| Literature DB >> 34702930 |
Ghulam Mustafa1, Muhammad Arif Ali2, Donald L Smith3, Sajid Masood4, Muhammad Farooq Qayyum5, Niaz Ahmed6, Ateeq Ur Rehman7, Shakeel Ahmad8, Sajjad Hussain9, Muhammad Arshad10, Summia Muneer11, Aqib Hassan Ali Khan12, Shah Fahad13, Rahul Datta14, Mazhar Iqbal15, Timothy D Schwinghamer3.
Abstract
Nutrient disorder and presence of disease-causing agents in soilless media negatively influence the growth of muskmelon. To combat these issues, use of environmentally-friendly sanitation techniques is crucial for increased crop productivity. The study was conducted under greenhouse and field conditions to investigate the effect of two different sanitation techniques: steaming and formalin fumigation on various media's characteristics and their impact on muskmelon yield. Media: jantar, guar, wheat straw and rice hull and peat moss of 10% air-filled porosity and sanitized with formalin and steaming. Steaming of guar, jantar, and wheat straw increased the phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) concentrations by 13.80-14.86% and 6.22-8.45% over formalin fumigation. Likewise, P and K concentrations in muskmelon were higher under steaming. Steaming significantly inhibited the survival of Fusarium wilt sp. melonis, root knot nematode sp. meloidogyne and nitrifying bacteria in media than formalin fumigation. In conclusion, steaming decreased the prevalence of nitrifying bacteria and pathogens which thus improved the NO3--N:NH4+-N ratios, P and K nutritional balance both in the media and muskmelon transplants. Hence, steaming as an environment-friendly approach is recommended for soilless media. Further, optimization of steaming for various composts with different crops needs to be investigated with steaming teachnique.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34702930 PMCID: PMC8548321 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99692-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Estimates of least square means ± standard errors calculated on account of natural log (on the scale of inference) with their exponential means (on the scale of measurement) for the determination of experimental variables and their probabilities of germination.
| Compost | Sanitation | Germination (%) | Root length (cm) | Shoot height (cm) | TNL/seedling* | Leaf area (cm2) | Chlorophyll contents (SPAD value) | Fresh weight (g) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est. ± | Prob.* π × 100 ± | Est. ± | Exp.* (cm) | Est. ± | Exp. (cm) | Est. ± | Est. ± | Exp. (cm2) | Est ± | Exp. (g) | |||
| Peat moss | Control | 2.02 ± 0.05a | 88.33 ± 0.52 | 1.90 ± 0.01e | 6.67 | 1.89 ± 0.03d | 6.60 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.60 ± 0.03cd | 36.70 | 38.93 ± 0.83 f. | 1.43 ± 0.03 d | 4.17 |
| Formalin | 2.19 ± 0.05a | 89.97 ± 0.48 | 2.01 ± 0.02d | 7.47 | 1.95 ± 0.02bcd | 7.00 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.64 ± 0.03bc | 38.16 | 49.63 ± 1.36cde | 1.52 ± 0.02ab | 4.57 | |
| Steam | 2.19 ± 0.05a | 89.97 ± 0.48 | 2.02 ± 0.01d | 7.43 | 1.99 ± 0.02ab | 7.33 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.66 ± 0.04ab | 38.87 | 53.67 ± 0.88bc | 1.48 ± 0.02bc | 4.41 | |
| Guar | Control | 1.61 ± 0.04b | 83.33 ± 0.61 | 1.87 ± 0.02e | 6.47 | 1.90 ± 0.02d | 6.70 | 3.66 ± 0.01c | 3.58 ± 0.03d | 35.83 | 42.63 ± 0.97f | 1.44 ± 0.02cd | 4.21 |
| Formalin | 2.02 ± 0.05a | 88.33 ± 0.52 | 2.06 ± 0.03abc | 7.83 | 1.98 ± 0.01abc | 7.23 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.64 ± 0.02bc | 38.03 | 55.37 ± 1.03bc | 1.53 ± 0.03ab | 4.59 | |
| Steam | 2.02 ± 0.05a | 88.33 ± 0.52 | 2.06 ± 0.01abc | 7.83 | 1.95 ± 0.01bcd | 7.00 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.66 ± 0.04ab | 38.90 | 57.13 ± 4.27b | 1.53 ± 0.02ab | 4.61 | |
| Jantar | Control | 1.61 ± 0.04b | 83.33 ± 0.61 | 1.90 ± 0.01e | 6.70 | 1.88 ± 0.01d | 6.53 | 3.69 ± 0.01c | 3.59 ± 0.03d | 36.17 | 40.27 ± 1.51f | 1.43 ± 0.03d | 4.17 |
| Formalin | 2.19 ± 0.05a | 89.97 ± 0.48 | 2.03 ± 0.01bcd | 7.63 | 1.94 ± 0.02bcd | 6.97 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.68 ± 0.04ab | 39.47 | 50.89 ± 1.57bcd | 1.55 ± 0.02a | 4.71 | |
| Steam | 2.19 ± 0.05a | 89.97 ± 0.48 | 1.99 ± 0.02d | 7.33 | 1.93 ± 0.01bcd | 6.90 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.66 ± 0.02ab | 38.77 | 55.72 ± 9.57bc | 1.52 ± 0.03ab | 4.59 | |
| Wheat straw | Control | 1.61 ± 0.04b | 83.34 ± 0.61 | 1.91 ± 0.02e | 6.73 | 1.92 ± 0.01cd | 6.83 | 3.69 ± 0.01c | 3.58 ± 0.01d | 35.80 | 44.03 ± 1.39ef | 1.43 ± 0.02d | 4.18 |
| Formalin | 2.03 ± 0.05a | 88.36 ± 0.52 | 2.01 ± 0.01d | 7.47 | 2.02 ± 0.02a | 7.57 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.64 ± 0.02bc | 38.10 | 51.93 ± 0.97bcd | 1.52 ± 0.01ab | 4.59 | |
| Steam | 2.03 ± 0.05a | 88.4 ± 0.52 | 2.02 ± 0.03cd | 7.53 | 2.00 ± 0.03ab | 7.40 | 4.00 ± 0.00b | 3.66 ± 0.03ab | 38.87 | 52.93 ± 7.28bc | 1.53 ± 0.03ab | 4.64 | |
| Rice hull | Control | 2.02 ± 0.05a | 88.31 ± 0.52 | 2.01 ± 0.03d | 7.47 | 1.99 ± 0.02ab | 7.33 | 4.33 ± 0.01a | 3.58 ± 0.02d | 35.93 | 45.37 ± 1.08def | 1.43 ± 0.02d | 4.17 |
| Formalin | 2.40 ± 0.06a | 91.71 ± 0.44 | 2.06 ± 0.01ab | 7.87 | 1.99 ± 0.03ab | 7.33 | 4.31 ± 0.01a | 3.65 ± 0.02bc | 38.33 | 64.97 ± 1.30a | 1.53 ± 0.03ab | 4.60 | |
| Steam | 2.40 ± 0.06a | 91.68 ± 0.44 | 2.09 ± 0.02a | 8.07 | 1.97 ± 0.01abc | 7.19 | 4.33 ± 0.01a | 3.70 ± 0.03a | 40.43 | 70.43 ± 10.31a | 1.53 ± 0.03ab | 4.59 | |
Prob. probabilities, π probabilities of germination, SE standard error, Est. estimates, Exp. exponential, TNL total number of true leaves.
Means sharing similar letter in a row or in a column are statistically non-significant (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1Effect of composts and sanitation techniques on: (a) growth rate (cm week−1) for site 1; (b) growth rate (cm week−1) for site 2; (c) Growth rate (cm week−1) for site 3; (d) yield (kg plant−1) for site 1; (e) yield (kg plant−1) for site 2, (f) yield (kg plant−1) for site 3 of muskmelon. All the values are means ± S.E of three replicates, whereas case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 2Effect of sanitized media on: (a) relative abundance of nitrifying bacteria over the time, (b) NO3−–N mg kg−1 media, (c) NH4+–N mg kg−1 media and (d) NO3−–N + NH4+–N mg kg−1 media over the time. All the values are means ± S.E of three replicates, whereas case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at p ≤ 0.05 level. All the composts used in greenhouse experiment were established at 10% AFP. DAS = Days were after sanitation.
Figure 3Inorganic-N concentrations: NO3−–N and NH4+–N concentrations in muskmelon transplants as influenced by sanitation techniques. All the values are means ± S.E of three replicates, whereas case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 4Relative concentrations of nutrients in the media and muskmelon seedlings under different sanitation techniques. Concentrations of various nutrients: (a) total N; (b) P; (c) K in the media; (d) N; (e) P and (f) K in muskmelons transplants have been represented. All the values are means ± S.E of three replicates, whereas case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Figure 5Comparative effect of the composts and sanitation techniques on root knot nematode disease severity (a) site 1; (b) site 2; (c) site 3 and Fusarium wilt disease (%), (d) site 1; (e) site 2; (f) site 3. All the values are means ± S.E of three replicates, whereas case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Effect of composts and sanitation techniques on relative abundance of juveniles of root knot nematode and Fusarium oxysporium sp. melonis in the media.
| Composts | Sanitation techniques | Nematode J2S stage (103 × kg−1 of media) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peat moss | Control | 3.33 ± 0.67ab | 96.67 ± 3.33c |
| Formalin | 1.67 ± 0.33b–e | 43.33 ± 8.82de | |
| Streaming | 1.33 ± 0.33a–d | 33.33 ± 3.33de | |
| Guar | Control | 3.00 ± 0.58abc | 170.00 ± 5.77ab |
| Formalin | 2.00 ± 0.00a–d | 53.33 ± 14.53d | |
| Streaming | 1.00 ± 0.58a–d | 41.67 ± 4.41de | |
| Janter | Control | 3.67 ± 0.33a | 147.00 ± 3.33b |
| Formalin | 1.33 ± 0.33cde | 40.00 ± 5.77de | |
| Streaming | 0.67 ± 0.33e | 36.67 ± 8.82de | |
| Wheat straw | Control | 3.00 ± 0.58abc | 183.33 ± 8.82a |
| Formalin | 1.67 ± 0.33b–e | 60.00 ± 5.77d | |
| Streaming | 0.67 ± 0.33e | 53.33 ± 3.33d | |
| Rice hull | Control | 1.33 ± 0.33cde | 40.00 ± 5.77de |
| Formalin | 0.67 ± 0.33de | 16.67 ± 3.33e | |
| Streaming | 0.67 ± 0.33e | 11.67 ± 1.67e |
All the values are means of three replicates, whereas letters exhibit significant differences among the treatments at p ≤ 0.05 level.
Soil physico-chemical properties of the experimental sites.
| Site | Address | Latitudes longitudes | Depth (cm) | Texture | pH | EC (dS m−1) | SAR | SOM (%) | N (%) | P (mg kg−1 soil) | K (mg kg−1 soil) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site 1 | Ghallu, Mailsi | 29.89° N 72.08° E | 15 | Sandy loam | 8.07 ± 0.32 | 0.86 ± 0.02 | 3.56 ± 0.12 | 0.76 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.002 | 6.41 ± 0.23 | 83 ± 3.92 |
| Site 2 | Lakhokha, Mailsi | 29.88° N 72.06° E | 15 | Loam | 8.23 ± 0.29 | 1.03 ± 0.03 | 2.84 ± 0.11 | 0.91 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.002 | 7.93 ± 0.33 | 167 ± 7.42 |
| Site 3 | Marri Mitru, Mailsi | 29.80° N 72.17° E | 15 | Clay loam | 8.34 ± 0.18 | 0.97 ± 0.04 | 3.11 ± 0.13 | 0.87 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.002 | 7.17 ± 0.27 | 173 ± 8.01 |
All the values means ± S.E of three replicates.