| Literature DB >> 34703272 |
Jie Deng1, Lorne M Golub2, Hsi-Ming Lee2, Veena Raja2, Francis Johnson3, Allan Kucine4, Wonsae Lee5, Tian-Min Xu1, Ying Gu6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Clinically, it is challenging to manage diabetic patients with periodontitis. Biochemically, both involve a wide range of inflammatory/collagenolytic conditions which exacerbate each other in a "bi-directional manner." However, standard treatments for this type of periodontitis rely on reducing the bacterial burden and less on controlling hyper-inflammation/excessive-collagenolysis. Thus, there is a crucial need for new therapeutic strategies to modulate this excessive host response and to promote enhanced resolution of inflammation. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the impact of a novel chemically-modified curcumin 2.24 (CMC2.24) on host inflammatory response in diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: host-modulatory therapy; hyperglycemia; inflammation; matrix metalloproteinases; periodontitis; resolvins
Year: 2021 PMID: 34703272 PMCID: PMC8528548 DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S330157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Inflamm Res ISSN: 1178-7031
Figure 1Effects of in vivo CMC2.24 treatment on peritoneal macrophage (Mφ) cell function and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the elicited and non-elicited models of diabetic rat. (A) Cell accumulation was measured by counting of Mφs cell numbers. Each column represents 104 cells. (B) Chemotactic activity was measured by Mφs cell migration (fluorocount). (C–E) IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α levels in the thioglycolate-elicited Mφs conditioned media (pg/mL). (F) IL-1β levels in the resident non-elicited Mφs conditioned medium (pg/mL). Each value represents Mean (n=6/group) ± Standard Error (S.E.M.). *p < 0.05, values were compared between groups at the same time period.
Figure 2Effects of in vivo CMC2.24 treatment on MMPs and Resolvin D1 in the elicited and non-elicited models of diabetic rat. (A) MMP-9 activities were analyzed by gelatin zymography and scanned by densitometer, and pro-MMP-9 levels were quantified by image J in the thioglycolate-elicited Mφs conditioned media. (B) MMP-9 activities were analyzed by gelatin zymography, scanned by densitometer, and quantified by image J in the elicited cell-free peritoneal fractions (CFPFs). (C) The pro-, active-, and total-MMP-9 activities were analyzed by gelatin zymography, scanned by densitometer, and quantified by image J in the non-elicited peritoneal CFPFs. (D) MMP-2 activities were analyzed by gelatin zymography and scanned by densitometer, and pro-MMP-2 levels were quantified by image J in the non-elicited peritoneal CFPFs. (E) RvD1 levels (pg/mL) in thioglycolate-elicited Mφ conditioned medium. (F) RvD1 levels (pg/mL) in non-elicited resident Mφ conditioned medium. Each value represents Mean (n=6/group) ± Standard Error (S.E.M.). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001, values were compared between groups at the same time period.
Figure 3Morphometric analyses of diabetes-induced periodontal alveolar bone loss and osteoporosis measured by μCT in rat with 4-day thioglycolation. (A) White “markers” (flat-end line, “Ι”) indicates the distance from CEJ to ABC at the sites between the distal side of the 1st molar and the mesial side of the 2nd molar, bucco-palatally, representing alveolar bone loss. (B) Mean of distance (mm) of CEJ-ABC at the distal side of the 1st maxillary molar on both buccal and palatal view. (C) Mean of distance (mm) of CEJ-ABC at both the distal side of the 1st molar and the mesial side of the 2nd molar buccal-palatally. (D) Morphometric analyses of diabetes-induced osteoporosis measured by μCT in rat with 4-day thioglycolation. The total volume of interest (VOI) area indicates in the white box. And the bone volume of interest area indicates in the red box. (E) The analysis of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) by μCT. (F) The analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) by μCT based on calculating the units of hydroxyapatite density (mg HA/cm3). (G) The levels of blood glucose (mg/dL) in normal/control (non-diabetic), untreated diabetic and the CMC2.24-treated diabetic rats, respectively. (H) The levels of HbA1c (%) in normal/control (non-diabetic), untreated diabetic and the CMC2.24-treated diabetic rats, respectively. Each value represents Mean (n=6/group) ± Standard Error (S.E.M.). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005, values were compared between groups at the same time period.