1.04, 1.13)3.90 × 10−50.009
716.2Unspecified monoarthritisMusculoskeletal373,46622,1671.08 (1.04, 1.13)4.48 × 10−50.009

Males

rs4072037_C274Gout and other crystal arthropathiesEndocrine/metabolic174,1693,4781.11 (1.06, 1.16)1.95 × 10−50.004
274.1GoutEndocrine/metabolic174,1693,4781.11 (1.06, 1.16)1.95 × 10−50.004
rs11144134340MigrainebNeurological171,0507590.72 (0.61, 0.84)4.26 × 10−50.019
594.8Renal colicbGenitourinary170,7751,2770.78 (0.69, 0.89)1.63 × 10−40.036
rs3925584_T401.1Essential hypertensionCirculatory system174,06645,5251.04 (1.02, 1.06)2.30 × 10−60.001
401HypertensionCirculatory system174,16945,6281.04 (1.02, 1.06)2.68 × 10−60.001

Females

rs4072037_C537Other disorders of stomach and duodenumDigestive187,9695,0490.90 (0.87, 0.94)7.36 × 10−73.41 × 10−4
211Benign neoplasm of other parts of digestive systemNeoplasms199,0878270.81 (0.74, 0.90)4.04 × 10−50.009
634Miscarriage; stillbirthPregnancy complications199,4792,2981.12 (1.06, 1.19)1.28 × 10−40.020
803Fracture of upper limbInjuries & poisonings200,6764,8790.93 (0.90, 0.97)0.0010.067
803.2Fracture of radius and ulnaInjuries & poisonings200,6734,8760.93 (0.90, 0.97)0.0010.067
366CataractSense organs202,17713,7380.96 (0.93, 0.98)0.0010.084
rs448378_G401.1Essential hypertensionCirculatory system202,08738,4301.05 (1.03, 1.06)2.51 × 10−76.39 × 10−5
401HypertensionCirculatory system202,17738,5201.05 (1.03, 1.06)2.76 × 10−76.39 × 10−5
rs13146355_G401HypertensionCirculatory system202,17738,5201.03 (1.02, 1.05)1.47 × 10−40.043
401.1Essential hypertensionCirculatory system202,08738,4301.03 (1.02, 1.05)1.88 × 10−40.043
585.3Chronic renal failure [CKD]bGenitourinary199,1052,9890.91 (0.87, 0.96)0.0010.078
593HematuriabGenitourinary199,9506,4791.06 (1.03, 1.10)0.0010.078

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NOS, not otherwise specified; OR, odds ratio; PheWAS, phenome-wide association study.

Notes: The PheWAS analysis was adjusted by age, sex, BMI, assessment center, and the first 15 genetic principal components.

Significance threshold of a lower than 10% false discovery rate after correcting the multiple testing.

When compared with the total population PheWAS analyses, significant pairs of associations were newly identified from the gender-stratified PheWAS analyses.

The number of phenotypes and cases in each disease category After mapping diagnostic ICD-10 codes to phecodes (the mappings of phecodes are available at http://phewascatalog.org), 865 different phecodes were summarized and 601 phecodes were included in the PheWAS analyses after eliminating disease outcomes with low prevalence (cases <200). Genotype-phenotype associations identified by the PheWAS analyses Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NOS, not otherwise specified; OR, odds ratio; PheWAS, phenome-wide association study. Notes: The PheWAS analysis was adjusted by age, sex, BMI, assessment center, and the first 15 genetic principal components. Significance threshold of a lower than 10% false discovery rate after correcting the multiple testing. When compared with the total population PheWAS analyses, significant pairs of associations were newly identified from the gender-stratified PheWAS analyses. Further, we used the weighted genetic risk score (GRS) of serum magnesium levels to conduct the same PheWAS analysis. A total of 12 pairs of genotype–phenotype associations passed the significance threshold of 10% FDR correction in the total population PheWAS analysis with adjustment for covariates, as seen in Table 4 and Figure S2, including six diseases groups (fracture of upper limb, cataract, myeloproliferative disease, gout and other crystal arthropathies, degenerative skin conditions and other dermatoses, and other disorders of stomach and duodenum) and six disease outcomes (fracture of radius and ulna, inguinal hernia, polycythemia vera, gout, malignant neoplasm of female breast, and seborrheic keratosis).
Table 4

The results of the PheWAS analyses for magnesium-GRS in the total population

PhenotypesDescriptionsGroupsTotal (n)Cases (n)Or (95% CI)pFDR-qa
803.2Fracture of radius and ulnaInjuries & poisonings373,6836,549127.87 (12.85, 1,272.43)3.5 × 10−40.011
803Fracture of upper limbInjuries & poisonings373,6876,553124.84 (12.55, 1,241.51)3.81 × 10−50.011
550.1Inguinal herniaDigestive342,59416,5750.06 (0.01, 0.28)2.52 × 10−40.033
366CataractSense organs376,34624,5719.61 (2.76, 33.44)3.73 × 10−40.033
200Myeloproliferative diseaseNeoplasms373,2567152.64 × 105 (271.59, 2.51 × 108)3.76 × 10−40.033
200.1Polycythemia veraNeoplasms369,5753951.47 × 107 (1.43 × 103, 1.52 × 1011)4.65 × 10−40.033
274Gout and other crystal arthropathiesEndocrine/metabolic376,3464,0160.01 (0.00, 0.10)4.65 × 10−40.033
274.1GoutEndocrine/metabolic376,3464,0160.01 (0.00, 0.10)4.65 × 10−40.033
174.11Malignant neoplasm of female breastNeoplasms368,61910,42921.57 (3.45, 134.83)1.02 × 10−30.065
702.2Seborrheic keratosisDermatologic376,3463,356187.86 (7.69, 4,588.89)1.32 × 10−30.070
702Degenerative skin conditions and other dermatosesDermatologic371,6733,356187.23 (7.66, 4,577.17)1.34 × 10−30.070
537Other disorders of stomach and duodenumDigestive349,4648,80123.19 (3.15, 170.66)2.02 × 10−30.097

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FDR, false discovery rate; GRS, genetic risk score; NOS, not otherwise specified; OR, odds ratio; PheWAS, phenome-wide association study.

Notes: The PheWAS analysis was adjusted by age, sex, BMI, assessment center, and the first 15 genetic principal components.

Significance threshold of a lower than 10% false discovery rate after correcting the multiple testing.

The results of the PheWAS analyses for magnesium-GRS in the total population Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FDR, false discovery rate; GRS, genetic risk score; NOS, not otherwise specified; OR, odds ratio; PheWAS, phenome-wide association study. Notes: The PheWAS analysis was adjusted by age, sex, BMI, assessment center, and the first 15 genetic principal components. Significance threshold of a lower than 10% false discovery rate after correcting the multiple testing. The gender-stratified PheWAS analysis identified 6 pairs of genotype–phenotype association in males and 12 pairs of genotype–phenotype association in females (Table 3). When compared with the total population PheWAS analysis, four new pairs of association (migraine and renal colic in males, chronic renal failure and hematuria in females) were identified from the gender-stratified PheWAS analysis.

MR

We then conducted MR analysis using three methods (inverse-variance weighted [IVW], weighted median, and MR egger) to test whether magnesium levels were causally associated with the 20 disease groups/outcomes identified from PheWAS analysis using SNPs and GRS. At least one of three methods suggested a potential causal association of serum magnesium levels for 11 out of 20 disease outcomes (Table 5), including five disease groups: myeloproliferative disease (ORIVW = 3.49 × 105, 95% CI: 24.92, 4.88 × 109; ORweighted median = 3.89 × 106, 95% CI: 194.28, 7.81 × 1010), gout and other crystal arthropathies (ORweighted median = 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06), cataract (ORIVW = 9.24, 95% CI: 1.53, 55.61; ORweighted median = 24.93, 95% CI: 4.55, 136.63), degenerative skin conditions and other dermatoses (ORIVW = 185.81, 95% CI: 1.81, 19,081.09; ORweighted median = 179.93, 95% CI: 2.93, 11,038.98), and fracture of upper limb (ORIVW = 106.57, 95% CI: 10.67, 1,064.37; ORweighted median = 69.45, 95% CI: 9.00, 1,209.85); and six disease outcomes: malignant neoplasm of female breast (ORIVW = 16.39, 95% CI: 2.52, 106.34; ORweighted median = 19.96, 95% CI: 2.01, 198.35), polycythemia vera (ORIVW = 1.64 × 107, 95% CI: 1,388.27, 1.94 × 1011; ORweighted median = 1.76 × 107, 95% CI: 81.73, 3.78 × 1012), gout (ORweighted median = 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.06), inguinal hernia (ORIVW = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.00; ORweighted median = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.83), seborrheic keratosis (ORIVW = 187.69, 95% CI: 1.81, 19,450.49; ORweighted median = 180.37, 95% CI: 3.32, 9,788.32), and fracture of radius and ulna (ORIVW = 109.18, 95% CI: 10.92, 1,091.13; ORweighted median = 70.86, 95% CI: 3.68, 1,365.13).
Table 5

The results of two-sample MR analyses

PhenotypesDescriptionsIVW
Weighted median
MR Egger
OR (95% CI)pPheterogeneityOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)pPpleiotropy
Total population

174.11Malignant neoplasm of female breast16.39 (2.52, 106.34)0.0030.40919.96 (2.01, 198.35)0.011104.92 (0.35, 31,628.18)0.1850.534
200Myeloproliferative disease3.49 × 105 (24.92, 4.88 × 109)0.0090.0983.89 × 106 (194.28, 7.81 × 1010)0.003768.00 (0.00, 8.94 × 1015)0.6870.693
200.1Polycythemia vera1.64 × 107 (1.39 × 103, 1.94 × 1011)<0.0010.5031.76 × 107 (81.73, 3.78 × 1012)0.00898.54 (0.00, 4.76 × 1013)0.7550.403
274Gout and other crystal arthropathies0.01 (0.00, 7.69)0.162<0.0010.00 (0.00, 0.06)0.0020.00 (0.00, 5.37 × 106)0.5610.844
274.1Gout0.01 (0.00, 7.69)0.162<0.0010.00 (0.00, 0.06)0.0020.00 (0.00, 5.37 × 106)0.5610.844
366Cataract9.24 (1.53, 55.61)0.0150.06524.93 (4.55, 136.63)<0.001291.00 (3.12, 27,124.93)0.0700.187
550.1Inguinal hernia0.09 (0.01, 1.00)0.0490.0230.10 (0.01, 0.83)0.0331.11 (0.00, 1890.45)0.9790.512
702Degenerative skin conditions and other dermatoses185.81 (1.81, 19,081.09)0.0270.062179.93 (2.93, 11,038.98)0.0131.86 (0.00, 2.54 × 106)0.9350.533
702.2Seborrheic keratosis187.69 (1.81, 19,450.49)0.0270.061180.37 (3.32, 9,788.32)0.0111.85 (0.00, 2.59 × 106)0.9360.533
803Fracture of upper limb106.57 (10.67, 1,064.37)<0.0010.73869.45 (3.99, 1,209.85)0.0046,846.11 (9.00, 5.21 × 106)0.0590.260
803.2Fracture of radius and ulna109.18 (10.92, 1,091.13)<0.0010.73170.86 (3.68, 1,365.13)0.0057,279.51 (9.56, 5.54 × 106)0.0580.256

Males

274Gout and other crystal arthropathies0.01 (1.53 × 10−6, 17.02)0.2025.49 × 10−60.00 (2.25 × 106, 0.03)0.0015.37 × 10−4 (2.61 × 10−15, 1.11 × 108)0.6010.866
274.1Gout0.01 (1.53 × 10−6, 17.02)0.2025.49 × 10−60.00 (1.92 × 106, 0.04)0.0015.37 × 10−4 (2.61 × 10−15, 1.11 × 108)0.6010.866
340Migraine299.76 (5.42 × 10−4, 1.66 × 108)0.3980.00122.04 (0.00, 1.82 × 105)0.5021.89 × 109 (1.77 × 10−8, 2.02 × 1026)0.3460.451
401Hypertension3.26 (0.16, 66.61)0.4432.40 × 10−74.07 (0.89, 18.60)0.0702.96 × 102 (0.06, 1.49 × 106)0.2610.331
401.1Essential hypertension3.27 (0.16, 68.13)0.4451.93 × 10−74.49 (1.09, 18.51)0.0383.06 × 102 (0.06, 1.63 × 106)0.2610.331
594.8Renal colica1,379.50 (0.14, 1.34 × 107)0.1230.0062,388.81 (1.97, 2.90 × 106)0.0321.64 × 1014 (7.08 × 107, 3.81 × 1020)0.0120.022

Females

211Benign neoplasm of other parts of digestive system93.39 (1.70 × 10−4, 5.14 × 107)0.5010.0011.24 (6.80 × 10−6, 2.27 × 105)0.9722.81 × 1012 (0.00, 3.39 × 1027)0.1810.221
366Cataract11.03 (0.89, 1.36 × 102)0.0610.04731.99 (3.44, 2.97 × 102)0.0027.59 × 102 (0.84, 6.89 × 105)0.1290.264
401Hypertension0.46 (0.02, 13.67)0.6528.25 × 10−92.64 (0.65, 10.73)0.1741.97 × 103 (2.61, 1.49 × 106)0.0880.058
401.1Essential hypertension0.46 (0.02, 13.67)0.6518.54 × 10−92.63 (0.65, 10.60)0.1741.93 × 103 (2.47, 1.51 × 106)0.0900.059
537Other disorders of stomach and duodenum96.95 (0.67, 1.40 × 104)0.0710.003127.65 (1.56, 1.04 × 104)0.0317.71 × 106 (1.44 × 1020, 4.13 × 1011)0.0460.096
585.3Chronic renal failure (CKD)16.55 (0.03, 1.04 × 104)0.3930.0030.14 (0.00, 16.54)0.4226.29 × 10−4 (1.09 × 10−11, 3.62 × 104)0.4640.300
593Hematuria0.57 (0.01, 22.45)0.7620.0292.60 (0.15, 45.37)0.5133.02 × 102 (0.02, 6.00 × 106)0.3210.256
634Miscarriage; stillbirth3.00 × 10−3 (1.06 × 10−5, 0.96)0.0490.0672.62 × 10−4 (8.25 × 10−7, 0.08)0.0056.53 × 10−7 (6.32 × 10−14, 6.75)0.1590.333
803Fracture of upper limb205.22 (14.14, 2.98 × 103)<0.0010.552367.00 (11.56, 1.17 × 104)0.0013.16 × 104 (14.19, 7.03 × 107)0.0580.244
803.2Fracture of radius and ulna205.22 (14.14, 2.98 × 103)<0.0010.535421.34 (15.69, 1.17 × 104)3.19 × 10−43.29 × 104 (14.77, 7.34 × 107)0.0570.241

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; PheWAS, phenome-wide association study.

When compared with the total population MR analyses, significant pairs of associations were newly identified from the gender-stratified MR analyses.

The results of two-sample MR analyses Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; PheWAS, phenome-wide association study. When compared with the total population MR analyses, significant pairs of associations were newly identified from the gender-stratified MR analyses. The gender-stratified analysis indicated differences in MR estimated effects between males and females with the exceptions of hypertension and essential hypertension (Table 5). For males, magnesium levels were associated with one disease group: gout and other crystal arthropathies (Pweighted median < 0.001); and three disease outcomes: gout (Pweighted median = 0.001), essential hypertension (Pweighted median = 0.038), and renal colic (Pweighted median = 0.032, PEgger = 0.012). Meanwhile, in females, there were significant associations with four disease groups: cataract (Pweighted median = 0.002), other disorders of stomach and duodenum (Pweighted median = 0.031, PEgger = 0.046), miscarriage and stillbirth (PIVW = 0.049, Pweighted median = 0.005), and fracture of upper limb (PIVW < 0.001, Pweighted median = 0.001); and one disease outcome: fracture of radius and ulna (PIVW < 0.001, Pweighted median < 0.001).

Pleiotropy and sensitivity analyses

We undertook the MR weighted median analysis and MR Egger analysis to correct for possible pleiotropic effects of multiple instruments (Table 5). After balancing pleiotropic effects in the MR weighted median analysis, all the results were consistent with the IVW analysis of total population. However, using the MR Egger analysis, none of the results were considered to be causally associated with higher serum magnesium levels without pleiotropic effects (all Ppleiotropy > 0.05).

The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network

We selected 15 serum magnesium-associated genes (including the instrumental variable [IV] SNPs located genes and the top ten associated genes) to construct the PPI network. However, for 11 disease outcomes identified by MR analysis, only the top ten cataract-associated genes were found in the GeneCards website (Table 6). The PPI network demonstrated an interaction between the serum magnesium-associated gene DCDC1 and the cataract-associated gene PAX6 (Figure 1).
Table 6

The serum magnesium-associated and cataract-associated genes included in the PPI network diagram

TraitsSerum magnesium-associated genesRelevance scoresDiseaseDisease-associated genescRelevance scores
Serum magnesium (GeneCards)aCNNM230.49CataractCRYAA/HSPB4111.9
TRPM627.16GJA890.66
CLDN1619.35GJA381.45
PTH9.39EPHA275.87
PCBD19.39CRYGD75.42
TRPM79.39OPA374.75
CLDN199.39CRYBB273.39
PEX18.13FTL72.61
SBDS8.13CRYBB172.55
PEX268.13PAX669.94
Serum magnesium (IV)bTRPM627.16
MUC12.89
MECOM2.12
SHROOM32.12
ATP2B12.12
DCDC5/DCDC12.12

Abbreviations: IV, instrumental variable; PPI, protein-protein interaction.

The top ten serum magnesium-associated genes were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/).

The serum magnesium-associated SNPs (using as IV in the MR-PheWAS analyses) located genes.

The top ten cataract-associated genes were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/).

Figure 1

Diagram of the interactions between the serum magnesium-associated genes and the cataract-associated genes

Mga: the top ten associated genes of serum magnesium were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/). Mgb: the instrumental variable SNPs located genes of serum magnesium. Mgc: the gene is the top ten genes as well as the instrumental variable SNPs located genes of serum magnesium. All confidence scores range from 0.4 to 1, while one is the highest. The darker the green line with the arrow, the higher the confidence score, indicating a stronger interaction between the two genes.

The serum magnesium-associated and cataract-associated genes included in the PPI network diagram Abbreviations: IV, instrumental variable; PPI, protein-protein interaction. The top ten serum magnesium-associated genes were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/). The serum magnesium-associated SNPs (using as IV in the MR-PheWAS analyses) located genes. The top ten cataract-associated genes were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/). Diagram of the interactions between the serum magnesium-associated genes and the cataract-associated genes Mga: the top ten associated genes of serum magnesium were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/). Mgb: the instrumental variable SNPs located genes of serum magnesium. Mgc: the gene is the top ten genes as well as the instrumental variable SNPs located genes of serum magnesium. All confidence scores range from 0.4 to 1, while one is the highest. The darker the green line with the arrow, the higher the confidence score, indicating a stronger interaction between the two genes.

Discussion

This is the first MR-PheWAS investigating the totality of health effects associated with serum magnesium levels. We found evidence of a detrimental effect of higher magnesium status on risk of malignant neoplasm of female breast, myeloproliferative disease, polycythemia vera, cataract, degenerative skin conditions and other dermatoses, seborrheic keratosis, and fracture of upper limb (fracture of radius and ulna). Contrarily, our MR-PheWAS provided with evidences of a protective effect of higher magnesium status on risk of gout and other crystal arthropathies (gout) as well as inguinal hernia. In addition, our study indicates gender-specific effects of nine disease groups/outcomes in MR estimated effects. Consistent with our findings for malignant neoplasm of female breast, an MR study using the data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium suggested that magnesium is positively associated with breast cancer risk (Papadimitriou et al., 2021). In contrast, a cohort study reported no significant difference between magnesium consumption and breast cancer risk (Li et al., 2011). Previous studies have shown that increased concentrations of magnesium in breast cancer cells is capable of promoting tumor progression by regulating enzymes associated with energy generation, which was required for cell adhesion and cancer metastasis (Mendes et al., 2018). Animal studies have suggested that magnesium is protective in the early stages of chemical carcinogenesis, while also promoting tumor growth (Castiglioni and Maier, 2011). Our findings should be further evaluated in observational and interventional designs. There is a lot of evidence suggesting that magnesium is good for bone health; however, the vast majority of research has investigated dietary magnesium as an exposure rather than investigating serum magnesium (Kunutsor et al., 2017). Even though high dietary magnesium intake is associated with higher bone mineral density (Ryder et al., 2005), the conclusion for a benefit in fracture risk remains controversial. A meta-analysis suggested that high dietary magnesium intake does not reduce the fracture risk (Farsinejad-Marj et al., 2016). Consistent with our results, the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study showed that magnesium intake exceeding the recommended dietary allowance is linked with an increased risk of forearm and wrist fractures (Orchard et al., 2014). Moreover, because magnesium has anti-calcification properties, excess magnesium accumulation in the bone might be harmful (Cunningham et al., 2012). Whether the association of serum magnesium levels and risk of fracture reflects a real correlation needs to be further confirmed. Most observational epidemiological studies of magnesium dietary intake have been limited by misclassification bias because of the fact that foods containing magnesium are often rich in calcium and potassium, which interact with other trace elements to keep bone health and, hence, make it difficult to assess the individual effect of each nutrient. In addition, many factors have been shown to play significant roles in bone health, such as gender, aging, exercise, hormones, and heritability (Martini, 1999). Magnesium, presented mainly in cornea, lens, retina, vitreous body, and anterior chamber in the eyes, is essential for the lens to maintain integrity of its structure and normal function (Agarwal et al., 2012; Li et al., 2018a). A high level of Mg2+ exists in photoreceptors in the lens, even in the axial regions (Kirkpatrick, 1920). The consequences of imbalance in magnesium homeostasis may influence the cellular and molecular functions and may form the basis of some pathological conditions. Magnesium has been reported to enhance oxidative stress in the lens by increasing the production of free radicals and depleting antioxidant defenses (Agarwal et al., 2013). Moreover, since ATPase function appears to be essential to the lens, the role of magnesium in Na+-K+-ATPase and Ca2+-ATPase activities may be important for ion transport in the lens (Agarwal et al., 2013). Notably, animal studies have shown that administration of deep-sea water, containing 200 mg/L of magnesium, can delay the development of cataracts in cataract-prone rats, although this cataract development did not improve with further increases in the magnesium levels (Shumiya, 1995). It is speculated that high levels of magnesium might have detrimental effects on the lens. Although the mechanisms involved in magnesium homeostasis and the role of magnesium deficiency in the pathogenesis of cataracts needs to be further explored, our findings via the PPI network may support this possibility. The PPI network demonstrated an interaction between the serum magnesium-associated gene DCDC1 and the cataract-associated gene PAX6, which are both involved in the regulation of cell division. Mutations in PAX6 gene, known genetic alterations causing varieties of autosomal-dominant ocular malformations, can lead to aniridia as the major clinical signs (Lima Cunha et al., 2019; Nieves-Moreno et al., 2021). Researchers have found that the 566 kb hemizygous deletion of chromosome 11p13 downstream of PAX6 gene should be the cause of the familial aniridia (Cheng et al., 2011). In addition, the prior studies have also shown that 11p13 interstitial deletion (including DCDC1 gene) can affect the downstream transcription of PAX6, whereas this effect would result in the occurrences of aniridia and eye deformities (Balay et al., 2016). Some studies have found positive links between magnesium and a reduced risk of knee osteoarthritis (Qin et al., 2012; Veronese et al., 2017). Magnesium supplementation in elderly patients may reduce the risk of knee osteoarthritis. Magnesium supplementation may also improve the symptoms and progression of knee osteoarthritis (Wu et al., 2019). Although there has been no traditional epidemiological study of the relationship between magnesium and gout, a MR study suggested a positive link with the risk of gout (Cheng et al., 2019). The mechanism underlying these relationships needs to be further studied. Although no epidemiological studies concerning the associations between magnesium and myeloproliferative disease, inguinal hernia, or seborrheic keratosis have been reported, our study provides some suggestive evidence. Further research on these diseases will be well worth exploring; independent cohort studies and functional studies are warranted to verify these relatively novel associations. No previous observational studies have reported gender difference in the association between magnesium levels and the development of the above diseases, nor have any studies addressed these sex differences using an MR approach to negate the influence of environmental confounders. Our study identified a few diseases, including cataract, fracture of upper limb, and other disorders of stomach and duodenum, that are potentially causally associated with genetic variations of magnesium levels only in females, whereas renal colic and gout and other crystal arthropathies were seen to be associated with magnesium only in males. The biological mechanism(s) by which magnesium levels are linked to certain diseases do not seem to be consistent between males and females and remain to be further studied. A prior study utilized the MR method to examine the association of genetically magnesium with the risk of 9 chronic diseases, consisting of type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia (Cheng et al., 2019). However, the present study conducted a hypothesis-free investigation of the causal effects of magnesium levels more broadly across the human phenome, thus contributing to the discovery of new relations. Using SNPs that are strongly associated with blood magnesium levels as instrument variants that are randomly assorted at conception; we tested the cumulative lifetime effects of genetically determined variation across more than 700 disease outcomes. One of the main challenges to the MR method is deciphering which effects are attributable to bias owing to pleiotropic SNPs; we utilized the weighted median and Egger methods to solve this problem (Bowden et al., 2016). Recognizing and understanding the basic pathophysiological mechanisms of disease occurrence and development is of great significance for formulating future pharmacological strategies. In addition, magnesium supplementation may have therapeutic value in preventing the occurrence and progression of diseases associated with magnesium deficiency, whereas reducing magnesium status may have therapeutic value in preventing diseases associated with excessive magnesium. Notably, our findings of interaction between the serum magnesium-associated gene DCDC1 and the cataract-associated gene PAX6 may provide new targets for promoting the treatments of cataracts using magnesium intervention.

Limitations of the study

This study also has limitations. First, we used Hospital Exchange-information System data, which provided a rich source of clinical outcomes that were related to genetic data of UK Biobank participants, but may also introduce misclassification bias (Padmanabhan et al., 2019). Second, insufficient statistical power may also lead to false negative results in our study. The previously reported effects of serum magnesium on risk of bipolar disorder and coronary artery disease risk by MR were not statistically significant in our analyses after adjusting for multiple testing (Cheng et al., 2019; Larsson et al., 2018). Using the interim release data of UK Biobank and focusing on a very homogeneous population (Caucasian based on genetic information) limited the power of our study. Moreover, to avoid information bias, we did not analyze the self-reported data from UK Biobank, although this may influence the comprehensiveness of PheWAS and decrease the precision of MR estimates. Last, because the MR estimates correlate with slight change in serum magnesium in the normal range rather than at extremes of magnesium deficiency or excess, caution must be taken when extrapolating the findings of MR. Overall, our MR-PheWAS study supports a causal effect of serum magnesium on several clinically relevant disease outcomes, including: neoplasms; endocrine/metabolic, sensory organ, circulatory system, digestive and musculoskeletal diseases; pregnancy complications; injuries; and poisonings. Considering that serum magnesium is modifiable, exploring whether regulation of serum levels can be used to optimize health outcomes seems beneficial.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Prof. Xiaobo Yang (yangx@gxmu.edu.cn).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Experimental model and subject details

Our study was restricted to participants of Caucasian descent from UK Biobank (Sudlow et al., 2015), a prospective cohort with a total of 502,505 participants aged 40-69 years and recruited from 22 assessment centers throughout the UK between 2006 and 2010 at baseline, while relatives with a kinship coefficient of > 0.0884 were randomly excluded. Finally, a total of 376,346 participants consisted of 202,177 females (53.72%) and 174,169 males (46.28%) were enrolled in the analyses. UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (IRAS project ID: 299116), which covers the UK. The informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Additionally, this study has approval from the UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Council (Approval No. 56902).

Method details

Genetic instruments for magnesium

We selected six magnesium-associated SNPs as genetic instruments, which was based on a genome-wide association study (GWAS) performed by the International Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Alliance on 23,829 European subjects (combined Discovery [N = 15,366] and Replication [N = 8,463] cohorts) (Guo et al., 2020; Meyer et al., 2010). The six identified SNPs comprised: rs4072037 in Mucin1 (MUC1) gene, rs7965584 near ATPase plasma membrane Ca2+ transporting 1 (ATP2B1) gene, rs3925584 near the doublecortin domain containing 5 (DCDC5) gene, rs11144134 in transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 6 (TRPM6) gene, rs13146355 in shroom family member 3 (SHROOM3) gene, and rs448378 in MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus (MECOM) gene. All SNPs were at a genome-wide significance level (p < 5 × 10−8). All six of these SNPs have previously been shown to be strong instruments for MR analysis as measured by F-statistics > 10 (Guo et al., 2020) and collectively explain approximately 1.62% of the variation in serum magnesium levels (Table S7). We used six serum magnesium-associated SNPs to construct a weighted GRS as a proxy for serum magnesium levels.

PheWAS

We used the WHO’s ICD-10 to define the case and control groups. Both incident and prevalent cases were included, but not self-reported diagnoses. We focused on phenotypic data sets of inpatient hospital episode records in the UK Biobank. In PheWAS analysis, we individually used six magnesium-associated SNPs to scan across a wide range of disease outcomes defined by the phecode system (Denny et al., 2013). Additionally, we performed the same PheWAS using serum magnesium-associated GRS. The case groups were identified as individuals having at least one documented event, while the control groups were those without any record of this outcome or its related phecodes (Li et al., 2018b). Next, a series of case-control tests were performed for each phecode, and logistic regression analysis was generated for each instrument SNP separately across all phecodes, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, assessment center, and the first 15 genetic principal components. To ensure statistical power, the PheWAS analysis was only performed for phecode with 200 or more cases, which was suggested based on a simulation of power estimates for PheWAS analysis (Verma et al., 2018). We used the threshold of lower than 10% FDR to account for multiple testing, when the p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (Zhu et al., 2011).

MR

To explore if there were any causal effects on disease outcomes identified in the PheWAS analysis, IVW meta-analysis of MR estimates for all six instrument SNPs was performed to derive the overall MR estimate for the effect of magnesium on the risk of each considered outcome (Burgess et al., 2015; Palmer et al., 2012).

Pleiotropy and sensitivity analyses

We used the Ensembl database (http://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Info/Index) to search for secondary phenotypes associated with each magnesium-associated SNP (Howe et al., 2021), and to exclude possible pleiotropic effects by manually removing these SNPs from the MR analyses (Table S7). Additionally, the MR- Egger method, which allows the intercept to be freely estimated as an indicator of average pleiotropic bias, was performed to correct for any potential pleiotropic effects in the causal estimates (Bowden et al., 2015; Burgess and Thompson, 2017). We also conducted the weighted median to further ensure the robust exclusion of pleiotropic instruments (Bowden et al., 2016). The Cochran’s Q statistic was then applied to evaluate heterogeneity in IVW estimates (Burgess et al., 2017; Egger et al., 1997; Huang et al., 2019). Moreover, to account for any difference between male and female gender, we performed PheWAS and MR analyses by gender stratification.

The PPI network

To explore the interactions between serum magnesium-associated genes and disease-associated genes, we used STRING (https://string-db.org/) and Cytoscape (https://cytoscape.org/) to construct a PPI network (Otasek et al., 2019; Shannon et al., 2003; Szklarczyk et al., 2021), using the IV SNPs located genes and the top ten associated genes of serum magnesium and disease outcomes. The top ten associated genes of serum magnesium and disease outcomes were searched for using the GeneCards website (https://www.genecards.org/) (Stelzer et al., 2016).

Quantification and statistical analysis

When compared the difference between females and males, t-test was used for continuous variables, and chi-square test for the categorical variables in Table 1. Regarding the MR-PheWAS analyses to estimate the causal effects of serum magnesium levels on multiple disease outcomes, we used R software by PheWAS package (https://github.com/PheWAS/PheWAS) and TwoSampleMR package (https://mrcieu.github.io/TwoSampleMR/articles/exposure.html) in Tables 3, 4, and 5, Figures S1 and S2, and Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6.

Additional resources

This study was based on data obtained from a prospective cohort study: UK Biobank, an open access database to any bona fide researcher who wishes to use it to conduct health-related research for the benefit of the public, after being approved from the UK Biobank Ethics and Governance Council (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/). At baseline, a total of 502,505 participants aged 40–69 years were recruited from 22 assessment centers throughout the UK between 2006 and 2010 (Sudlow et al., 2015). The cohort provided a wide range of self-reported baseline information, including data of health, lifestyle, diseases outcome and genome-wide genotyping (Bycroft et al., 2018).
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Software and algorithms

R softwareThe R Core Teamhttps://www.r-project.org/
PheWAS packageDenny et al., 2013;https://github.com/PheWAS/PheWAS
TwoSampleMR packageBurgess et al., 2015; Burgess et al., 2017; Palmer et al., 2012https://mrcieu.github.io/TwoSampleMR/articles/exposure.html
CytoscapeShannon et al., 2003; Otasek et al., 2019https://cytoscape.org/

Other

Ensembl databaseHowe et al., 2021http://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Info/Index
STRINGSzklarczyk et al., 2021https://string-db.org/
GeneCardsStelzer et al., 2016https://www.genecards.org/
  63 in total

Review 1.  Magnesium deficiency: does it have a role to play in cataractogenesis?

Authors:  Renu Agarwal; Igor Iezhitsa; Puneet Agarwal; Alexander Spasov
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 3.467

2.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks.

Authors:  Paul Shannon; Andrew Markiel; Owen Ozier; Nitin S Baliga; Jonathan T Wang; Daniel Ramage; Nada Amin; Benno Schwikowski; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Magnesium may mediate the favorable impact of whole grains on insulin sensitivity by acting as a mild calcium antagonist.

Authors:  Mark F McCarty
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 4.  The effects of magnesium supplementation on exercise performance.

Authors:  I J Newhouse; E W Finstad
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.638

5.  Children Diagnosed with Auditory Processing Disorder and Their Parents: A Qualitative Study about Perceptions of Living with APD.

Authors:  Sarah Lawton; Suzanne C Purdy; Rose Thomas Kalathottukaren
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 6.  Mechanisms of cataractogenesis in the presence of magnesium deficiency.

Authors:  Renu Agarwal; Igor N Iezhitsa; Puneet Agarwal; Alexander A Spasov
Journal:  Magnes Res       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.115

7.  The association between serum iron status and risk of asthma: a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study in descendants of Europeans.

Authors:  Lulu Huang; Longman Li; Xiaoyu Luo; Sifang Huang; Qingzhi Hou; Xiaoting Ge; Yingnan Lv; Zengnan Mo; Xiaobo Yang
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Lisa Bastarache; Marylyn D Ritchie; Robert J Carroll; Raquel Zink; Jonathan D Mosley; Julie R Field; Jill M Pulley; Andrea H Ramirez; Erica Bowton; Melissa A Basford; David S Carrell; Peggy L Peissig; Abel N Kho; Jennifer A Pacheco; Luke V Rasmussen; David R Crosslin; Paul K Crane; Jyotishman Pathak; Suzette J Bielinski; Sarah A Pendergrass; Hua Xu; Lucia A Hindorff; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Christopher G Chute; Rex L Chisholm; Eric B Larson; Gail P Jarvik; Murray H Brilliant; Catherine A McCarty; Iftikhar J Kullo; Jonathan L Haines; Dana C Crawford; Daniel R Masys; Dan M Roden
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Approach to record linkage of primary care data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink to other health-related patient data: overview and implications.

Authors:  Shivani Padmanabhan; Lucy Carty; Ellen Cameron; Rebecca E Ghosh; Rachael Williams; Helen Strongman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  The relationship between magnesium and osteoarthritis of knee: A MOOSE guided systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Juguang Yang; Jiangtao Liu; Kai Lian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  An Overview of Methods and Exemplars of the Use of Mendelian Randomisation in Nutritional Research.

Authors:  Derrick A Bennett; Huaidong Du
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.706

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.