| Literature DB >> 34703213 |
Yinhua Wang1, Zhaoling Zou1, Amit Jaisi2, Opeyemi Joshua Olatunji3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past few decades, cyclophosphamide (CP) has been extensively used as a broad-spectrum alkylating agent for the treatment of various cancers and solid tumors. However, the therapeutic actions on CP are not limited to only cancer cells, as it simultaneously exerts significant toxicities on healthy cells through the instigation of oxidative stress and oxidative damages. CP induced testicular toxicity is associated with impaired spermatogenesis, reduced sperm functionality, reproductive hormone and testicular weight. This study was aimed at unravelling the protective effects of emodin (EMD) on testicular toxicity following CP treatment.Entities:
Keywords: cyclophosphamide; emodin; inflammation; oxidative stress; testicular toxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34703213 PMCID: PMC8541740 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S333383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Figure 1Study design diagram indicating the treatment protocol for evaluating the effect of emodin on cyclophosphamide-induced testicular toxicity.
Effect of EMD on the Markers of Testicular Function in CP Treated Rats
| Parameters/Groups | NCG | CPPG | EMD25+CP | EMD50+CP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testes weight (g) | 3.55 ± 0.13 | 2.30 ± 0.12† | 3.50 ± 0.07** | 3.36 ± 0.29** |
| Epididymis weight (g) | 1.51 ± 0.11 | 1.01 ± 0.09† | 1.31 ± 0.11** | 1.37 ± 0.11** |
| Sperm count (x106) | 70.11 ± 3.66 | 38.03 ± 6.34† | 57.05 ± 5.60** | 60.33 ± 3.08** |
| Sperm viability (%) | 74.41 ± 5.69 | 37.40 ± 4.52† | 55.36 ± 5.15** | 62.36 ± 4.79** |
| Sperm motility (%) | 81.63 ± 4.80 | 40.11 ± 7.72† | 63.06 ± 5.46** | 66.80 ± 5.67** |
Notes: Values were indicated as mean ± SD of 6 rats. †p<0.001 versus NCG; **p<0.001 versus CPCG; ***p<0.01 versus CPCG.
Figure 2Effects of EMD on serum hormonal levels in CP treated rats. (A) testosterone (B) luteinizing hormone (LH)and (C) follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels. Values were indicated as mean ± SD of 6 rats. *p<0.001 versus NCG; **p<0.001 versus CPCG; ***p<0.01 versus CPCG.
Figure 3Effects of EMD on testicular oxidative stress levels in CP treated rats. (A) malonaldehyde (B) catalase (C) glutathione peroxidase (D) glutathione and (E)superoxide dismutase levels. Values were indicated as mean ± SD of 6 rats. *p<0.001 versus NCG; **p<0.001 versus CPCG; ***p<0.01 versus CPCG.
Figure 4Effects of EMD on testicular proinflammatory cytokine levels in CP treated rats. (A) tumor necrosis factor alpha and (B) interleukin 6. Values were indicated as mean ± SD of 6 rats. *p<0.001 versus NCG; **p<0.001 versus CPCG; ***p<0.01 versus CPCG.
Figure 5Representative histopathological sections of the testes showing the effect of EMD on CP induced histological alterations. H&E staining; 20× magnification; Scale bar = 50 µm. Black arrow: loss of connective tissues; Red arrow: loss of seminiferous tubule; Brown arrow: damages to the germinal epithelium and spermatocytes.