Antistio Aviz-Amador1, Neyder Contreras-Puentes2, Jairo Mercado-Camargo3. 1. Pharmacology and Therapeutic Group, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia. 2. Pharmacology and Therapeutic Group, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia; GINUMED, Faculty of Medicine, Rafael Nuñez University Corporation, Cartagena, Colombia. Electronic address: neyder.contreras@curnvirtual.edu.co. 3. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cannabis sativa has been attributed to different pharmacological properties. A number of secondary metabolites such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBD), and different analogs, with highly promising biological activity on CB1 and CB2 receptors, have been identified. METHODS: Thus, this study aimed was to evaluate the activity of THC, CBD, and their analogs using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations (MD) methods. Initially, the molecules (ligands) were selected by bioinformatics searches in databases. Subsequently, CB1 and CB2 receptors were retrieved from the protein data bank database. Afterward, each receptor and its ligands were optimized to perform molecular docking. Then, MD Simulation was performed with the most stable ligand-receptor complexes. Finally, the Molecular Mechanics-Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-PBSA) method was applied to analyze the binding free energy between ligands and cannabinoid receptors. RESULTS: The results obtained showed that ligand LS-61176 presented the best affinity in the molecular docking analysis. Also, this analog could be a CB1 negative allosteric modulator like CBD and probably an agonist in CB2 like THC and CBD according to their dynamic behavior in silico. The possibility of having a THC and a CBD analog (LS-61176) as a promising molecule for experimental evaluation since it could have no central side-effects on CB1 and have effects of CB2 useful in pain, inflammation, and some immunological disorders. Docking results were validate using ROC curve for both cannabinoids receptor where AUC for CB1 receptor was 0.894±0.024, and for CB2 receptor AUC was 0.832±0032, indicating good affinity prediction.
BACKGROUND: Cannabis sativa has been attributed to different pharmacological properties. A number of secondary metabolites such as tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabinol (CBD), and different analogs, with highly promising biological activity on CB1 and CB2 receptors, have been identified. METHODS: Thus, this study aimed was to evaluate the activity of THC, CBD, and their analogs using molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations (MD) methods. Initially, the molecules (ligands) were selected by bioinformatics searches in databases. Subsequently, CB1 and CB2 receptors were retrieved from the protein data bank database. Afterward, each receptor and its ligands were optimized to perform molecular docking. Then, MD Simulation was performed with the most stable ligand-receptor complexes. Finally, the Molecular Mechanics-Generalized Born Surface Area (MM-PBSA) method was applied to analyze the binding free energy between ligands and cannabinoid receptors. RESULTS: The results obtained showed that ligand LS-61176 presented the best affinity in the molecular docking analysis. Also, this analog could be a CB1 negative allosteric modulator like CBD and probably an agonist in CB2 like THC and CBD according to their dynamic behavior in silico. The possibility of having a THC and a CBD analog (LS-61176) as a promising molecule for experimental evaluation since it could have no central side-effects on CB1 and have effects of CB2 useful in pain, inflammation, and some immunological disorders. Docking results were validate using ROC curve for both cannabinoids receptor where AUC for CB1 receptor was 0.894±0.024, and for CB2 receptor AUC was 0.832±0032, indicating good affinity prediction.
Authors: Monique van Es-Remers; Jesus Arellano Spadaro; Eefje Poppelaars; Hye Kyong Kim; Marieke van Haaster; Marcel de Wit; Eva ILiopoulou; Marjolein Wildwater; Henrie Korthout Journal: J Cannabis Res Date: 2022-10-03