Literature DB >> 34700089

Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau.

Lingbo Dong1, Jiwei Li2, Yu Zhang2, Mengyao Bing1, Yulin Liu2, Jianzhao Wu1, Xuying Hai1, Ao Li1, Kaibo Wang3, Puxia Wu4, Zhouping Shangguan5, Lei Deng6.   

Abstract

Soil degradation is significantly increased driven by soil nutrient loss and soil erodibility, thus, hampering the sustainable development of the ecological environment and agricultural production. Vegetation restoration has been widely adopted to prevent soil degradation given its role in improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility. However, it is unclear which vegetation type has the best improving capacity from soil nutrient and soil erodibility perspectives. This study selected three vegetation restoration types of grasslands (GL), shrublands (SL), and forestlands (FL) along the five slope positions (i.e., top, upper, middle, lower, and foot slope), to investigate the effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility. All vegetation restoration types were restored for 20 years from croplands (CL). We used comprehensive soil nutrient index (CSNI) and comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) formed by a weighted summation method to reflect the effect of vegetation restoration on the improving capacity of soil nutrient and erodibility. The results showed the vegetation types with the highest comprehensive soil quality index (CSQI) at the top, upper, middle, lower and foot slope were FL (1.92), FL (1.98), SL (2.15), FL (2.37) and GL (3.93), respectively. When only one vegetation type was considered on the entire slope, SL (0.59) and FL (0.59) had the highest CSNI, the SL had the lowest CSEI (0.34) and the highest CSQI (1.89). The CSNI was mainly influenced by soil structure stability index (SSSI), sand content, silt + clay particles, and CSEI was controlled by soil organic matter (SOM), macroaggregates and microaggregates. Moreover, the CSQI was influenced by pH, silt and clay content, and biome coverage (BC). The study suggested the SL were advised as the best vegetation restoration type on the whole slope from improving soil nutrients and soil erodibility.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Slope position; Soil erodibility; Soil nutrients; Soil quality; Vegetation restoration; oil degradation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34700089     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  2 in total

1.  Effects of vegetation spatial pattern on erosion and sediment particle sorting in the loess convex hillslope.

Authors:  Yuanyi Su; Yang Zhang; Huanyuan Wang; Tingyu Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Effect of Cultivated Pastures on Soil Bacterial Communities in the Karst Rocky Desertification Area.

Authors:  Shuzhen Song; Kangning Xiong; Yongkuan Chi; Cheng He; Jinzhong Fang; Shuyu He
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.064

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.